16756nas a2200217 45000080041000002450087000412100069001282600015001973000012002124900007002245201607400231653001416305653001316319653001416332653001316346653001316359100003116372700003116403700002516434856007916459 2022 eng d00aChecklist of myriapods (Arthropoda: Myriapoda) from the colombian Caribbean region0 aChecklist of myriapods Arthropoda Myriapoda from the colombian C c31/12/2022 a277-2890 v173 a

Abstract: Based on the available literature and a review of collections of organisms, a checklist of 69 myriapod species was made for the Colombian Caribbean region; two symphyls, 15 Chilopods, and 52 Diplopods. In total, 20 families (one from Symphyla, five from Chilopoda, and 14 from Diplopoda), from 11 orders (one from Symphyla, three from Chilopoda, and seven from Diplopoda). Each species's geographical range by department, altitud, reference collection, and bibliographic source were included. The presence in Colombian collections of diplopod specimens that are new records of their taxonomic group for the region, such as Chondrodesmus cf. riparius (Chelodesmidae), two species of Fuhrmannodesmidae, three of Paradoxosomatidae and one of Lophoproctidae. Likewise, two species of Scolopendrellidae of the class Symphyla. This demonstrates the urgent need to complete the essential diversity inventories of the main groups of organisms in the face of the alarming environmental deterioration to which the Colombian Caribbean region is subjected.

Lista de miriápodos (Arthropoda: Myriapoda) de la región Caribe colombiana

Resumen: Con base en la literatura disponible, y revisión de colecciones de organismos, se realizó una lista de chequeo de 69 especies de miriápodos para la región Caribe colombiana; dos sinfilos, 15 quilópodos y 52 diplópodos. En total 20 familias (una de Symphyla, cinco de Chilopoda y 14 de Diplopoda), pertenecientes a 11 órdenes (uno de Symphyla, tres de Chilopoda y siete de Diplopoda). Para cada especie se incluyó su ámbito geográfico por departamentos, ámbito altitudinal, colección de referencia y fuente bibliográfica. Se confirmó la presencia en colecciones colombianas de especímenes de diplópodos que son nuevos registros de su grupo taxonómico para la región, como Chondrodesmus cf. riparius (Chelodesmidae), dos especies de Fuhrmannodesmidae, tres de Paradoxosomatidae y una de Lophoproctidae. Asimismo, dos especies de Scolopendrellidae de la clase Symphyla. Esto demuestra la imperiosa necesidad de completar los inventarios básicos de diversidad de los principales grupos de organismos ante el alarmante deterioro ambiental al que está sometida la región Caribe colombiana.

Recommended citation: Carrillo-Pallares, M., Martínez-Torres, D., Navas-S, G. R. (2022): Checklist of myriapods (Arthropoda: Myriapoda) from the colombian Caribbean region. Intropica, 17 (2): 277-289. https://doi.og/10.21676/23897864.4604

10aChilopoda10aColombia10aDiplopoda10aSymphyla10aTaxonomy1 aCarrillo-Pallares, Martín1 aMartínez-Torres, Daniella1 aNavas-S, Gabriel, R. uhttps://revistas.unimagdalena.edu.co/index.php/intropica/article/view/460404243nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245010600055210006900161260001500230300000800245490000600253520352600259653002903785653001403814653001403828653003303842100003303875700001903908700001903927700002303946856004403969 2022 eng d a2535-089700aMobilizing and Enhancing Legacy Biodiversity Data: The case of Karl Wilhelm Verhoeff's correspondence0 aMobilizing and Enhancing Legacy Biodiversity Data The case of Ka c23/08/2022 a1-30 v63 a

