02439nas a2200133 4500008004100000022004600041245004300087210003900130260006400169300001200233520200200245100001902247856003902266 2019 eng d a978-952-11-4973-3, ISBN 978-952-11-4974-000aTuhatjalkaiset - Myriapods - Myriapoda0 aTuhatjalkaiset Myriapods Myriapoda aHelsinkibYmpäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus a340-3433 a

Viittausohje, kun viitataan yksittäiseen Punaisen listan lukuun: Vahtera, V. 2019. Tuhatjalkaiset. Julk.: Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. (toim.) 2019. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus – Punainen kirja 2019. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus. Helsinki. S. 340-343. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Reference of a separate chapter of the Red List: Vahtera, V. 2019. Myriapods. In: Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. (eds.) 2019. The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species. Ministry of the Environment & Finnish Environment Institute. Helsinki. P. 340-343. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Summary: Myriapoda are a diverse group of terrestrial arthropods, some of which are herbivores, some predators and some decomposers. There are four classes of Myriapoda: centipedes (Chilopoda), millipedes (Diplopoda), pauropods (Pauropoda), and symphylans (Symphyla). In Finland, a total of 63 species have been found: 21 centipede, 28 millipede, eight pauropod, and six symphylan species. In total, there are ten red-listed species: the critically endangered (CR) Geophilus carpophagus, which was classified as Regionally Extinct (RE) in the two previous assessments, and the Near Threatened (NT) species G. electricus, G. truncorum and Julus scanicus. These species only have one known locality each, and no new observations have been made of the three Near Threatened (NT) species for a long time. Six species have been categorised as Data Deficient (DD). Many species were classified as Not Evaluated (NE) due to insufficient information on their occurrence. While no monitoring of Myriapoda has been organised in Finland, the information on the spread of the species in this country could be updated by organising a monitoring study of a few years in duration.

1 aVahtera, Varpu uhttp://hdl.handle.net/10138/29950108893nam a2200337 4500008004100000022004600041245005500087210005100142260006400193300000800257520789800265653001508163653002808178653001708206653000908223653002108232653001908253653001308272653001408285653001908299653002208318653002308340653002208363653002608385100002108411700001808432700002108450700002208471700002308493856003908516 2019 eng d a978-952-11-4973-3, ISBN 978-952-11-4974-000aSuomen lajien uhanalaisuus – Punainen kirja 20190 aSuomen lajien uhanalaisuus Punainen kirja 2019 aHelsinkibYmpäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus a7043 a

Tiivistelmä: Julkaisussa esitellään Suomen lajien viides uhanalaisuusarviointi. Suomen lajimäärän arvioidaan nykyään olevan vähintään 48 000. Riittävät tiedot uhanalaisuusarviointiin oli 22 418 lajista tai alemmasta taksonista, mikä on noin 47 % lajistosta. Uhanalaisiksi arvioitiin 2 668 lajia tai alempaa taksonia eli noin 11,9 % arvioiduista lajeista. Punaisen listan lajeja, joihin kuuluvat uhanalaisten lisäksi hävinneet, silmälläpidettävät ja puutteellisesti tunnetut on yhteensä 6 683 (29,8 %). Arvioiduista lajeista äärimmäisen uhanalaisia (CR) on 489, erittäin uhanalaisia (EN) 918, vaarantuneita (VU) 1 260, silmälläpidettäviä (NT) 1 912, puutteellisesti tunnettuja (DD) 1 792, hävinneitä (RE) 312 ja elinvoimaisia (LC) 15 735. Arviointi tehtiin Kansainvälisen luonnonsuojeluliiton (IUCN) ohjeiden ja kriteerien mukaan. IUCN:n alueellisen uhanalaisuusarvioinnin kriteerit perustuvat lajien havaittuun, arvioituun, pääteltyyn tai ennustettuun populaatioiden pienenemiseen, levinneisyys- tai esiintymisalueen kokoon, pieneen ja jatkuvasti taantuvaan tai hyvin pieneen populaatioon tai kvantitatiiviseen analyysiin. Lisäksi Suomessa on dokumentoitu lajien elinympäristöt sekä uhanalaisuuden syyt ja uhkatekijät. Enemmistö uhanalaisista lajeista elää metsissä (31 %) sekä perinneympäristöissä ja muissa ihmisen muuttamissa ympäristöissä (24 %). Uhanalaisten osuus kunkin elinympäristön arvioiduista lajeista on korkein tunturipaljakalla (37,9 %). Uhanalaisten lajien määrä on suurin hemiboreaalisella ja eteläboreaalisella vyöhykkeellä Etelä-Suomessa. Julkaisussa vertaillaan arvioinnin tuloksia vuoden 2010 tuloksiin esimerkiksi uhanalaisuusindeksin avulla. Lisäksi julkaisussa tarkastellaan vuoden 2010 uhanalaisuusarvioinnin ohjausryhmän ehdotusten toteutumista. Arvioinnin tulosten pohjalta Eliölajien uhanalaisuuden arvioinnin ohjausryhmä (LAUHA) esittää 13 toimenpide-ehdotusta uhanalaisten lajien suojelun, hoidon, tutkimuksen ja seurannan järjestämiseksi ja rahoittamiseksi. Arvioinnit on tehty eliöryhmäkohtaisissa työryhmissä ja työn tulokset esitellään eliöryhmittäin 39 luvussa.

