Soil Arthropod Responses in Agroecosystem: Implications of Different Management and Cropping Systems

Publication Type:Journal Article
Year of Publication:2020
Autoren:C. Menta, Conti, F. D., Fondón, C. L., Staffilani, F., Remelli, S.
Journal:Agronomy
Volume:10
Problem:7
Pagination:1-19
Date Published:09/07/2020
ISSN:2073-4395
Schlüsselwörter:bioindicators, land management, mesofauna, soil biodiversity, soil degradation, soil quality
Zusammenfassung:

The EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP 2014–2020) on soil management points to the combination of sustainable food production with environmental protection, reduction of CO2 emissions, and safeguarding of soil biodiversity. In this study, three farms (in the Emilia-Romagna region), managed with both conventional and conservation practices (the last ones with and without sub-irrigation systems), were monitored from 2014 to 2017 to highlight the impact of different crops and soil managements on soil arthropods, in terms of abundance, composition, and soil biological quality (applying QBS-ar index). To do this, linear mixed models were performed, whereas arthropods assemblages were studied through PERMANOVA and SIMPER analysis. Soil communities varied among farms, although most differences were found among crops depending on management practices. Nonetheless, conservation systems and a wider reduction in anthropogenic practices provided better conditions for soil fauna, enhancing QBS-ar. Moreover, arthropod groups responded to soil practices differently, highlighting their sensitivity to agricultural management. Community assemblages in corn and wheat differed between managements, mainly due to Acari and Collembola, respectively. In conservation management, wheat showed the overall greatest abundance of arthropods, owing to the great number of Acari, Collembola, and Hymenoptera, while the number of arthropod groups were generally higher in crop residues of forage.

Recommended citation: Menta C, Conti FD, Lozano Fondón C, Staffilani F, Remelli S (2020): Soil Arthropod Responses in Agroecosystem: Implications of Different Management and Cropping Systems. Agronomy, 10 (7), Art. 982: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10070982

URL:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/7/982
DOI:10.3390/agronomy10070982
Citation Key:1159
Refereed Designation:Refereed
Scratchpads developed and conceived by (alphabetical): Ed Baker, Katherine Bouton Alice Heaton Dimitris Koureas, Laurence Livermore, Dave Roberts, Simon Rycroft, Ben Scott, Vince Smith