01108nas a2200133 4500008004100000245004600041210004300087260001200130300001200142490000700154520074100161100002000902856005200922 1843 eng d00aOn some new genera of the class Myriapoda0 asome new genera of the class Myriapoda c02/1843 a177-1810 v103 a

Recommended citation: Newport, G. (1843) [1842]: On some new genera of the class Myriapoda. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 10 (119): 177-181. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/244439

Bibliographic remarks: This work has an exact duplicate. Newport, George (1843): On some new Genera of the Class Myriapoda. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, including Zoology, Botany and Geology, ser. 1, 11 (73): 498-502. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/18642403 [01/06/1843]

Publication date remarks: The article was read on December 13, 1842. Part X bears the date 1842. Number CXIX was printed in February 1843.

1 aNewport, George uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/24443900940nas a2200145 4500008004100000022001400041245005600055210005100111260001500162300001200177490000700189520052400196100002000720856005400740 1843 eng d a0374-548100aOn some new Genera of the Class Myriapoda [reprint]0 asome new Genera of the Class Myriapoda reprint c01/06/1843 a498-5020 v113 a

Recommended citation: Newport, G. (1843): On some new Genera of the Class Myriapoda. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, including Zoology, Botany and Geology, ser. 1, 11 (73): 498-502. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/18642403

Bibliographic remark: Reprinted from the Proceedings of the Zoological Society for Dec. 13, 1842.

Publication date remarks: The printed date is July 1843. The publication date is 01/06/1843.

1 aNewport, George uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/1864240302439nas a2200133 4500008004100000022004600041245004300087210003900130260006400169300001200233520200200245100001902247856003902266 2019 eng d a978-952-11-4973-3, ISBN 978-952-11-4974-000aTuhatjalkaiset - Myriapods - Myriapoda0 aTuhatjalkaiset Myriapods Myriapoda aHelsinkibYmpäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus a340-3433 a

Viittausohje, kun viitataan yksittäiseen Punaisen listan lukuun: Vahtera, V. 2019. Tuhatjalkaiset. Julk.: Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. (toim.) 2019. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus – Punainen kirja 2019. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus. Helsinki. S. 340-343. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Reference of a separate chapter of the Red List: Vahtera, V. 2019. Myriapods. In: Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. (eds.) 2019. The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species. Ministry of the Environment & Finnish Environment Institute. Helsinki. P. 340-343. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Summary: Myriapoda are a diverse group of terrestrial arthropods, some of which are herbivores, some predators and some decomposers. There are four classes of Myriapoda: centipedes (Chilopoda), millipedes (Diplopoda), pauropods (Pauropoda), and symphylans (Symphyla). In Finland, a total of 63 species have been found: 21 centipede, 28 millipede, eight pauropod, and six symphylan species. In total, there are ten red-listed species: the critically endangered (CR) Geophilus carpophagus, which was classified as Regionally Extinct (RE) in the two previous assessments, and the Near Threatened (NT) species G. electricus, G. truncorum and Julus scanicus. These species only have one known locality each, and no new observations have been made of the three Near Threatened (NT) species for a long time. Six species have been categorised as Data Deficient (DD). Many species were classified as Not Evaluated (NE) due to insufficient information on their occurrence. While no monitoring of Myriapoda has been organised in Finland, the information on the spread of the species in this country could be updated by organising a monitoring study of a few years in duration.

1 aVahtera, Varpu uhttp://hdl.handle.net/10138/29950108893nam a2200337 4500008004100000022004600041245005500087210005100142260006400193300000800257520789800265653001508163653002808178653001708206653000908223653002108232653001908253653001308272653001408285653001908299653002208318653002308340653002208363653002608385100002108411700001808432700002108450700002208471700002308493856003908516 2019 eng d a978-952-11-4973-3, ISBN 978-952-11-4974-000aSuomen lajien uhanalaisuus – Punainen kirja 20190 aSuomen lajien uhanalaisuus Punainen kirja 2019 aHelsinkibYmpäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus a7043 a

Tiivistelmä: Julkaisussa esitellään Suomen lajien viides uhanalaisuusarviointi. Suomen lajimäärän arvioidaan nykyään olevan vähintään 48 000. Riittävät tiedot uhanalaisuusarviointiin oli 22 418 lajista tai alemmasta taksonista, mikä on noin 47 % lajistosta. Uhanalaisiksi arvioitiin 2 668 lajia tai alempaa taksonia eli noin 11,9 % arvioiduista lajeista. Punaisen listan lajeja, joihin kuuluvat uhanalaisten lisäksi hävinneet, silmälläpidettävät ja puutteellisesti tunnetut on yhteensä 6 683 (29,8 %). Arvioiduista lajeista äärimmäisen uhanalaisia (CR) on 489, erittäin uhanalaisia (EN) 918, vaarantuneita (VU) 1 260, silmälläpidettäviä (NT) 1 912, puutteellisesti tunnettuja (DD) 1 792, hävinneitä (RE) 312 ja elinvoimaisia (LC) 15 735. Arviointi tehtiin Kansainvälisen luonnonsuojeluliiton (IUCN) ohjeiden ja kriteerien mukaan. IUCN:n alueellisen uhanalaisuusarvioinnin kriteerit perustuvat lajien havaittuun, arvioituun, pääteltyyn tai ennustettuun populaatioiden pienenemiseen, levinneisyys- tai esiintymisalueen kokoon, pieneen ja jatkuvasti taantuvaan tai hyvin pieneen populaatioon tai kvantitatiiviseen analyysiin. Lisäksi Suomessa on dokumentoitu lajien elinympäristöt sekä uhanalaisuuden syyt ja uhkatekijät. Enemmistö uhanalaisista lajeista elää metsissä (31 %) sekä perinneympäristöissä ja muissa ihmisen muuttamissa ympäristöissä (24 %). Uhanalaisten osuus kunkin elinympäristön arvioiduista lajeista on korkein tunturipaljakalla (37,9 %). Uhanalaisten lajien määrä on suurin hemiboreaalisella ja eteläboreaalisella vyöhykkeellä Etelä-Suomessa. Julkaisussa vertaillaan arvioinnin tuloksia vuoden 2010 tuloksiin esimerkiksi uhanalaisuusindeksin avulla. Lisäksi julkaisussa tarkastellaan vuoden 2010 uhanalaisuusarvioinnin ohjausryhmän ehdotusten toteutumista. Arvioinnin tulosten pohjalta Eliölajien uhanalaisuuden arvioinnin ohjausryhmä (LAUHA) esittää 13 toimenpide-ehdotusta uhanalaisten lajien suojelun, hoidon, tutkimuksen ja seurannan järjestämiseksi ja rahoittamiseksi. Arvioinnit on tehty eliöryhmäkohtaisissa työryhmissä ja työn tulokset esitellään eliöryhmittäin 39 luvussa.