Viittausohje, kun viitataan koko julkaisuun: Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. (toim.) 2019. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus – Punainen kirja 2019. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus. Helsinki. 704 s. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Sammandrag: I denna bok presenteras resultat av Finlands femte hotbedömning. Finlands artantal uppskattas för tillfället till minst 48 000. Tillräckliga uppgifter för hotbedömning fanns om 22 418 arter eller lägre taxa, vilket utgör 47 % av alla arter. Av dessa bedömdes 2 667 arter eller lägre taxa vara hotade, d.v.s. 11,9 %. Rödlistade arter, som förutom hotade arter även innefattar försvunna arter, nära hotade arter och arter som det råder kunskapsbrist om, uppgår till 6 683 (29,8 %). Av de bedömda arterna är 498 akut hotade (CR), 918 starkt hotade (EN), 1 260 sårbara (VU), 1 912 nära hotade (NT), 1 792 med kunskapsbrist (DD), 312 försvunna (RE) och 15 735 livskraftiga. Hoten har bedömts på basis av Internationella Naturvårdsunionens (IUCN) regionala hotbedömningskriterier. Kriterierna grundar sig på observerad, deduktiv eller estimerad minskning av populationer eller utbrednings- och förekomstområden, en liten och kontinuerligt minskande eller en mycket liten population eller på kvantitativ analys. Därutöver har arternas livsmiljö, hotorsak och hotfaktorer i Finland dokumenterats. Majoriteten av de hotade arterna lever i skogar (31 %), vårdbiotoper och andra kulturmiljöer (24 %). Antalet hotade arter är högst inom den hemiboreala och sydboreala zonen i södra Finland. Andelen hotade arter i en specifik habitattyp är högst i kalfjället(37,9 %). I publikationen jämförs resultaten av hotbedömningen med resultaten från år 2010 t.ex. med hjälp av rödlisteindexet. Vid sidan av bedömningsresultaten beskrivs de mest påtagliga administrativa och juridiska åtgärder som vidtagits för artskydd samt forskning och övervakning sedan den föregående bedömningen. Hotbedömningens styrgrupp (LAUHA ) föreslår 13 åtgärder för organisering och finansiering av skydd, vård, forskning och övervakning av hotade arter. Resultaten av bedömningen som är genomförd av expertgrupper presenteras i 39 kapitel som omfattar olika organismgrupper.