A considerable amount of biological data is preserved as physical documents, the legacy of former explorers, collectors, researchers, and others. Mobilizing data from handwritten documents has been considered particularly challenging, with well-known cases such as the manual transcription of specimen labels and herbarium sheets by museum staff, or crowdsourced transcription of data card collections through online platforms. Here we present a pipeline of open-source software that can be used to automatically transcribe handwritten text, make it publicly available, annotate it with e.g., scientific names, extract names in Darwin Core Archive (DwC-A) for third-party reuse, and automatically recognize named entities in the machine-readable text. automatically transcribe handwritten text, make it publicly available, annotate it with e.g., scientific names, extract names in Darwin Core Archive (DwC-A) for third-party reuse, and automatically recognize named entities in the machine-readable text. We based our use case on the correspondence of the German zoologist Karl Wilhelm Verhoeff, related to the Myriapoda collection held at the Musée Zoologique de Strasbourg. The documents were processed with Transkribus (Muehlberger et al. 2019), a mostly open-source virtual research environment (OS VRE), which allows text in images to be converted into machine-readable text amenable to semantic enrichment. We achieved a character error rate as low as 5%, a remarkable result for handwritten material, as an accuracy higher than 95% for printed material is acceptable (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 2016). We then used Myriatrix (Martínez-Muñoz 2019), an instance of the Scratchpads OS VRE (Smith et al. 2011), to create bibliographic references, publish the full text, and annotate the correspondence with scientific names of myriapods. During the process, we added new scientific name spellings and combinations to the taxonomic backbone of Myriatrix and exported the full taxon classification in DwC-A via the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) for reuse by the Global Names Architecture and its open-source tools (Patterson et al. 2016, Mozzherin et al. 2017). As a next step we are planning to subject the corrected text from Transkribus to a specific text-preprocessing workflow combining natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) techniques (Lücking et al. 2021). This includes, inter alia, a multiple annotation approach for general and bioscientific term classification in order to detect the respective entities automatically. The workflow has been developed in the framework of the Specialized Information Service Biodiversity Research (Koch et al. 2017) to make biodiversity information available via a customized and (bio-)ontology-based semantic search engine (Pachzelt et al. 2021). We recommend our comprehensive approach to natural history institutions seeking to efficiently digitize and mobilize the rich biological data present in their archival documents.

10abiodiversity informatics10aChilopoda10aDiplopoda10ahandwritten text recognition1 aMartínez-Muñoz, Carlos, A.1 aHuff, Dorothee1 aMeister, Marie1 aDriller, Christine uhttps://biss.pensoft.net/article/93679/04163nas a2200277 4500008004100000245009200041210007200133260007100205300000700276520333800283653001403621653001603635653001503651653001403666653001503680653001303695653001403708653001403722653001403736653001403750653001303764653001603777653001603793100002203809856005403831 2020 eng d00aKaryotypová variabilita stonožkovců (Myriapoda) / Karyotype variability of Myriapoda0 aKaryotypová variabilita stonožkovců Myriapoda Karyotype variabil aPraguebUniverzita Karlova, Přírodovědecká fakultac13/07/2020 a383 a

Abstrakt: Bakalářská práce pojednává o diploidních počtech chromozomů, jejich morfologii a chromozomovém mechanismu určení pohlaví u čtyřech tříd podkmene Myriapoda. Pozornost je zároveň věnována vzájemným fylogenetickým vztahům v rámci podkmene. Přehled literatury ukazuje míru prozkoumanosti cytogenetických charakteristik u jednotlivých tříd, která je zejména ve třídách Pauropoda a Symphyla stále velmi nízká a v rámci třídy Diplopoda je stále ještě velké množství řádů, kde nám tyto informace zcela chybí. Cytogenetické analýzy odhalily celkové rozpětí počtu chromozomů pro: Pauropoda 2n = 12 – 27, Symphyla 2n = 11 – 18, Chilopoda 2n = 14 – 54 a Diplopoda 2n = 8 – 30. V rámci všech čtyř tříd se vyskytují jak morfologicky nediferencované pohlavní chromozomy, tak systémy typu XX/XY a XX/X0. Navíc je u řádu Spirostreptida uváděný i systém X1X1X2X2/X1X20. Pouze u malého množství druhů z řádů Glomerida, Calipodida, Julida, Spirostreptida a Lithobiomorpha a čeledi Scutigerellidae se podařilo identifikovat výskyt NORů. V práci se také podařilo identifikovat některé neshody mezi údaji různých prací, kdy se ukazuje, že zejména některé starší studie byly postaveny na špatném pozorování chromozomů v karyotypu.