Viittausohje, kun viitataan koko julkaisuun: Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. (toim.) 2019. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus – Punainen kirja 2019. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus. Helsinki. 704 s. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Sammandrag: I denna bok presenteras resultat av Finlands femte hotbedömning. Finlands artantal uppskattas för tillfället till minst 48 000. Tillräckliga uppgifter för hotbedömning fanns om 22 418 arter eller lägre taxa, vilket utgör 47 % av alla arter. Av dessa bedömdes 2 667 arter eller lägre taxa vara hotade, d.v.s. 11,9 %. Rödlistade arter, som förutom hotade arter även innefattar försvunna arter, nära hotade arter och arter som det råder kunskapsbrist om, uppgår till 6 683 (29,8 %). Av de bedömda arterna är 498 akut hotade (CR), 918 starkt hotade (EN), 1 260 sårbara (VU), 1 912 nära hotade (NT), 1 792 med kunskapsbrist (DD), 312 försvunna (RE) och 15 735 livskraftiga. Hoten har bedömts på basis av Internationella Naturvårdsunionens (IUCN) regionala hotbedömningskriterier. Kriterierna grundar sig på observerad, deduktiv eller estimerad minskning av populationer eller utbrednings- och förekomstområden, en liten och kontinuerligt minskande eller en mycket liten population eller på kvantitativ analys. Därutöver har arternas livsmiljö, hotorsak och hotfaktorer i Finland dokumenterats. Majoriteten av de hotade arterna lever i skogar (31 %), vårdbiotoper och andra kulturmiljöer (24 %). Antalet hotade arter är högst inom den hemiboreala och sydboreala zonen i södra Finland. Andelen hotade arter i en specifik habitattyp är högst i kalfjället(37,9 %). I publikationen jämförs resultaten av hotbedömningen med resultaten från år 2010 t.ex. med hjälp av rödlisteindexet. Vid sidan av bedömningsresultaten beskrivs de mest påtagliga administrativa och juridiska åtgärder som vidtagits för artskydd samt forskning och övervakning sedan den föregående bedömningen. Hotbedömningens styrgrupp (LAUHA ) föreslår 13 åtgärder för organisering och finansiering av skydd, vård, forskning och övervakning av hotade arter. Resultaten av bedömningen som är genomförd av expertgrupper presenteras i 39 kapitel som omfattar olika organismgrupper.

The Red List of Finnish Species 2019

Abstract: This publication describes the fifth assessment of Finnish threatened species. The current estimated number of species in Finland is at least 48,000. Sufficient information was available for the evaluation of 22,418 species or lower taxa, which is approximately 47% of all species. In total, 2,667 species or lower taxa (11.9%) were assessed as threatened. The red-listed species, which, in addition to threatened species, include the species classified as Regionally Extinct, Near Threatened, and Data Deficient, total 6,683 (29.8%). Of the species evaluated, 489 were classified as Critically Endangered (CR), 918 as Endangered (EN), 1,260 as Vulnerable (VU), 1,912 as Near Threatened (NT), 1,792 as Data Deficient (DD), 312 as Regionally Extinct (RE), and 15,735 as of Least Concern (LC). The assessment was carried out in accordance with guidelines and criteria issued by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and applied in assessments at the regional level. These criteria are based on observed, estimated, inferred, or projected population size reduction; the extent of occurrence or area of occupancy; continuing decline in a small population or a very small size of population; or a quantitative analysis. In addition, species’ habitats, as well as causes of threat and threat factors, were documented in the Finnish evaluation. The majority of threatened species live in forests (31%) and in rural biotopes and other cultural habitats (24%). Of the species assessed the proportion of threatened species is highest in Alpine habitats (37.9%). The number of threatened species is highest in the hemiboreal and southern boreal zones in southern Finland. The results of the assessment are compared to the previous assessment 2010 for example with the Red List Index. In addition, proceedings of the proposals given by the steering group of the previous assessment are evaluated. The steering group of this assessment made 13 proposals for measures for the arrangement and financing of the conservation, management, research, and monitoring of threatened species. The results of the work of the expert groups responsible for the evaluation are presented in 39 organism group -specific sections.

Reference of the publication: Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. (eds.) 2019. The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus. Helsinki. 704 p. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Publication date: 26/02/2019

10abedömning10aconservation of species10ahotade arter10aIUCN10alajiston suojelu10apunainen lista10aRed list10arödlista10askydd av arter10athreat assessment10athreatened species10auhanalaiset lajit10auhanalaisuusarviointi1 aHyvärinen, Esko1 aJuslén, Aino1 aKemppainen, Eija1 aUddström, Annika1 aLiukko, Ulla-Maija uhttp://hdl.handle.net/10138/29950100703nas a2200157 4500008004100000022001400041050001400055245006400069210005400133260001500187300001000202490000700212520025900219100001700478856005000495 1896 eng d a0096-3801 aQ11.U555p00aOn Geophilus attenuatus, Say, of the class Chilopoda0 aiGeophilus attenuatusi Say of the class Chilopoda c23/04/1896 a59-620 v183 a

Recommended citation: Cook, O. F. (1896): On Geophilus attenuatus, Say, of the class Chilopoda. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 18 (1038): 59-62. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.18-1038.59

1 aCook, O., F. uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/568500771nas a2200097 4500008004100000245013100041210007000172520034200242100001500584856007400599 1857 eng d00aSystematische Aufzählung der Crustaceen, Arachniden und Miriapoden, welche ich bisher in der Umgebung von Trier gefunden habe0 aSystematische Aufzählung der Crustaceen Arachniden und Miriapode3 a

Recommended citation: Schnur, J. (1857): Systematische Aufzählung der Crustaceen, Arachniden und Miriapoden, welche ich bisher in der Umgebung von Trier gefunden habe. Jahresbericht der Gesellschaft für nützliche Forschungen zu Trier, 5: 53‑55. https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.43690.23