The Red List of Finnish Species 2019

Abstract: This publication describes the fifth assessment of Finnish threatened species. The current estimated number of species in Finland is at least 48,000. Sufficient information was available for the evaluation of 22,418 species or lower taxa, which is approximately 47% of all species. In total, 2,667 species or lower taxa (11.9%) were assessed as threatened. The red-listed species, which, in addition to threatened species, include the species classified as Regionally Extinct, Near Threatened, and Data Deficient, total 6,683 (29.8%). Of the species evaluated, 489 were classified as Critically Endangered (CR), 918 as Endangered (EN), 1,260 as Vulnerable (VU), 1,912 as Near Threatened (NT), 1,792 as Data Deficient (DD), 312 as Regionally Extinct (RE), and 15,735 as of Least Concern (LC). The assessment was carried out in accordance with guidelines and criteria issued by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and applied in assessments at the regional level. These criteria are based on observed, estimated, inferred, or projected population size reduction; the extent of occurrence or area of occupancy; continuing decline in a small population or a very small size of population; or a quantitative analysis. In addition, species’ habitats, as well as causes of threat and threat factors, were documented in the Finnish evaluation. The majority of threatened species live in forests (31%) and in rural biotopes and other cultural habitats (24%). Of the species assessed the proportion of threatened species is highest in Alpine habitats (37.9%). The number of threatened species is highest in the hemiboreal and southern boreal zones in southern Finland. The results of the assessment are compared to the previous assessment 2010 for example with the Red List Index. In addition, proceedings of the proposals given by the steering group of the previous assessment are evaluated. The steering group of this assessment made 13 proposals for measures for the arrangement and financing of the conservation, management, research, and monitoring of threatened species. The results of the work of the expert groups responsible for the evaluation are presented in 39 organism group -specific sections.

Reference of the publication: Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. (eds.) 2019. The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus. Helsinki. 704 p. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Publication date: 26/02/2019

10abedömning10aconservation of species10ahotade arter10aIUCN10alajiston suojelu10apunainen lista10aRed list10arödlista10askydd av arter10athreat assessment10athreatened species10auhanalaiset lajit10auhanalaisuusarviointi1 aHyvärinen, Esko1 aJuslén, Aino1 aKemppainen, Eija1 aUddström, Annika1 aLiukko, Ulla-Maija uhttp://hdl.handle.net/10138/29950101827nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245008600055210006900141260001500210300000900225490000600234520115100240653001501391653001801406653001201424653001301436653001501449653001101464100001801475700001901493700002401512856004901536 2014 eng d a1314-282800aMillipedes and centipedes in German greenhouses (Myriapoda: Diplopoda, Chilopoda)0 aMillipedes and centipedes in German greenhouses Myriapoda Diplop c11/04/2014 a1-430 v23 a

A review is given of all the literature records of millipedes and centipedes that have been found in German greenhouses together with additional records for 29 such sites. Species lists are given for 46 greenhouses investigated throughout Germany. Thirty-five diplopod and 18 chilopod species were found to occur in greenhouses, of which 15 (3 Chilopoda, 12 Diplopoda) are restricted to this type of habitat. First records for Germany include Anadenobolus monilicornis (Porat, 1876), Epinannolene cf. trinidadensis Chamberlin, 1918, Epinannolene sp., Mesoiulus gridellii Strasser, 1934, Leptogoniulus sorornus (Butler, 1876), Rhinotus purpureus (Pocock, 1894), Cryptops doriae Pocock, 1891, Lamyctes coeculus (Brölemann, 1889) and Tygarrup javanicus (Attems, 1907). The millipedes Oxidus gracilis (C. L. Koch, 1847) and Amphitomeus attemsi (Schubart, 1934) and the centipedes Lithobius forficatus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Cryptops hortensis (Donovan, 1810) are the species most frequently found in greenhouses.

10acentipedes10afirst records10aGermany10ahothouse10amillipedes10areview1 aDecker, Peter1 aReip, Hans, S.1 aVoigtländer, Karin uhttps://bdj.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=106602124nas a2200301 4500008004100000022002500041245007900066210006900145260001500214300001100229490000800240520123300248653001301481653001401494653001701508653001601525653001901541653002501560100001501585700002301600700002001623700002001643700002501663700002601688700002101714700001801735856006901753 2019 eng d a0012-9658, 1939-917000aA meta food web for invertebrate species collected in a European grassland0 ameta food web for invertebrate species collected in a European g c05/03/2019 ae026790 v1003 a