Karyotype variability of Myriapoda

Abstract: The bachelor thesis deals with diploid numbers of chromosomes, their morphology and chromosome mechanism of sex determination in four classes of the subphylum Myriapoda. Attention is also paid to mutual phylogenetic relationships within the subphylum. A review of the literature shows the degree of examination of cytogenetic characteristics in individual classes, which is still very low, especially in the classes Pauropoda and Symphyla, and within the class Diplopoda there are still a large number of orders where we completely lack this information. Cytogenetic analyzes revealed a total range of chromosome numbers for: Pauropoda 2n = 12 - 27, Symphyla 2n = 11 - 18, Chilopoda 2n = 14 - 54 and Diplopoda 2n = 8 - 30. Within all four classes, there are both morphologically undifferentiated sex chromosomes and XX/XY and XX/X0 systems. In addition, the X1X1X2X2/X1X20 system is mentioned for the order Spirostreptida. Only a small number of species from the orders Glomerida, Calipodida, Julida, Spirostreptida, Lithobiomorpha and from family Scutigerellidae were able to identify the occurrence of NORs. The work also managed to identify some discrepancies between the data of different works, which shows that especially some older studies were based on poor observation of chromosomes in the karyotype.

10aChilopoda10achromosomes10achromozomy10aDiplopoda10afylogeneze10akaryotyp10akaryotype10aMyriapoda10aPauropoda10aphylogeny10aSymphyla10avariabilita10avariability1 aKášová, Adéla uhttps://dspace.cuni.cz/handle/20.500.11956/11972503709nas a2200349 4500008004100000022001400041245014200055210006900197260001500266300001200281490000800293520259400301653002702895653001402922653001402936653001202950653002102962653001502983100002802998700002803026700002303054700002303077700002603100700002003126700003003146700002303176700002403199700001803223700002203241700002903263856006703292 2019 eng d a0929-139300aChoosing sampling methods for Chilopoda, Diplopoda and Isopoda (Oniscidea): A case study for ferruginous landscapes in Brazilian Amazonia0 aChoosing sampling methods for Chilopoda Diplopoda and Isopoda On c02/08/2019 a181-1910 v1433 a

The edaphic fauna plays an important role in the organic matter dynamics of the soil. Millipeds (Diplopoda), centipeds (Chilopoda) and isopods (Isopoda) are among the main components of the soil fauna. Vegetation structure represents one of the main factors influencing composition and diversity of these species that inhabit leaf litter and soil, what is particularly important in the Amazon Forest, where there are several singular vegetation types. Savannah and forest areas stand out in ferruginous hills, which represents one of the most poorly known and highly threatened ecosystems in the Amazon. However, sampling the edaphic fauna in high diversity sites represents a challenging task. Studies have shown that sampling method may influence observed patterns of diversity. From this perspective, the present study aimed to (i) investigate whether assemblages of Chilopoda, Diplopoda and Isopoda differ between vegetation types in the Amazon, (ii) indicate how biological parameters behave in such communities, (iii) identify which method or combination of methods is better suited to sample species richness and (iv) quantify the efficiency of each method regarding time of work and cost. Sampling was conducted by means of hand collection, leaf litter collection, hay-bait traps and soil sampling in four patches, two in the savannah (also called canga) and two in the forest. Richness was higher in forest habitats for Chilopoda and Diplopoda, while for Isopoda there was no significant difference. Species composition also differed between vegetation types for Chilopoda and Isopoda, but not for Diplopoda. Beta diversity between vegetation types was mainly determined by nestedness and balancing, while turnover was the main beta diversity component responsible for differences among methods. Soil sampling and hand collection added more species to the samples, therefore, this combination was the most efficient to access diversity. Our results support the hypothesis that differences in the soil cover promoted by distinct vegetation types influence the species diversity and composition of edaphic fauna. The differences were mainly determined by nestedness and balancing, indicating that the fauna sampled in the canga represents a subset of those present in the surrounding forest. In this sense, even in ecosystems with distinct vegetation types, the combination of soil and surface sampling methods is recommended. Lastly, the present study proposes a set of decision rules and a key to select the most appropriate method to sample the studied taxonomic groups.