1 aSchnur, J. uhttps://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/diglit/jahresbericht_trier1856/005700419nas a2200133 4500008004100000022001400041245007200055210006000127260001500187300000800202490000600210100001700216856005200233 1794 eng d a1945-943200aRemarks on Scolopendra electrica, and Sc. subterranea0 aRemarks on iScolopendra electricai and iSc subterraneai c01/05/1794 a7-90 v21 aShaw, George uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/75983600569nam a2200145 4500008004100000050002100041245013900062210006900201250000700270260004900277300001300326490001000339100002200349856005200371 1767 eng d aQH43 .S97 1766x 00aSystema naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis.0 aSystema naturae per regna tria naturae secundum classes ordines  a12 aStockholmbImpensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii a533-13270 v1 (2)1 aLinnaeus, Carolus uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/13724001827nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245008600055210006900141260001500210300000900225490000600234520115100240653001501391653001801406653001201424653001301436653001501449653001101464100001801475700001901493700002401512856004901536 2014 eng d a1314-282800aMillipedes and centipedes in German greenhouses (Myriapoda: Diplopoda, Chilopoda)0 aMillipedes and centipedes in German greenhouses Myriapoda Diplop c11/04/2014 a1-430 v23 a

A review is given of all the literature records of millipedes and centipedes that have been found in German greenhouses together with additional records for 29 such sites. Species lists are given for 46 greenhouses investigated throughout Germany. Thirty-five diplopod and 18 chilopod species were found to occur in greenhouses, of which 15 (3 Chilopoda, 12 Diplopoda) are restricted to this type of habitat. First records for Germany include Anadenobolus monilicornis (Porat, 1876), Epinannolene cf. trinidadensis Chamberlin, 1918, Epinannolene sp., Mesoiulus gridellii Strasser, 1934, Leptogoniulus sorornus (Butler, 1876), Rhinotus purpureus (Pocock, 1894), Cryptops doriae Pocock, 1891, Lamyctes coeculus (Brölemann, 1889) and Tygarrup javanicus (Attems, 1907). The millipedes Oxidus gracilis (C. L. Koch, 1847) and Amphitomeus attemsi (Schubart, 1934) and the centipedes Lithobius forficatus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Cryptops hortensis (Donovan, 1810) are the species most frequently found in greenhouses.

10acentipedes10afirst records10aGermany10ahothouse10amillipedes10areview1 aDecker, Peter1 aReip, Hans, S.1 aVoigtländer, Karin uhttps://bdj.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=106602124nas a2200301 4500008004100000022002500041245007900066210006900145260001500214300001100229490000800240520123300248653001301481653001401494653001701508653001601525653001901541653002501560100001501585700002301600700002001623700002001643700002501663700002601688700002101714700001801735856006901753 2019 eng d a0012-9658, 1939-917000aA meta food web for invertebrate species collected in a European grassland0 ameta food web for invertebrate species collected in a European g c05/03/2019 ae026790 v1003 a

Patterns of feeding interactions between species are thought to influence the stability of communities and the flux of nutrients and energy through ecosystems. However, surprisingly few well-resolved food webs allow us to evaluate factors that influence the architecture of species interactions. We constructed a meta food web consisting of 714 invertebrate species collected over 9 years of suction and pitfall sampling campaigns in the Jena Experiment, a long-term grassland biodiversity experiment located in Jena, Germany. We summarize information on the 51,496 potential trophic links, which were established using information on diet specificity and species traits that typically constrain feeding interactions (trophic group, body size, and vertical stratification). The list of species identities, traits, and link-derivation rules will be useful not only for tests of plant diversity effects on food web structure within the Jena Experiment, but also for considering consistent construction of food webs from empirical data, and for comparisons of network structure across ecosystems. No copyright or proprietary restrictions are associated with the use of this data set other than citation of this Data Paper.

10afood web10agrassland10ainvertebrate10ameta-matrix10aspecies traits10atrophic interactions1 aHines, Jes1 aGiling, Darren, P.1 aRzanny, Michael1 aVoigt, Winfried1 aMeyer, Sebastian, T.1 aWeisser, Wolfgang, W.1 aEisenhauer, Nico1 aEbeling, Anne uhttps://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.267901593nas a2200145 4500008004100000022001400041245005500055210005300110260001500163300001200178490000700190520117700197100002201374856005101396 1886 eng d a0003-049X00aMyriapoda Musei Cantabrigiensis. Part I. Chilopoda0 aMyriapoda Musei Cantabrigiensis Part I Chilopoda c27/03/1886 a161-2330 v233 a

Recommended citation: Meinert, F. (1886): Myriapoda Musei Cantabrigiensis. Part I. Chilopoda. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, held at Philadelphia, for promoting useful knowledge, 23 (122): 161-233. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.26797

Publication date remarks: The work by Meinert appeared in the Proceedings... volume 23, number 122. The number bears "April 1886" as the printed date, but the cover page of the copy at the Ernst Mayr Library, Harvard, bears the handwritten date "Mar. 27, 1886", which should be interpreted as a "no later than" date. The work by Meinert is the first in the number and encompasses signatures 2U-Z and 2A-D. Signatures 2U-V are dated as "December 17, 1885", signatures 2W-X as "December 16, 1885" (one day earlier), signatures 2Y-Z and 2A-B as "December 31, 1885", and signatures 2C-D as "January 21, 1886". At the moment, the chosen date in Myriatrix is 27/03/1886, following the cover page's handwritten date.

1 aMeinert, Frederik uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/2679700928nam a2200157 4500008004100000050002100041245013900062210006900201250000700270260004900277300000800326490000600334520035700340100002200697856005100719 1758 eng d aQK91.C58 1758-5900aSystema naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis.0 aSystema naturae per regna tria naturae secundum classes ordines  a10 aStockholmbImpensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii a8240 v13 a

Recommended citation: Linnaeus, C. (1758): Systema naturæ per Regna Tria naturæ, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, Cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. Editio decima, reformata. Tomus I. Impensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii, Holmiæ. 824 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542

1 aLinnaeus, Carolus uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/1027701547nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245009800055210006900153260001500222300001000237490000700247520069000254653001400944653002900958653001400987653002201001653002401023653002401047653001701071653001301088100000901101856019501110 2020 eng d a2057-057000aOpinion 2450: Geophilus alpinus Meinert, 1870 (Chilopoda): specific name not conserved0 aOpinion 2450 iGeophilus alpinusi Meinert 1870 Chilopoda specific c30/04/2020 a55-560 v773 a

The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has declined to use its plenary power to conserve the specific name of Geophilus alpinus Meinert, 1870 for a European species of geophilomorph centipede. As a result, the name impressus C.L. Koch, 1847 as published in the binomen Geophilus impressus has priority over the names palustris C.L. Koch, 1863, as published in the binomen Geophilus palustris and alpinus Meinert, 1870, as published in the binomen Geophilus alpinus whenever the former is considered synonymous with either of the latter.

