@article {1995, title = {A new schendylid from the eastern United States, with notes on distribution and morphology (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Schendylidae)}, journal = {Entomological News}, volume = {69}, year = {1958}, month = {02/07/1958}, pages = {153-160}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Crabill, R. E. (1958): A new schendylid from the eastern United States, with notes on distribution and morphology (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Schendylidae). Entomological News, 69 (6): 153-160. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/10395

}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/10395}, author = {Crabill, Ralph E.} } @article {1965, title = {On the centipedes of Yemen}, journal = {Zoology in the Middle East}, volume = {4}, year = {1990}, pages = {61-70}, abstract = {

Summary: Six species of Scolopendromorpha and two of Geophilomorpha are recorded from Yemen. All are well known species. The collection contained no Lithobiomorpha or Scutigeromorpha.

Kurzfassung: 6 Arten von Scolopendromorpha und zwei Arten von Geophilomorpha wurden im Yemen nachgewiesen. Alle Arten sind bekannt. Die Aufsammlung enthielt keine Lithobiomorpha und Scutigeromorpha.

Recommended citation: Lewis, J. G. E. and Wranik, W. (1990): On the centipedes of Yemen. Zoology in the Middle East, 4 (1): 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09397140.1990.10637589

}, keywords = {centipedes, South Arabia, Yemen, zoogeography}, issn = {0939-7140, 2326-2680}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1080/09397140.1990.10637589}, url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09397140.1990.10637589}, author = {Lewis, John G. E. and Wranik, Wolfgang} } @article {1811, title = {On some new genera of the class Myriapoda}, journal = {Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London}, volume = {10}, year = {1843}, month = {02/1843}, pages = {177-181}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Newport, G. (1843) [1842]: On some new genera of the class Myriapoda. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 10 (119): 177-181. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/244439

Bibliographic remarks: This work has an exact duplicate. Newport, George (1843): On some new Genera of the Class Myriapoda. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, including Zoology, Botany and Geology, ser. 1, 11 (73): 498-502. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/18642403 [01/06/1843]

Publication date remarks: The article was read on December 13, 1842. Part X bears the date 1842. Number CXIX was printed in February 1843.

}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/244439}, author = {Newport, George} } @article {1809, title = {On some new Genera of the Class Myriapoda [reprint]}, journal = {The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, including Zoology, Botany and Geology, ser. 1}, volume = {11}, year = {1843}, month = {01/06/1843}, pages = {498-502}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Newport, G. (1843): On some new Genera of the Class Myriapoda. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, including Zoology, Botany and Geology, ser. 1, 11 (73): 498-502. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/18642403

Bibliographic remark: Reprinted from the Proceedings of the Zoological Society for Dec. 13, 1842.

Publication date remarks: The printed date is July 1843. The publication date is 01/06/1843.

}, issn = {0374-5481}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/18642403}, author = {Newport, George} } @inbook {1798, title = {Tuhatjalkaiset - Myriapods - Myriapoda}, booktitle = {Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus {\textendash} Punainen kirja 2019}, year = {2019}, pages = {340-343}, publisher = {Ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}ministeri{\"o} \& Suomen ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}keskus}, organization = {Ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}ministeri{\"o} \& Suomen ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}keskus}, address = {Helsinki}, abstract = {