10aAmazonian biodiversity10aChilopoda10aDiplopoda10aIsopoda10aSampling methods10aSoil fauna1 ade Oliveira, Marcus, PA1 aBastos-Pereira, Rafaela1 aTorres, Silvia, HS1 aPereira, Thaís, S1 aBatista, Fagner, Már1 aAlves, João, P1 aIniesta, Luiz, Felipe Mor1 aBouzan, Rodrigo, S1 aChagas-Jr, Amazonas1 aProus, Xavier1 aPietrobon, Thadeu1 aFerreira, Rodrigo, Lopes uhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S092913931831140502775nas a2200373 4500008004100000020002200041022001400063245012100077210007300198260001500271300002500286490000700311520166500318653001301983653001201996653002002008653001402028653001502042653001902057653001402076653001502090653001502105653001602120653002402136653001402160653001402174653002102188653001302209653001702222100001802239700001802257700002002275856010602295 2020 eng d a978-80-7620-066-1 a0231-580700aVybrané skupiny živočichů a rostlin louky Na Hupech, biologicky a rekreačně cenné lokality v Praze-Modřanech0 aVybrané skupiny živočichů a rostlin louky Na Hupech biologicky a c21/12/2020 a79–115 + 350–3510 v363 a

Selected animal and plant taxa of the Na Hupech meadow, a biologically and recreationally valuable site in Prague-Modřany (Central Bohemia)

Abstract: The Na Hupech meadow in Prague-Modřany is an important site for both biodiversity and well-being of local people. A survey conducted by the authors there in 2018–2020 revealed 90 spider, three harvestman, three false scorpion, eight millipede, two centipede, seven woodlice, 47 leaf- and planthopper, 66 true bug, 37 beetle, three amphibian, three reptilian and 88 vascular plant species. Among them, the silvaniid beetle Airaphilus elongatus is considered Critically Endangered according to the Czech Red List; true bug Ceraleptus gracilicornis, beetle Agyrtes bicolor and frog Bufotes viridis are Endangered; spider Nematogmus sanguinolentus, true bug Galeatus maculatus, beetle Tropinota hirta, frog Bufo bufo and lizard Lacerta agilis are vulnerable species. Beetles Oxythyrea funesta and Tropinota hirta, frogs Bufo bufo, Bufotes viridis and Rana dalmatina, lizards Anguis fragilis and Lacerta agilis and snake Natrix natrix are specially protected species according to the Czech law. In addition, Thyreocoris fulvipennis (Heteroptera: Thyreocoridae) has been recorded there for the first time in Bohemia. Due to its rich biodiversity and occurrence of protected and threatened species, the site should be maintained in its current state and protected against construction activities.

10aAmphibia10aAraneae10aAuchenorrhyncha10aChilopoda10aColeoptera10aCzech Republic10aDiplopoda10afaunistics10afloristics10aHeteroptera10amultitaxa inventory10aOniscidea10aOpiliones10aPseudoscorpiones10aReptilia10aTracheophyta1 aDolejš, Petr1 aZeman, Šimon1 aMoravec, Jiří uhttps://strednicechy.ochranaprirody.cz/akce-publikace/bohemia-centralis-sbornik/bohemia-centralis-36/02455nas a2200313 4500008004100000022001400041245006800055210006700123260001500190300000900205490000600214520163400220653001401854653001501868653001401883653001501897653001601912653001401928653002501942653001501967653000901982653001801991653001002009653001102019100002202030700002202052700002402074856004302098 2020 eng d a1314-283600aSoil invertebrates occurrences in European North-East of Russia0 aSoil invertebrates occurrences in European NorthEast of Russia c30/11/2020 a1-160 v83 a