10aChilopoda10ageophilomorph centipedes10aGeophilus10aGeophilus alpinus10aGeophilus impressus10aGeophilus palustris10anomenclature10aTaxonomy1 aICZN uhttps://bioone.org/journals/the-bulletin-of-zoological-nomenclature/volume-77/issue-1/bzn.v77.a016/Opinion-2450-Case-3673--Geophilus-alpinus-Meinert-1870-Chilopoda/10.21805/bzn.v77.a016.full01396nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245011000055210006900165260001200234490000700246520049400253653001400747653002900761653001400790653002200804653002400826653002400850653001700874653001300891100001800904700002400922856020800946 2015 eng d a2057-057000aCase 3673: Geophilus alpinus Meinert, 1870 (Chilopoda): proposed conservation of the specific name0 aCase 3673 iGeophilus alpinusi Meinert 1870 Chilopoda proposed co c03/20150 v723 a

The purpose of this application, under Article 23.9.3 of the Code, is to conserve the specific name Geophilus alpinus Meinert, 1870 for a widespread European species of geophilomorph centipedes. This name, currently in use, is threatened by the subjective synonyms Geophilus impressus C.L. Koch, 1847 and Geophilus palustris C.L. Koch, 1863, which have been disregarded since 1874 and 1882 respectively.

10aChilopoda10ageophilomorph centipedes10aGeophilus10aGeophilus alpinus10aGeophilus impressus10aGeophilus palustris10anomenclature10aTaxonomy1 aBonato, Lucio1 aMinelli, Alessandro uhttps://bioone.org/journals/the-bulletin-of-zoological-nomenclature/volume-72/issue-1/bzn.v72i1.a10/Case-3673Geophilus-alpinus-Meinert-1870-Chilopoda--proposed-conservation-of/10.21805/bzn.v72i1.a10.full01550nas a2200145 4500008004100000022001400041245009200055210006900147260001500216300001000231490000700241520102500248100002401273856010701297 2020 eng d a2513-944400aMyriapod Trivia - Curiosities of British Natural History & The Rabbit and the Centipede0 aMyriapod Trivia Curiosities of British Natural History The Rabbi c03/04/2020 a95-970 v323 a

Over the years with an interest in the more formal study of myriapods, especially centipedes, I have also accumulated a few items of what we might call "trivia" - prints, pictures etc. The two items here come into that category and I know there are many more like them around and they are offered as light relief for Bulletin readers. I know little about The Penny Magazine but it clearly represents a cheap, presumably weekly, publication dedicated to that great Victorian aim of "self improvement". This issue comprises eight pages with items as varied as "Essays on the lives of Remarkable Painters No.XXXI: Andrea del Sarto", "The English and Irish Ordnance Surveys" and "The Hareem of Ibrahim Pasha". I have abridged the item on Centipedes and Millipedes from the original three pages. "The Rabbit and the Centipede" comes from a children's book of 1907. I am not sure that it sheds any particular new light on myriapod locomotory mechanisms.

1 aBarber, Anthony, D. uhttps://www.bmig.org.uk/sites/www.bmig.org.uk/files/bulletin/BullBMIG32(2020)95-97_Myriapod-Trivia.pdf02448nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245008000055210006900135260001500204300000900219490000700228520175800235653001801993653002002011653001402031653002002045653002202065653002102087653001702108100002002125700001802145856004302163 2020 eng d a2075-445000aSoil Health and Arthropods: From Complex System to Worthwhile Investigation0 aSoil Health and Arthropods From Complex System to Worthwhile Inv c16/01/2020 a1-210 v113 a

The dramatic increase in soil degradation in the last few decades has led to the need to identify methods to define not only soil quality but also, in a holistic approach, soil health. In the past twenty years, indices based on living communities have been proposed alongside the already proven physical-chemical methods. Among them, some soil invertebrates have been included in monitoring programs as bioindicators of soil quality. Being an important portion of soil fauna, soil arthropods are involved in many soil processes such as organic matter decomposition and translocation, nutrient cycling, microflora activity regulation and bioturbation. Many studies have reported the use of soil arthropods to define soil quality; among taxa, some have been explored more in depth, typically Acari and Collembola, while generally less abundant groups, such as Palpigradi or Embioptera, have not been investigated much. This paper aims to evaluate and compare the use of different soil microarthropod taxa in soil degradation/quality studies to highlight which groups are the most reported for soil monitoring and which are the most sensitive to soil degradation. We have decided not to include the two most present and abundant taxa, Acari and Collembola, in this paper in consideration of the vast amount of existing literature and focus the discussion on the other microarthropod groups. We reported some studies for each taxon highlighting the use of the group as soil quality indicator. A brief section reporting some indices based on soil microarthropods is proposed at the end of this specific discussion. This paper can be considered as a reference point in the use of soil arthropods to estimate soil quality and health.

10abioindicators10amacroarthropods10amesofauna10amicroarthropods10asoil biodiversity10asoil degradation10asoil quality1 aMenta, Cristina1 aRemelli, Sara uhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/11/1/5401247nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245007500055210006900130260001500199300001200214490000700226520049000233653001200723653002500735653002200760653002100782653002400803653002200827653002100849653002500870100002700895856008300922 2021 eng d a0132-806900aSome centipedes and millipedes (Myriapoda) new to the fauna of Belarus0 aSome centipedes and millipedes Myriapoda new to the fauna of Bel c25/03/2021 a106-1080 v303 a

Abstract: The first records of three species of centipedes and one species of millipede from Belarus are provided. All records are clearly synathropic.

РЕЗЮМЕ. Приведены сведения о фаунистических находках трёх новых видов губоногих и одного вида двупарноногих многоножек в Беларуси. Все находки явно синантропные.

10aBelarus10aBlaniulus guttulatus10afaunistic records10aGeophilus flavus10aLithobius crassipes10aLithobius microps10aБеларусь10aфаунистика1 aOstrovsky, Artsiom, M. uhttps://kmkjournals.com/journals/REJ/REJ_Index_Volumes/REJ_30/REJ_30_1_106_10801601nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001500214300001200229490000700241520090700248653001501155653001201170653001501182653001701197653001501214100002701229700002101256700002401277856007001301 2020 eng d a0022-432400aA taxonomic key for nine first record species of Chilopoda-Arthropoda in Central Iraq0 ataxonomic key for nine first record species of ChilopodaArthropo c15/05/2020 a608-6140 v513 a

This study aimed to classified some species of Chilopoda which is the first record in Iraq. The samples collected from April 2018 to March 2019, in some areas of central of Iraq, which are: Baghdad, Anbar, Babylon, Diyala and Qadisiyah. We found nine species from 183 numbers of samples. The species we recorded for a first time in Iraq are: Scolopendra amazonica, S. afer, Cormocephalus nigrificatus, Cryptops anomalans, Geophilus flavus, Haplophilus souletinus, Lithobius microps, Lamyctes emarginatus and Scutigera coleoptrata. The species were supported by photos, then the samples where stored in Iraq Natural History Research center and Museum.