Viittausohje, kun viitataan yksitt\äiseen Punaisen listan lukuun: Vahtera, V. 2019. Tuhatjalkaiset. Julk.: Hyv\ärinen, E., Jusl\én, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddstr\öm, A. \& Liukko, U.-M. (toim.) 2019. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus \– Punainen kirja 2019. Ymp\ärist\öministeri\ö \& Suomen ymp\ärist\ökeskus. Helsinki. S. 340-343. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Reference of a separate chapter of the Red List: Vahtera, V. 2019. Myriapods. In: Hyv\ärinen, E., Jusl\én, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddstr\öm, A. \& Liukko, U.-M. (eds.) 2019. The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species. Ministry of the Environment \& Finnish Environment Institute. Helsinki. P. 340-343. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Summary: Myriapoda are a diverse group of terrestrial arthropods, some of which are herbivores, some predators and some decomposers. There are four classes of Myriapoda: centipedes (Chilopoda), millipedes (Diplopoda), pauropods (Pauropoda), and symphylans (Symphyla). In Finland, a total of 63 species have been found: 21 centipede, 28 millipede, eight pauropod, and six symphylan species. In total, there are ten red-listed species: the critically endangered (CR) Geophilus carpophagus, which was classified as Regionally Extinct (RE) in the two previous assessments, and the Near Threatened (NT) species G. electricus, G. truncorum and Julus scanicus. These species only have one known locality each, and no new observations have been made of the three Near Threatened (NT) species for a long time. Six species have been categorised as Data Deficient (DD). Many species were classified as Not Evaluated (NE) due to insufficient information on their occurrence. While no monitoring of Myriapoda has been organised in Finland, the information on the spread of the species in this country could be updated by organising a monitoring study of a few years in duration.

}, issn = {978-952-11-4973-3, ISBN 978-952-11-4974-0}, url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501}, author = {Vahtera, Varpu} } @book {1797, title = {Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus {\textendash} Punainen kirja 2019}, year = {2019}, pages = {704}, publisher = {Ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}ministeri{\"o} \& Suomen ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}keskus}, organization = {Ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}ministeri{\"o} \& Suomen ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}keskus}, address = {Helsinki}, abstract = {

Tiivistelm\ä: Julkaisussa esitell\ä\än Suomen lajien viides uhanalaisuusarviointi. Suomen lajim\ä\är\än arvioidaan nyky\ä\än olevan v\ähint\ä\än 48 000. Riitt\äv\ät tiedot uhanalaisuusarviointiin oli 22 418 lajista tai alemmasta taksonista, mik\ä on noin 47 \% lajistosta. Uhanalaisiksi arvioitiin 2 668 lajia tai alempaa taksonia eli noin 11,9 \% arvioiduista lajeista. Punaisen listan lajeja, joihin kuuluvat uhanalaisten lis\äksi h\ävinneet, silm\äll\äpidett\äv\ät ja puutteellisesti tunnetut on yhteens\ä 6 683 (29,8 \%). Arvioiduista lajeista \ä\ärimm\äisen uhanalaisia (CR) on 489, eritt\äin uhanalaisia (EN) 918, vaarantuneita (VU) 1 260, silm\äll\äpidett\ävi\ä (NT) 1 912, puutteellisesti tunnettuja (DD) 1 792, h\ävinneit\ä (RE) 312 ja elinvoimaisia (LC) 15 735. Arviointi tehtiin Kansainv\älisen luonnonsuojeluliiton (IUCN) ohjeiden ja kriteerien mukaan. IUCN:n alueellisen uhanalaisuusarvioinnin kriteerit perustuvat lajien havaittuun, arvioituun, p\ä\äteltyyn tai ennustettuun populaatioiden pienenemiseen, levinneisyys- tai esiintymisalueen kokoon, pieneen ja jatkuvasti taantuvaan tai hyvin pieneen populaatioon tai kvantitatiiviseen analyysiin. Lis\äksi Suomessa on dokumentoitu lajien elinymp\ärist\öt sek\ä uhanalaisuuden syyt ja uhkatekij\ät. Enemmist\ö uhanalaisista lajeista el\ä\ä metsiss\ä (31 \%) sek\ä perinneymp\ärist\öiss\ä ja muissa ihmisen muuttamissa ymp\ärist\öiss\ä (24 \%). Uhanalaisten osuus kunkin elinymp\ärist\ön arvioiduista lajeista on korkein tunturipaljakalla (37,9 \%). Uhanalaisten lajien m\ä\är\ä on suurin hemiboreaalisella ja etel\äboreaalisella vy\öhykkeell\ä Etel\ä-Suomessa. Julkaisussa vertaillaan arvioinnin tuloksia vuoden 2010 tuloksiin esimerkiksi uhanalaisuusindeksin avulla. Lis\äksi julkaisussa tarkastellaan vuoden 2010 uhanalaisuusarvioinnin ohjausryhm\än ehdotusten toteutumista. Arvioinnin tulosten pohjalta Eli\ölajien uhanalaisuuden arvioinnin ohjausryhm\ä (LAUHA) esitt\ä\ä 13 toimenpide-ehdotusta uhanalaisten lajien suojelun, hoidon, tutkimuksen ja seurannan j\ärjest\ämiseksi ja rahoittamiseksi. Arvioinnit on tehty eli\öryhm\äkohtaisissa ty\öryhmiss\ä ja ty\ön tulokset esitell\ä\än eli\öryhmitt\äin 39 luvussa.