Patterns of feeding interactions between species are thought to influence the stability of communities and the flux of nutrients and energy through ecosystems. However, surprisingly few well-resolved food webs allow us to evaluate factors that influence the architecture of species interactions. We constructed a meta food web consisting of 714 invertebrate species collected over 9 years of suction and pitfall sampling campaigns in the Jena Experiment, a long-term grassland biodiversity experiment located in Jena, Germany. We summarize information on the 51,496 potential trophic links, which were established using information on diet specificity and species traits that typically constrain feeding interactions (trophic group, body size, and vertical stratification). The list of species identities, traits, and link-derivation rules will be useful not only for tests of plant diversity effects on food web structure within the Jena Experiment, but also for considering consistent construction of food webs from empirical data, and for comparisons of network structure across ecosystems. No copyright or proprietary restrictions are associated with the use of this data set other than citation of this Data Paper.

10afood web10agrassland10ainvertebrate10ameta-matrix10aspecies traits10atrophic interactions1 aHines, Jes1 aGiling, Darren, P.1 aRzanny, Michael1 aVoigt, Winfried1 aMeyer, Sebastian, T.1 aWeisser, Wolfgang, W.1 aEisenhauer, Nico1 aEbeling, Anne uhttps://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.267901601nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001500214300001200229490000700241520090700248653001501155653001201170653001501182653001701197653001501214100002701229700002101256700002401277856007001301 2020 eng d a0022-432400aA taxonomic key for nine first record species of Chilopoda-Arthropoda in Central Iraq0 ataxonomic key for nine first record species of ChilopodaArthropo c15/05/2020 a608-6140 v513 a

This study aimed to classified some species of Chilopoda which is the first record in Iraq. The samples collected from April 2018 to March 2019, in some areas of central of Iraq, which are: Baghdad, Anbar, Babylon, Diyala and Qadisiyah. We found nine species from 183 numbers of samples. The species we recorded for a first time in Iraq are: Scolopendra amazonica, S. afer, Cormocephalus nigrificatus, Cryptops anomalans, Geophilus flavus, Haplophilus souletinus, Lithobius microps, Lamyctes emarginatus and Scutigera coleoptrata. The species were supported by photos, then the samples where stored in Iraq Natural History Research center and Museum.

Remark: Keywords are wrong and were not added. The printed keywords belong to the subsequent article (by the same authors) in the issue.

10aChoneiulus10aJulidae10amillipedes10aPolydesmidae10aPolydesmus1 aAl-Doori, Maysaloon, L1 aAzooz, Hayder, W1 aAl-Door, Nibrass, L uhttps://www.lepidopteraresearchfoundation.org/abstract.php?id=21001282nas a2200145 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214300001000226520079400236100002701030700002001057856005901077 2020 eng d a0242-177100aMyriapodes chilopodes et diplopodes des souterrains de Paris et de sa proche banlieue0 aMyriapodes chilopodes et diplopodes des souterrains de Paris et  c03/2020 a39-473 a

Une campagne d’échantillonnage des invertébrés a été menée dans les réseaux souterrains de la ville de Paris et de la banlieue proche. Le présent travail présente les résultats obtenus concernant les myriapodes (chilopodes et diplopodes) issus de ces récoltes. Six espèces de chilopodes (Classe Chilopoda) et neuf espèces de diplopodes (Classe Diplopoda) ont pu être identifiées. Parmi ces dernières, certaines espèces sont nouvelles pour les départements des Yvelines, des Hauts-de-Seine et de la Seine-Saint-Denis. Ces résultats contribuent à l'enrichissement des inventaires et atlas des myriapodes de France (project INAMYFRA).