Remark: Keywords are wrong and were not added. The printed keywords belong to the subsequent article (by the same authors) in the issue.

10aChoneiulus10aJulidae10amillipedes10aPolydesmidae10aPolydesmus1 aAl-Doori, Maysaloon, L1 aAzooz, Hayder, W1 aAl-Door, Nibrass, L uhttps://www.lepidopteraresearchfoundation.org/abstract.php?id=21002538nas a2200133 4500008004100000245010100041210006900142260007000211300000900281520201900290100002002309700002002329856005502349 2020 eng d00aProjet d'atlas des chilopodes (Chilopoda) des Pays de la Loire: Bilan des 5ème et 6ème années0 aProjet datlas des chilopodes Chilopoda des Pays de la Loire Bila aRennesbGroupe d'Étude des Invertébrés Armoricainsc05/12/2020 a1-213 a

Avec 2725 données nouvelles acquises entre mai 2018 et novembre 2020, la dynamique d'atlas régional des chilopodes des Pays de la Loire amorcée début 2014 se poursuit. L'ensemble totalise 9432 données et 24221 chilopodes identifiés dans cette région, pour 43 espèces inventoriées. Plus de trois quarts des 404 mailles régionales de 10x10km sont aujourd'hui pourvues de données de chilopodes et plus de la moitié de ces mailles présentent plus de 5 espèces recensées. Comme découverte remarquable, on peut souligner l'observation de Schendyla monodi (Brölemann, 1924) en Pays de la Loire, une espèce endémique de France écologiquement très spécialisée, puisqu'il s'agit d'une halophile inféodée au schorre. D'autres observations intéressantes ont été faites, comme par exemple celle de Lithobius aeruginosus L. Koch, 1862, extrêmement rare en Pays de la Loire, dans une 2ème station à 20km de la 1ère. Cette espèce propre aux forêts humides et fraîches de feuillus est déterminante pour les ZNIEFF des Pays de la Loire et de Bretagne. La dynamique régionale affiche donc une belle progression en 6 ans, avec un nombre de données quasiment multiplié par 20 ! Cette dynamique ligérienne s'associe plus globalement à une dynamique française en plein essor. En 2020, les chilopodes septentrionaux de France se révèlent être devenus relativement aisés à prendre en compte dans les dynamiques d'acquisition de connaissances et de mise en évidence d'arthropodes à enjeux de conservation pour des habitats particuliers (e.g. plages et milieux connexes ; sol et litière des forêts caducifoliées).

1 aIorio, Étienne1 aRacine, Antoine uhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/34664768402425nas a2200217 4500008004100000022001400041245013300055210006900188260001500257300001000272490000700282520170600289653001601995653001102011653001402022653002102036653000902057100002002066700002202086856009902108 2020 eng d a0240-875900aInfluence of small- and large-scale ecological factors on the centipede (Chilopoda) assemblages of Armorican forests (NW France)0 aInfluence of small and largescale ecological factors on the cent c09/11/2020 a79-870 v703 a

Abstract: Despite their high functional role as abundant predators, the drivers of centipede assemblages remain poorly known in forests, especially in France. Using replicated depletion quadrats, we sampled five forests distributed over the Armorican Massif. A total of 5209 individuals belonging to 20 species was collected between 2015 and 2017. Assemblage composition was surprisingly constant across parcels, with only different dominant species in the oldest parcel (Bercé, Pays-de-Loire) and in the forest of Cerisy (Normandy). The latter hosted two exclusive species, likely because of both biogeographic and abiotic conditions, Geophilus truncorum and Lithobius aeruginosus. Species richness was overall close among sites and parcels, and therefore little influenced by tree age or dominant species. Individual densities varied between site pair-matched parcels, probably because of differences in temporal forest continuity rather than differences in tree ages. In quadrats, the presence of numerous ants strongly affected the number of centipedes, with global densities divided by an average factor of 7. Also at small spatial scale, we did not find a strong vertical stratification of centipede species in terms of presence-absence, with only 2 species exclusive of soil and none for litter, but with important differences in the relative abundance of dominant species. This study suggests that centipedes are important components of the forest soil and litter fauna, should be more frequently studied in French forests and have a potential of bio-indicators of local conditions in these habitats, as well as of temporal forest continuity.

10acompetition10alitter10aMyriapoda10aquadrat sampling10asoil1 aIorio, Étienne1 aPétillon, Julien uhttps://wwwphp.obs-banyuls.fr/Viemilieu/index.php/volume-70-2020/70-issue-1/701-article-8.html05224nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245020300055210006900258260001500327300001000342490000800352520424000360653001904600653002304619653001604642653001504658653001004673100002004683700002004703700002204723856024904745 2020 eng d a0037-928X00aDistribution and indicator value of intertidal centipedes from Mediterranean beaches within and around Port-Cros National Park (Southern France), with proposal of a simplified monitoring (Chilopoda)0 aDistribution and indicator value of intertidal centipedes from M c20/03/2020 a41-620 v1253 a

Abstract: A study on centipedes living on beaches within and around Port-Cros National Park was conducted during the spring of 2019, using hand-collection along transects. One hundred and twenty chilopods (108 of them being Geophilomorpha) were collected, including the halophilous species Henia bicarinata (Dignathodontidae), Geophilus fucorum and Tuoba poseidonis (Geophilidae). The halophilic character of H. bicarinata and G. fucorum was confirmed on the seashore of continental France while T. poseidonis was considered strictly halophilic. Pachymerium ferrugineum (Geophilidae) was considered only halotolerant, in the way it is not restricted to the coastline area. The dominant sediments were observed to have a moderate influence on the presence of halophilous and halobiontic geophilomorphs, with gravel sediments having a more favourable effect. In addition, microhabitats provided by pebbles are of significant importance for halophilic species while the presence of stranded Posidonia seems useful for these species. The availability of driftwood is favourable only when it gives a limited contact with the substrate or the stranded Posidonia layer. Lastly, the impact of human frequentation was very significant regarding halophilic species; all these species were found to be absent where human activity was high. The presence or absence of halophilic centipedes well shows the conservation state of the shore for species living in this habitat. An experimental easy monitoring with identification sheets is given to determine the conservation state of beaches in South-Eastern France.