Background: The European North-East of Russia is the territory which includes the Nenets Autonomous District, represented by the East European tundra (from Kanin Peninsula to Vaigach Island), Komi Republic with its taiga ecosystems and the Urals (Northern, SubPolar and Polar). Over 20 years of systematic studies of soil fauna in the studied region has resulted in a huge amount of data being accumulated that can be analysed from different positions. Considering that the representation of Russian soil biota data, especially from European North-East of Russia in the GBIF database is not large, our data are of great interest to the scientific world community. The accumulation of such data will solve questions on national and global scales using large arrays.

This study produced a dataset containing information on occurrences on soil invertebrates (Lumbricidae, Chilopoda, Diplopoda, Collembola, Elateridae and Staphylinidae) in the European North-East of Russia. The dataset summarises occurrences noted in natural and disturbed forests, tundra and mountain ecosystems.

New information: Data from 196 geo-referenced localities of European North-East of Russia (tundra, taiga and mountains ecosystems) have been collated. A total of 5412 occurrences are included in the resource. The current project surveys 13 species of earthworms, 20 species of millipedes, 246 species of springtails, 446 species of rove beetles and 60 species of click beetles. The diversity of soil invertebrates in the European North-East of Russia has not been fully explored and further exploration will lead to more taxa.

10aChilopoda10aCollembola10aDiplopoda10aElateridae10aLumbricidae10amountains10aNorth-East of Europe10aoccurrence10asoil10aStaphylinidae10ataiga10atundra1 aKonakova, Tatyana1 aKolesnikova, Alla1 aTaskaeva, Anastasia uhttps://bdj.pensoft.net/article/58836/00602nas a2200121 4500008004100000245015200041210006900193300001400262100002800276700002100304700001700325856013800342 2009 eng d00aAbout isolated and compound epidermal glands in Myriapoda and their determination as a new potential tool to resolve euarthropod interrelationships0 aAbout isolated and compound epidermal glands in Myriapoda and th a126–1261 aMüller, Carsten, H. G.1 aRosenberg, Jörg1 aHilken, Gero uhttps://myriatrix.myspecies.info/content/about-isolated-and-compound-epidermal-glands-myriapoda-and-their-determination-new-potential01478nas a2200265 4500008004100000022001400041245002400055210002400079260001500103300001200118490000800130520082600138653002800964653002000992653001501012653001401027653001401041653001501055653001401070653001301084100002201097700002401119700002201143856004701165 2019 eng d a1313-298900aMyriapoda of Canada0 aMyriapoda of Canada c24/01/2019 a169-1860 v8193 a

The currently documented fauna of described species of myriapods in Canada includes 54 Chilopoda, 66 Diplopoda, 23 Pauropoda, and two Symphyla, representing increases of 24, 23, 23, and one species, respectively, since 1979. Of the 145 myriapod species currently documented, 40 species are not native to Canada. The myriapods have not been well documented with DNA barcodes and no barcodes are available for Pauropoda. It is conservatively estimated that at least 93 additional myriapods species will be discovered in Canada: Chilopoda (40), Diplopoda (29), Pauropoda (17), and Symphyla (seven). In general, there is a serious dearth of knowledge about myriapods in Canada, and systematics research and surveys continue to be needed to help document the diversity and distribution of these groups in the country.