1 aGeoffroy, Jean-Jacques1 aFerrand, Marina uhttps://publications.ffspeleo.fr/bulletin.php?id=2599903012nas a2200265 4500008004100000022001400041245021600055210007000271260001500341300001000356490000700366520192200373653002002295653001402315653001502329653001702344653002302361653001602384653001502400653001702415100002002432700002702452700002502479856024202504 2020 eng d a0750-684800aDécouverte du lithobiomorphe Lithobius lemairei Iorio, Zapparoli, Ponel & Geoffroy, 2015 (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha) et de plusieurs coléoptères endogés (Insecta, Coleoptera) à Nice (Alpes-Maritimes)0 aDécouverte du lithobiomorphe iLithobius lemaireii Iorio Zapparol c26/03/2020 a57-620 v483 a

Résumé: Le chilopode endogé Lithobius lemairei a été observé dans le parc de la Villa Paradiso, à Nice (Alpes-Maritimes). Certains caractères des nouveaux individus sont brièvement retranscrits et l’espèce est transférée dans le sous-genre Sigibius Chamberlin, 1913. Plusieurs espèces déterminantes de coléoptères endogés ont aussi été observées à cet endroit: Bathysciola guillaumensis Avon & Courtial, 2006, Paramaurops varensis Binaghi, 1945 et Rhopaletes solifugus Ganglbauer, 1895. Malgré son contexte urbain, le parc concerné revêt un fort intérêt écologique car le secteur de l’affleurement calcaire où vivent ces espèces est préservé depuis longtemps.

Discovery of the lithobiomorph centipede Lithobius lemairei Iorio, Zapparoli, Ponel & Geoffroy, 2015 (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha) and of several soil-dwelling beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera) in Nice (Maritime Alps)

The soil-dwelling (endogeic) centipede Lithobius lemairei has been observed in the gardens of the Villa Paradiso in Nice (Alpes-Maritimes, France). Some criteria are briefly described and the species is transferred to the subgenus Sigibius Chamberlin, 1913. Several determinant species of soil-dwelling beetles have also been found in the same station: Bathysciola guillaumensis Avon & Courtial, 2006, Paramaurops varensis Binaghi, 1945 and Rhopaletes solifugus Ganglbauer, 1895. Despite its urban localization, this garden has a strong ecological interest, because the calcareous sector where these species live has been preserved for a long time.

10aAlpes-Maritimes10aChilopoda10aColeoptera10adistribution10aLithobius lemairei10amorphologie10amorphology10arépartition1 aIorio, Étienne1 aGeoffroy, Jean-Jacques1 aLemaire, Jean-Michel uhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/340203889_Decouverte_du_lithobiomorphe_Lithobius_lemairei_Iorio_Zapparoli_Ponel_Geoffroy_2015_Chilopoda_Lithobiomorpha_et_de_plusieurs_coleopteres_endoges_Insecta_Coleoptera_a_Nice_Alpes-Maritimes02589nas a2200181 4500008004100000022001400041245013500055210006900190260001500259300000900274520195400283100002502237700001902262700002102281700002702302700002002329856005802349 2020 eng d a0748-300700aPhylogeny of Lithobiidae Newport, 1844, with emphasis on the megadiverse genus Lithobius Leach, 1814 (Myriapoda, Chilopoda)0 aPhylogeny of Lithobiidae Newport 1844 with emphasis on the megad c04/11/2020 a1-233 a

Phylogenetic analyses based on molecular and morphological data were conducted to shed light on relationships within the mostly Palaearctic/Oriental centipede family Lithobiidae, with a particular focus on the Palaearctic genus Lithobius Leach, 1814 (Lithobiidae, Lithobiomorpha), which contains >500 species and subspecies. Previous studies based on morphological data resolved Lithobius as nonmonophyletic, but molecular‐based phylogenetic analyses have until now sampled few species. To elucidate species inter‐relationships of the genus, test the validity of its classification into subgenera, and infer its relationships with other Lithobiidae, we obtained molecular data (nuclear markers: 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA; mitochondrial markers: 16S rRNA, COI) and 61 morphological characters for 44 species of Lithobius representing four of its eight subgenera and nine other representatives of Lithobiidae. The data were analyzed phylogenetically using maximum‐likelihood, parsimony and Bayesian inference. This study suggests that (i) a close relationship between L. giganteus and the pterygotergine Disphaerobius loricatus highlighted in recent morphological analyses is also strongly supported by molecular data, and Pterygoterginae is formally synonymized with Lithobiinae; (ii) the Oriental/Australian genus Australobius is consistently resolved as sister group to all other sampled Lithobiidae by the molecular and combined data; (iii) the subfamily Ethopolyinae may be paraphyletic; (iv) the genus Lithobius is nonmonophyletic; (v) the subgenera Lithobius, Sigibius and Monotarsobius are nonmonophyletic and should not be used in future taxonomic studies; and (vi) there are instances of cryptic species and cases in which subspecies should be elevated to full species status, as identified for some European taxa within Lithobius.