Répartition et valeur indicatrice des Chilopodes intertidaux des plages méditerranéennes dans et autour du Parc national de Port-Cros (sud de la France), avec proposition d’une méthode d’évaluation simplifiée (Chilopoda)

Résumé: Une étude sur les Chilopodes des plages dans et autour du Parc national de Port-Cros a été réalisée au printemps 2019, à l’aide de récoltes manuelles dans des transects. Cent-vingt chilopodes (108 de ceux-ci étant des Geophilomorpha) ont été collectés, incluant les espèces halophiles Henia bicarinata (Dignathodontidae), Geophilus fucorum et Tuoba poseidonis (Geophilidae). Le caractère halophile d’H. bicarinata et de G. fucorum est confirmé sur le littoral français, tandis que T. poseidonis est considéré comme strictement halophile (= halobie). Pachymerium ferrugineum (Geophilidae) est seulement considéré comme halotolérant, dans le sens où il n’est pas restreint aux milieux salés littoraux en France. Les sédiments dominants ont une influence modérée sur la présence des halophiles et halobiontes, avec les sédiments graveleux ayant un effet plus favorable. En complément, les micro-habitats fournis par les galets sont d’importance significative pour eux ; quant aux posidonies échouées, elles semblent utiles. La disponibilité de bois échoués est considérée comme favorable uniquement quand ils sont en contact étroit avec le substrat ou la couche de posidonies échouées. Enfin, l’impact de la fréquentation humaine est très significatif sur les espèces halophiles : toutes ces espèces sont absentes quand la fréquentation humaine est élevée. La présence ou absence des chilopodes halophiles est un bon indicateur de l’état de conservation des plages pour les espèces d’Arthropodes inféodées à cet habitat. Un suivi expérimental simplifié avec des fiches d’identification est donné pour déterminer l’état de conservation des plages dans le sudest de la France.

10aGeophilomorpha10ahalophilic species10aHyères Var10aMonitoring10awrack1 aIorio, Étienne1 aGeoffroy, David1 aPétillon, Julien uhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/340067094_Distribution_and_indicator_value_of_intertidal_centipedes_from_Mediterranean_beaches_within_and_around_Port-Cros_National_Park_Southern_France_with_proposal_of_a_simplified_monitoring_Chilopoda01282nas a2200145 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214300001000226520079400236100002701030700002001057856005901077 2020 eng d a0242-177100aMyriapodes chilopodes et diplopodes des souterrains de Paris et de sa proche banlieue0 aMyriapodes chilopodes et diplopodes des souterrains de Paris et  c03/2020 a39-473 a

Une campagne d’échantillonnage des invertébrés a été menée dans les réseaux souterrains de la ville de Paris et de la banlieue proche. Le présent travail présente les résultats obtenus concernant les myriapodes (chilopodes et diplopodes) issus de ces récoltes. Six espèces de chilopodes (Classe Chilopoda) et neuf espèces de diplopodes (Classe Diplopoda) ont pu être identifiées. Parmi ces dernières, certaines espèces sont nouvelles pour les départements des Yvelines, des Hauts-de-Seine et de la Seine-Saint-Denis. Ces résultats contribuent à l'enrichissement des inventaires et atlas des myriapodes de France (project INAMYFRA).

1 aGeoffroy, Jean-Jacques1 aFerrand, Marina uhttps://publications.ffspeleo.fr/bulletin.php?id=2599900710nas a2200097 4500008004100000245007300041210006900114520032800183100002000511856008100531 2020 eng d00aNewsletter of the British Myriapod and Isopod Group, 41, Autumn 20200 aNewsletter of the British Myriapod and Isopod Group 41 Autumn 203 a

The newsletter includes items on: Centipede atlas update. The Darwin Tree of Life project. Luminous centipedes. Some rainforest goodies. Paul Richards giving an introduction to millipedes. Hebridean fossil millipedes in the Times.

Published: 15.11.2020 (website upload date, communicated by Steve Gregory).

1 aRead, Helen, J. uhttps://www.bmig.org.uk/sites/www.bmig.org.uk/files/news/BMIGnews41-2020.pdf00667nas a2200097 4500008004100000245007300041210006900114520028500183100002000468856008100488 2020 eng d00aNewsletter of the British Myriapod and Isopod Group, 40, Spring 20200 aNewsletter of the British Myriapod and Isopod Group 40 Spring 203 a

The newsletter includes items on: Ophyiulus germanicus, with Laboulbeniales fungus. Melogona voigtii confirmed new to England. Luminous centipedes. First record of a pocket centipede? Leptoiulus belgicus down sauf.

Published: 11.03.2020

1 aRead, Helen, J. uhttps://www.bmig.org.uk/sites/www.bmig.org.uk/files/news/BMIGnews40-2020.pdf00557nas a2200109 4500008004100000245017000041210006900211300001300280490000800293100001800301856012800319 1971 eng d00aLicht- und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen zur Neurosekretion bei Geophilus longicornis Leach unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Neurohämalorgane0 aLicht und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen zur Neurosekre a62–1300 v1821 aErnst, Alfred uhttps://myriatrix.myspecies.info/content/licht-und-elektronenmikroskopische-untersuchungen-zur-neurosekretion-bei-geophilus01482nas a2200217 4500008004100000022001400041245010500055210006900160260001500229300001200244490000900256520080500265653001901070653002001089653001301109653001701122100002001139700002101159700001801180856006601198 2013 eng d a1175-532600aMorphology of a neglected large-sized species of Geophilus from Iran (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)0 aMorphology of a neglected largesized species of iGeophilusi from c11/10/2013 a486-5000 v37363 a

Geophilus gigas was described briefly by Attems in 1951 from two sites in Iran, but neither reported nor cited subsequently. The original description is inadequate to understand the full morphology and the taxonomic position of the species. Thus it is here redescribed and figured in detail based on the examination of a syntype and newly collected specimens. Furthermore it is compared with the most similar species of the genus Geophilus. G.  gigas can be reliably distinguished from other related species for the maximum body size (more than 6 cm), the arrangement and extent of the sternal pore-fields (with additional groups of pores), the coxal pores number and distribution (tens, scattered), and the size of the ulti-mate legs (swollen in both sexes).