Viittausohje, kun viitataan koko julkaisuun: Hyv\ärinen, E., Jusl\én, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddstr\öm, A. \& Liukko, U.-M. (toim.) 2019. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus \– Punainen kirja 2019. Ymp\ärist\öministeri\ö \& Suomen ymp\ärist\ökeskus. Helsinki. 704 s. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Sammandrag: I denna bok presenteras resultat av Finlands femte hotbed\ömning. Finlands artantal uppskattas f\ör tillf\ället till minst 48 000. Tillr\äckliga uppgifter f\ör hotbed\ömning fanns om 22 418 arter eller l\ägre taxa, vilket utg\ör 47 \% av alla arter. Av dessa bed\ömdes 2 667 arter eller l\ägre taxa vara hotade, d.v.s. 11,9 \%. R\ödlistade arter, som f\örutom hotade arter \även innefattar f\örsvunna arter, n\ära hotade arter och arter som det r\åder kunskapsbrist om, uppg\år till 6 683 (29,8 \%). Av de bed\ömda arterna \är 498 akut hotade (CR), 918 starkt hotade (EN), 1 260 s\årbara (VU), 1 912 n\ära hotade (NT), 1 792 med kunskapsbrist (DD), 312 f\örsvunna (RE) och 15 735 livskraftiga. Hoten har bed\ömts p\å basis av Internationella Naturv\årdsunionens (IUCN) regionala hotbed\ömningskriterier. Kriterierna grundar sig p\å observerad, deduktiv eller estimerad minskning av populationer eller utbrednings- och f\örekomstomr\åden, en liten och kontinuerligt minskande eller en mycket liten population eller p\å kvantitativ analys. D\ärut\över har arternas livsmilj\ö, hotorsak och hotfaktorer i Finland dokumenterats. Majoriteten av de hotade arterna lever i skogar (31 \%), v\årdbiotoper och andra kulturmilj\öer (24 \%). Antalet hotade arter \är h\ögst inom den hemiboreala och sydboreala zonen i s\ödra Finland. Andelen hotade arter i en specifik habitattyp \är h\ögst i kalfj\ället(37,9 \%). I publikationen j\ämf\örs resultaten av hotbed\ömningen med resultaten fr\ån \år 2010 t.ex. med hj\älp av r\ödlisteindexet. Vid sidan av bed\ömningsresultaten beskrivs de mest p\åtagliga administrativa och juridiska \åtg\ärder som vidtagits f\ör artskydd samt forskning och \övervakning sedan den f\öreg\ående bed\ömningen. Hotbed\ömningens styrgrupp (LAUHA ) f\öresl\år 13 \åtg\ärder f\ör organisering och finansiering av skydd, v\ård, forskning och \övervakning av hotade arter. Resultaten av bed\ömningen som \är genomf\örd av expertgrupper presenteras i 39 kapitel som omfattar olika organismgrupper.