10abiodiversity assessment10aBiota of Canada10acentipedes10aChilopoda10aDiplopoda10amillipedes10aPauropoda10aSymphyla1 aLangor, David, W.1 adeWaard, Jeremy, R.1 aSnyder, Bruce, A. uhttps://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/29447/01924nas a2200217 4500008004100000245012000041210006900161260001200230300001400242490000700256520127800263653001401541653001501555653001401570653001101584653001201595653001301607100002001620700001701640856004901657 2018 eng d00aChecklist of the Myriapoda in Cretaceous Burmese amber and a correction of the Myriapoda identified by Zhang (2017)0 aChecklist of the Myriapoda in Cretaceous Burmese amber and a cor c12/2020 a1131-11400 v143 a

An inventory of the Myriapoda (Diplopoda, Chilopoda, Symphyla) from Cretaceous Burmese amber, Myanmar, is presented, including the oldest and/or first fossil record for numerous orders. For millipedes (Diplopoda) 527 records, including 460 new specimens determined by us, belonging to 13 of 16 recent orders are listed: Polyxenida, Glomeridesmida, Glomerida, Siphonophorida, Polyzoniida, Platydesmida, Siphoniulida, Chordeumatida, Polydesmida, Stemmiulida, Callipodida, Spirostreptida and Spirobolida. For centipedes, 33 records for 4 of the 5 recent orders are listed: Scutigeromorpha, Lithobiomorpha, Scolopendromorpha and Geophilomorpha. For Symphyla, three records for both families, Scutigerellidae and Scolopendrellidae, are listed. The majority of Diplopoda records (30.5%) are Polydesmida. The record of the Polyzoniida includes first instar octopod juveniles. The checklist includes the first fossil representatives known of the Platydesmida, as well as the oldest known fossils of the Polyxenida, Glomeridesmida, Glomerida, Siphonophorida, Polyzoniida, Siphoniulida, Spirostreptida, as well as both Symphyla families. Misidentifications by Zhang (2017) are corrected; while most Chilopoda in that list are correct, almost all Diplopoda are misidentified.

10aChilopoda10aCretaceous10aDiplopoda10afossil10aMyanmar10aSymphyla1 aWesener, Thomas1 aMoritz, Leif uhttps://checklist.pensoft.net/article/30320/03060nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245010900055210006900164260001500233300001200248490000800260520235000268653001402618653001402632653000802646653001402654653002302668100002202691700002002713700002102733700001702754856004702771 2020 eng d a1313-298900aSubterranean biodiversity and depth distribution of myriapods in forested scree slopes of Central Europe0 aSubterranean biodiversity and depth distribution of myriapods in c28/04/2020 a117-1370 v9303 a

The shallow underground of rock debris is a unique animal refuge. Nevertheless, the research of this habitat lags far behind the study of caves and soil, due to technical and time-consuming demands. Data on Myriapoda in scree habitat from eleven localities in seven different geomorphological units of the Czech and Slovak Republics were processed. Based on previous studies, as well as knowledge of cave and soil fauna, it was hypothesised that the occurrence of a varied and peculiar fauna would show a pattern of depth distribution with variations due to local specificities. From 2005–2016 (at least one year on each site), macrofauna was collected via sets of three long-term exposed subterranean traps consisting of 110 cm long perforated tube, with ten cups located in a gradient at 5–95 cm below the soil surface. In total, 14 symphylans (not identified to species level), 271 centipedes (23 spp.) and 572 millipedes (32 spp.) were sampled. The overall depth distribution of centipedes and millipedes appeared to have relatively similar pattern, with both groups being found at all depth levels. Nevertheless, this pattern depends on locations. The depth distribution trend lines are mostly in the form of an asymmetric ‘U’, with decreased abundance until the middle of the gradient, followed by increase in the deepest levels. Epigeic species were sporadically distributed along the whole depth gradient, but concentrated at the soil surface, while some subterranean species, such as the centipede Lithobius lucifugus and the millipedes Geoglomeris subterranea, Cibiniulus slovacus and Archiboreoiulus pallidus, were recorded in the deepest parts of the gradient. This characterises the debris community as a mixture of soil and subterranean species with an absence of species exclusively found in caves. The use of different fixation methods in traps had a significant and selective impact on samples; millipedes were either attracted by ethylene glycol or repelled by formaldehyde. Centipedes were also captured more frequently in ethylene glycol; however, the species composition varied in each of the fixatives. Depth distribution of myriapods was similar in both fixative solutions. Traps with these fixatives could be recommended for similar ecological studies.