10aGeophilomorpha10aGeophilus gigas10aTaxonomy10aWestern Asia1 aZarei, Roghaieh1 aRahimian, Hassan1 aBonato, Lucio uhttps://www.biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3736.5.400391nas a2200109 4500008004100000245007200041210006900113300001200182490000700194100002700201856005300228 1858 eng d00aDiagnoses de quelques Myriapodes nouveaux de l'ordre des Chilopodes0 aDiagnoses de quelques Myriapodes nouveaux de lordre des Chilopod a545-5470 v101 ade Saussure, Henri, LF uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/231689600359nas a2200121 4500008004100000245004300041210004300084260001500127300001000142490000700152100002500159856005300184 1958 eng d00aSome records of chilopods from Florida0 aSome records of chilopods from Florida c18/01/1958 a13-140 v691 aChamberlin, Ralph, V uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/273948200670nas a2200133 4500008004100000245006300041210006200104260001200166300001000178490000600188520027500194100001600469856005100485 1837 eng d00aÉtudes pour servir à l'histoire naturelle des Myriapodes0 aÉtudes pour servir à lhistoire naturelle des Myriapodes c01/1837 a35-600 v73 a

Recommended citation: Gervais, P. (1837): Études pour servir à l’histoire naturelle des Myriapodes. Annales des sciences naturelles, série 2, Zoologie, 7: 35-60. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/28836

1 aGervais, P. uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/2883602096nas a2200253 4500008004100000022001400041245017400055210006900229260001500298300001000313490000800323520127700331653001201608653001701620653000801637653002201645100002001667700002401687700001801711700002301729700001801752700002001770856005201790 2015 eng d a1313-298900aFirst results of the German Barcode of Life (GBOL) – Myriapoda project: Cryptic lineages in German Stenotaenia linearis (Koch, 1835) (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha)0 aFirst results of the German Barcode of Life GBOL Myriapoda proje c30/06/2015 a15-290 v5103 a

As part of the German Barcode of Life (GBOL) Myriapoda program, which aims to sequence the COI barcoding fragment for 2000 specimens of Germany’s 200 myriapod species in the near future, 44 sequences of the centipede order Geophilomorpha are analyzed. The analyses are limited to the genera Geophilus Leach, 1814 and Stenotaenia Koch, 1847 and include a total of six species. A special focus is Stenotaenia, of which 19 specimens from southern, western and eastern Germany could be successfully sequenced. The Stenotaenia data shows the presence of three to four vastly different (13.7–16.7% p-distance) lineages of the genus in Germany. At least two of the three lineages show a wide distribution across Germany, only the lineage including topotypes of S. linearis shows a more restricted distribution in southern Germany. In a maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis the Italian species S. ‘sorrentina’ (Attems, 1903) groups with the different German S. linearis clades. The strongly different Stenotaenia linearis lineages within Germany, independent of geography, are a strong hint for the presence of additional, cryptic Stenotaenia species in Germany.

10abarcode10abiodiversity10aCOI10acryptic diversity1 aWesener, Thomas1 aVoigtländer, Karin1 aDecker, Peter1 aOeyen, Jan, Philip1 aSpelda, Jörg1 aLindner, Norman uhttp://zookeys.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=551400339nas a2200109 4500008004100000245004300041210004300084300001200127490000700139100002900146856005400175 1878 eng d00aJapanesische Arachniden und Myriapoden0 aJapanesische Arachniden und Myriapoden a735-7980 v271 aKoch, Ludwig, Carl Chris uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/4288226900349nas a2200109 4500008004100000245004900041210004900090300001400139490000600153100001800159856006200177 1872 eng d00aDescriptions of new North American Myriopods0 aDescriptions of new North American Myriopods a117–1210 v41 aHarger, Oscar uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/114152\#page/12501112nas a2200253 4500008004100000022001400041245007600055210006900131260001500200300001000215490000700225520036800232653001400600653001500614653001600629100001800645700002700663700002300690700002400713700002200737700002500759700002200784856005200806 2010 eng d a1313-298900aA common terminology for the external anatomy of centipedes (Chilopoda)0 acommon terminology for the external anatomy of centipedes Chilop c18/11/2010 a17-510 v693 a

A common terminology for the external morphological characters of centipedes (Chilopoda) is proposed. Terms are selected from the alternatives used in the English literature, preferring those most frequently used or those that have been introduced explicitly. A total of 330 terms are defined and illustrated, and another ca. 500 alternatives are listed.

10aChilopoda10amorphology10aterminology1 aBonato, Lucio1 aEdgecombe, Gregory, D.1 aLewis, John, G. E.1 aMinelli, Alessandro1 aPereira, Luis, A.1 aShelley, Rowland, M.1 aZapparoli, Marzio uhttp://zookeys.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=246604196nas a2200253 4500008004100000245011700041210007300158260007100231300000700302490001300309520340800322653001403730653001603744653001803760653001003778653000903788653001103797653001003808653001403818653001403832653001403846100002203860856006003882 2020 eng d00aKterý způsob managementu polomu vyhovuje stonožkám? - Which windthrow management is suitable for centipedes?0 aKterý způsob managementu polomu vyhovuje stonožkám Which windthr aOlomoucbUP v Olomouci - Palacky University of Olomoucc28/01/2020 a350 vbachelor3 a

Větrné disturbance hrají významnou roli ve vývojovém cyklu horského smrkového lesa. Plošné odstranění zapojeného korunového patra otevírá prostor pro nová společenstva a společně s lýkožroutem smrkovým je podle posledních studií klíčovým prvkem obnovy horské smrčiny. Větrné disturbance však ovlivňují i hospodářské smrkové lesy, kde je většinou tendence padlé dřevo zpracovat pro ekonomický zisk a jako prevenci vůči požárům a kůrovcové kalamitě. Takový zásah vichřice má přirozený dopad i na půdní faunu. Tato práce se zabývá dopadem vichřice na společenstva stonožek ve Vysokých a Západních Tatrách a snaží se zodpovědět otázku, jaký následný management polomu ve smrkovém lese stonožkám více vyhovuje. Pro odběry byly stanoveny referenční plochy a plochy s odlišným managementem polomu, které byli primárně sledovány mezi roky 2007 až 2009. Pro odběr materiálu byly použity půdní vzorky, pro sledování epigeické aktivity stonožek byly na lokalitách umístěny padací zemní pasti. Celkově bylo determinováno 2535 jedinců, zaznamenáno bylo 14 druhů. Ze získaných dat lze usoudit, že bezzásahový management měl 5 let po vichřici pozitivnější vliv na abundance stonožek oproti asanačnímu managementu na sledovaných plochách.