The Red List of Finnish Species 2019

Abstract: This publication describes the fifth assessment of Finnish threatened species. The current estimated number of species in Finland is at least 48,000. Sufficient information was available for the evaluation of 22,418 species or lower taxa, which is approximately 47\% of all species. In total, 2,667 species or lower taxa (11.9\%) were assessed as threatened. The red-listed species, which, in addition to threatened species, include the species classified as Regionally Extinct, Near Threatened, and Data Deficient, total 6,683 (29.8\%). Of the species evaluated, 489 were classified as Critically Endangered (CR), 918 as Endangered (EN), 1,260 as Vulnerable (VU), 1,912 as Near Threatened (NT), 1,792 as Data Deficient (DD), 312 as Regionally Extinct (RE), and 15,735 as of Least Concern (LC). The assessment was carried out in accordance with guidelines and criteria issued by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and applied in assessments at the regional level. These criteria are based on observed, estimated, inferred, or projected population size reduction; the extent of occurrence or area of occupancy; continuing decline in a small population or a very small size of population; or a quantitative analysis. In addition, species\’ habitats, as well as causes of threat and threat factors, were documented in the Finnish evaluation. The majority of threatened species live in forests (31\%) and in rural biotopes and other cultural habitats (24\%). Of the species assessed the proportion of threatened species is highest in Alpine habitats (37.9\%). The number of threatened species is highest in the hemiboreal and southern boreal zones in southern Finland. The results of the assessment are compared to the previous assessment 2010 for example with the Red List Index. In addition, proceedings of the proposals given by the steering group of the previous assessment are evaluated. The steering group of this assessment made 13 proposals for measures for the arrangement and financing of the conservation, management, research, and monitoring of threatened species. The results of the work of the expert groups responsible for the evaluation are presented in 39 organism group -specific sections.

Reference of the publication: Hyv\ärinen, E., Jusl\én, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddstr\öm, A. \& Liukko, U.-M. (eds.) 2019. The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species. Ymp\ärist\öministeri\ö \& Suomen ymp\ärist\ökeskus. Helsinki. 704 p. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Publication date: 26/02/2019

}, keywords = {bed{\"o}mning, conservation of species, hotade arter, IUCN, lajiston suojelu, punainen lista, Red list, r{\"o}dlista, skydd av arter, threat assessment, threatened species, uhanalaiset lajit, uhanalaisuusarviointi}, issn = {978-952-11-4973-3, ISBN 978-952-11-4974-0}, url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501}, author = {Hyv{\"a}rinen, Esko and Jusl{\'e}n, Aino and Kemppainen, Eija and Uddstr{\"o}m, Annika and Liukko, Ulla-Maija} } @article {1764, title = {Systematische Aufz{\"a}hlung der Crustaceen, Arachniden und Miriapoden, welche ich bisher in der Umgebung von Trier gefunden habe}, year = {1857}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Schnur, J. (1857): Systematische Aufz\ählung der Crustaceen, Arachniden und Miriapoden, welche ich bisher in der Umgebung von Trier gefunden habe. Jahresbericht der Gesellschaft f\ür n\ützliche Forschungen zu Trier, 5: 53-55. https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.43690.23

}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.43690.23}, url = {https://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/diglit/jahresbericht_trier1856/0057}, author = {Schnur, J.} } @article {1600, title = {The biota of Canada: checklist of the centipedes of Canada (Myriapoda: Chilopoda)}, journal = {The Canadian Entomologist}, volume = {154}, year = {2021}, month = {31/12/2021}, pages = {1-12}, abstract = {

The centipede fauna of Canada is reviewed based on information available in the literature and on examination of some material, and provincial and territorial distributions are provided. About 53 species are known from Canada, representing four orders: Scutigeromorpha (1), Scolopendromorpha (5), Geophilomorpha (19), and Lithobiomorpha (28). British Columbia has the most recorded species (23), followed by Ontario (17) and Newfoundland and Labrador (12). Arctogeophilus glacialis (Attems) and Alaskobius adlatus Chamberlin are newly reported from Canada (Northwest Territories), Schendyla nemorensis (Koch) is newly reported from Ontario, and Lithobius forficatus (Linnaeus) is recorded for the first time from New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island. Arctogeophilus melanonotus (Wood) is removed from the list of Canadian species.