10aChilopoda10aDiplopoda10aMSS10aMyriapoda10asubterranean traps1 aHaľková, Beáta1 aTuf, Ivan, Hán1 aTajovský, Karel1 aMock, Andrej uhttps://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/48914/02013nas a2200253 4500008004100000022001400041245010700055210006900162260001500231300001400246490000800260520125800268653002101526653000901547653001401556653001401570653002301584653002101607100002201628700001701650700002501667700002001692856004701712 2020 eng d a1313-298900aCharacter of woodland fragments affects distribution of myriapod assemblages in agricultural landscape0 aCharacter of woodland fragments affects distribution of myriapod c28/04/2020 a139 - 1510 v9303 a

Fragments of woodland fulfil many irreplaceable functions in the agricultural landscape including being the main source of biodiversity of soil invertebrates. Due to intensive farming and land use changes, especially in the second half of the 20th century, fragments of woodland in agricultural landscape almost disappeared. This has led to a decrease in the diversity of invertebrates, especially those for which the presence of these woodland habitats in the landscape is a key element for survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of fragments of woodland (characterised by their area, vegetation structure, the amount of leaf litter layer and soil moisture) on the distribution of centipedes and millipedes (Myriapoda) in the agricultural landscape of South Moravia (Czech Republic). Myriapods were collected using pitfall traps during summer in 2016 and 2017. Results showed that activity-density of myriapods is positively correlated with thickness of the leaf litter layer. Moreover, the species richness of centipedes is positively correlated with increasing size of fragments of woodland although higher centipedes’ activity-density was found in rather uniform woodlands in term of diversity of tree species.

10aactivity-density10aarea10aChilopoda10aDiplopoda10alandscape elements10aspecies richness1 aHorňák, Ondřej1 aMock, Andrej1 aŠarapatka, Bořivoj1 aTuf, Ivan, Hán uhttps://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/48586/02552nas a2200301 4500008004100000022001400041245010100055210006900156260001500225300001200240490000800252520168600260653001501946653001401961653001401975653001501989653002302004653001402027653002002041653001302061653002302074100002602097700001802123700001702141700002502158700002002183856004702203 2020 eng d a1313-298900aConservation of terrestrial invertebrates: a review of IUCN and regional Red Lists for Myriapoda0 aConservation of terrestrial invertebrates a review of IUCN and r c28/04/2020 a221-2290 v9303 a

Red Listing of Threatened species is recognized as the most objective approach for evaluating extinction risk of living organisms which can be applied at global or national scales. Invertebrates account for nearly 97% of all animals on the planet but are insufficiently represented in the IUCN Red Lists at both scales. To analyze the occurrence of species present in regional Red Lists, accounts of 48 different countries and regions all over the world were consulted and all data about myriapods (Myriapoda) ever assessed in Red Lists at any level assembled. Myriapod species assessments were found in eleven regional Red Lists; however, no overlap between the species included in the global IUCN Red List and the regional ones was established. This means that myriapod species considered threatened at regional level may not be eligible for international funding specific for protection of native threatened species (more than US$ 25 million were available in the last decade) as most financial instruments tend to support only threatened species included in the IUCN Red List. As the lack of financial resources may limit protection for species in risk of extinction, it is urgent to increase the possibilities of getting financial support for implementation of measures for their protection. A Red List of all Myriapoda species recorded in Red Lists at national or local (596) and global (210) scales totaling 806 species is presented. This list shows for the first time an overview of the current conservation status of Myriapoda species. Here, the urgent need of establishing a Myriapoda Specialist Group in the Species Survival Commission of IUCN is also stressed.

10aArthropoda10aChilopoda10aDiplopoda10aextinction10anational red lists10aPauropoda10arisk assessment10aSymphyla10athreatened species1 aKaram-Gemael, Manoela1 aDecker, Peter1 aStoev, Pavel1 aMarques, Marinez, I.1 aJr, Amazonas, C uhttps://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/48943/