1 aGanske, Anne‐Sarah1 aVahtera, Varpu1 aDányi, László1 aEdgecombe, Gregory, D.1 aAkkari, Nesrine uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cla.1243104196nas a2200253 4500008004100000245011700041210007300158260007100231300000700302490001300309520340800322653001403730653001603744653001803760653001003778653000903788653001103797653001003808653001403818653001403832653001403846100002203860856006003882 2020 eng d00aKterý způsob managementu polomu vyhovuje stonožkám? - Which windthrow management is suitable for centipedes?0 aKterý způsob managementu polomu vyhovuje stonožkám Which windthr aOlomoucbUP v Olomouci - Palacky University of Olomoucc28/01/2020 a350 vbachelor3 a

Větrné disturbance hrají významnou roli ve vývojovém cyklu horského smrkového lesa. Plošné odstranění zapojeného korunového patra otevírá prostor pro nová společenstva a společně s lýkožroutem smrkovým je podle posledních studií klíčovým prvkem obnovy horské smrčiny. Větrné disturbance však ovlivňují i hospodářské smrkové lesy, kde je většinou tendence padlé dřevo zpracovat pro ekonomický zisk a jako prevenci vůči požárům a kůrovcové kalamitě. Takový zásah vichřice má přirozený dopad i na půdní faunu. Tato práce se zabývá dopadem vichřice na společenstva stonožek ve Vysokých a Západních Tatrách a snaží se zodpovědět otázku, jaký následný management polomu ve smrkovém lese stonožkám více vyhovuje. Pro odběry byly stanoveny referenční plochy a plochy s odlišným managementem polomu, které byli primárně sledovány mezi roky 2007 až 2009. Pro odběr materiálu byly použity půdní vzorky, pro sledování epigeické aktivity stonožek byly na lokalitách umístěny padací zemní pasti. Celkově bylo determinováno 2535 jedinců, zaznamenáno bylo 14 druhů. Ze získaných dat lze usoudit, že bezzásahový management měl 5 let po vichřici pozitivnější vliv na abundance stonožek oproti asanačnímu managementu na sledovaných plochách.

Vaverka M. (2020): Which windthrow management is suitable for centipedes? [bachelor’s thesis]. Olomouc: Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Palacky University of Olomouc. 35 pp. 2 Appendices. In Czech.

English Abstract:
Wind disturbances play an important role in the development cycle of mountain spruce forest.
Complete removal of the tree canopy open space for new communities and together with spruce bark beetle, according to the current studies, are a key element in development cycle of mountain spruce forest. However, windstorms also affect economic spruce forests, where is usually a tendency to remove fallen timber for economic gain and for the prevention of fire and bark beetle calamity. Naturally, windthrow has an important impact on the soil fauna. This work deals with impact of windstorm on centipede communities in High and West Tatra Mts. with an interest to explain, which windthrow management in spruce forest is more suitable for centipedes. Reference areas and areas with different management were established for the sampling primarily in the years 2007 to 2009. Heat extraction of soil samples was used for evaluation of abundances and pitfall traps for evaluation of epigeic activity of centipedes. Totally, 2535 individuals of 14 species were identified. The collected data can be partially concluded that non-intervention management had positive influence on the abundance of centipedes 5 years after the windstorm, compared with timber-removed stands.

10aChilopoda10adisturbance10aNorway spruce10apolom10asmrk10aTatras10aTatry10avichřice10awindstorm10awindthrow1 aVaverka, Miroslav uhttp://myriapoda.upol.cz/tuf/pdf/papers/Vaverka2020.pdf