Vaverka M. (2020): Which windthrow management is suitable for centipedes? [bachelor’s thesis]. Olomouc: Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Palacky University of Olomouc. 35 pp. 2 Appendices. In Czech.

English Abstract:
Wind disturbances play an important role in the development cycle of mountain spruce forest.
Complete removal of the tree canopy open space for new communities and together with spruce bark beetle, according to the current studies, are a key element in development cycle of mountain spruce forest. However, windstorms also affect economic spruce forests, where is usually a tendency to remove fallen timber for economic gain and for the prevention of fire and bark beetle calamity. Naturally, windthrow has an important impact on the soil fauna. This work deals with impact of windstorm on centipede communities in High and West Tatra Mts. with an interest to explain, which windthrow management in spruce forest is more suitable for centipedes. Reference areas and areas with different management were established for the sampling primarily in the years 2007 to 2009. Heat extraction of soil samples was used for evaluation of abundances and pitfall traps for evaluation of epigeic activity of centipedes. Totally, 2535 individuals of 14 species were identified. The collected data can be partially concluded that non-intervention management had positive influence on the abundance of centipedes 5 years after the windstorm, compared with timber-removed stands.

10aChilopoda10adisturbance10aNorway spruce10apolom10asmrk10aTatras10aTatry10avichřice10awindstorm10awindthrow1 aVaverka, Miroslav uhttp://myriapoda.upol.cz/tuf/pdf/papers/Vaverka2020.pdf00403nas a2200121 4500008004100000245003300041210003300074260007300107300001200180490000600192100002900198856005400227 1887 eng d00aNew North American myriapods0 aNew North American myriapods b[Lawrence, Kan., etc.]New York Entomological Society [etc.]c08/1887 a81–830 v31 aBollman, Charles, Harvey uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/1140597100536nas a2200133 4500008004100000245006900041210006900110260006600179300001400245490000700259520005600266100002900322856005100351 1888 eng d00aDescriptions of fourteen new species of North American myriapods0 aDescriptions of fourteen new species of North American myriapods bWashington :Smithsonian Institution Press, [etc.]c19/09/1888 a617–6270 v103 a

Remark: Published in signatures 39 and 40.

1 aBollman, Charles, Harvey uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/2375801247nas a2200277 4500008004100000022001400041245012100055210006900176260001500245300001400260490000900274520040300283653001200686653001500698653001400713653001400727653001600741653001100757653001300768100002900781700002200810700002100832700002400853700002600877856006600903 2019 eng d a1175-532600aGeophilus serbicus sp. nov., a new species from the Balkan Peninsula (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Geophilidae)0 aiGeophilus serbicusi sp nov a new species from the Balkan Penins c23/08/2019 a556 - 5700 v46583 a

Geophilus serbicus sp. nov., a new epigeic centipede species, is described and illustrated based on specimens collected from the Stara Planina Mountains (the Balkan Mountain Range), Eastern Serbia, Balkan Peninsula. Considerations on the taxonomic relationships with some similar Geophilus species are briefly presented, and the distribution of the new species is mapped.

10aBalkans10acentipedes10aGeophilus10aMyriapoda10anew species10aSerbia10aTaxonomy1 aStojanović, Dalibor, Z.1 aMitić, Bojan, M.1 aGedged, Amna, M.1 aAntić, Dragan, Ž.1 aMakarov, Slobodan, E. uhttps://www.biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.4658.3.701877nas a2200265 4500008004100000022001400041245013200055210006900187260001500256300001100271520097900282653002501261653002601286653001801312653003001330653001101360100002901371700002201400700002201422700002101444700002501465700002401490700002601514856007101540 2020 eng d a0792-425900aEarly development of the centipede Geophilus serbicus (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Geophilidae) from the Balkan Peninsula0 aEarly development of the centipede iGeophilus serbicusi Chilopod c10/02/2020 a1 - 113 a

The first detailed description of early development of the recently described European geophilid Geophilus serbicus is presented. Based on specimens from a natural population from the Balkan Peninsula, new insight was gained into the reproductive and developmental biology of the group. Changes in the morphology of brooded specimens allow 15 early developmental stages obligatorily dependent on prolonged maternal care, arranged in three phases (embryonic, embryoid, and adolescent) to be distinguished. The embryonic phase includes eight stages, followed by an intermediate stage of hatching, followed in turn by five embryoid stages and one adolescens stage. Detailed morphological descriptions of all stages are provided. Adolescens I is recognized as the first stage at which species and sex identification are possible. Besides the description of the earliest stages, we provide notes on reproductive behaviour and ecological features of the species.

10aembryoid development10aEmbryonic development10aparental care10apostembryonic development10aSerbia1 aStojanović, Dalibor, Z.1 aMitić, Bojan, M.1 aDudić, Boris, D.1 aGedged, Amna, M.1 aTomić, Vladimir, T.1 aAntić, Dragan, Ž.1 aMakarov, Slobodan, E. uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07924259.2020.172651401070nas a2200133 4500008004100000245024900041210006900290260001500359300001200374490000700386520046500393100002700858856005100885 1816 eng d00aA tabular View of the external Characters of Four Classes of Animals, which Linné arranged under Insecta; with the Distribution of the Genera composing Three of these Classes into Orders, &c. and Descriptions of several New Genera and Species0 atabular View of the external Characters of Four Classes of Anima c24/01/1816 a306-4000 v113 a

Recommended citation: Leach, W. E. (1816) [1815]: A tabular View of the external Characters of Four Classes of Animals, which Linné arranged under Insecta; with the Distribution of the Genera composing Three of these Classes  into Orders, &c. and Descriptions of several New Genera and Species. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 11 (2): 306-400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1813.tb00065.x

1 aLeach, William, Elford uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/1971600930nas a2200193 4500008004100000022002500041245009500066210006900161260001500230300001000245490000700255520033200262653001400594653001200608653002600620100001900646700002400665856004700689 2018 eng d a0373-6873, 1796-981600aRediscovery of Geophilus carpophagus Leach (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha) from Finland0 aRediscovery of iGeophilus carpophagusi Leach Chilopoda Geophilom c08/05/2018 a36-380 v943 a

Geophilus carpophagus Leach, 1815 has long been listed as regionally extinct from Finland. Here we report its rediscovery after decades of absence.

Publication date remark: The journal website states "2018-05-08". The first page of the article reads "4 June 2018".

10aChilopoda10aFinland10aGeophilus carpophagus1 aVahtera, Varpu1 aLehtinen, Pekka, T. uhttps://journal.fi/msff/article/view/70973