}, issn = {0008-347X, 1918-3240}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4039/tce.2021.58}, url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-entomologist/article/abs/biota-of-canada-checklist-of-the-centipedes-of-canada-myriapoda-chilopoda/EDF1261C878100D1A7AAFC3DA3671C10}, author = {Langor, David W. and Langor, Stephen D.} } @article {1575, title = {Phylogeny of Geophilomorpha (Chilopoda) inferred from new morphological and molecular evidence}, journal = {Cladistics}, volume = {30}, year = {2014}, month = {10/2014}, pages = {485-507}, abstract = {

To address the phylogenetic relationships of the centipede order Geophilomorpha (more than 1000 species), we have reinterpreted and expanded the knowledge on their morphological disparity, and have doubled the amount of molecular data available. We performed maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood analyses, using 195 phylogenetically informative morphological characters for 80 species, and DNA sequences of 28S, 18S, 16S rRNA and COI for up to 48 species. We found strong support for the monophyly of Geophilomorpha, the basal dichotomy between Adesmata and Placodesmata = Mecistocephalidae, and the basal dichotomy within Adesmata between two clades that are recognized here as superfamilies Himantarioidea and Geophiloidea. With respect to the families currently in use, Himantarioidea comprises three well supported clades corresponding to (i) Oryidae, (ii) Himantariidae, and (iii) Schendylidae s.l. including Ballophilidae; Geophiloidea comprises another three supported clades corresponding to (iv) a new family Zelanophilidae, (v) Gonibregmatidae s.l. including Eriphantidae and Neogeophilidae, and (vi) Geophilidae s.l. including Aphilodontidae, Dignathodontidae, Linotaeniidae, and Macronicophilidae.

}, isbn = {0748-3007}, issn = {0748-3007}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12060}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cla.12060}, author = {Bonato, Lucio and Drago, Leandro and Murienne, J{\'e}r{\^o}me} } @article {1520, title = {New taxa of Neotropical Geophilomorpha (Chilopoda)}, journal = {Amazoniana}, volume = {1}, year = {2000}, month = {01/04/2000}, pages = {1-57}, chapter = {1}, abstract = {

A new family (Macronicophilidae) is established for Macronicophilus Silvestri, 1909, currently placed in Geophilidae. Seven new species of Neotropical Geophilomorpha are described: ltyphilus saucius n.sp. and I. sensibilis n.sp. ( Ballophilidae), Hyphydrophilus projectus n.sp. and Ribautia onycophaena n.sp. (Geophilidae), Macronicophilus abbreviatus n.sp., M. unguiseta n.sp. and M. venezolanus n.sp. (Macronicophilidae). The hitherto unknown male of Schendylops marchantariae (Pereira, Minelli \& Barbieri, 1995) is described and two species (Pectiniunguis geayi (Br\ölemann \& Ribaut, 1911) and ltyphilus calinus Chamberlin, 1957 are redescribed from the type and new material. A key to the species of Macronicophilus is provided.

}, keywords = {Amazonia, Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha, Macronicophilidae, Neotropics}, isbn = {0065-6755/2000/001/}, author = {Pereira, Luis Alberto and Foddai, Donatella and Minelli, Alessandro} } @article {1509, title = {Millipedes and centipedes in German greenhouses (Myriapoda: Diplopoda, Chilopoda)}, journal = {Biodiversity Data Journal}, volume = {2}, year = {2014}, month = {11/04/2014}, pages = {1-43}, abstract = {

A review is given of all the literature records of millipedes and centipedes that have been found in German greenhouses together with additional records for 29 such sites. Species lists are given for 46 greenhouses investigated throughout Germany. Thirty-five diplopod and 18 chilopod species were found to occur in greenhouses, of which 15 (3 Chilopoda, 12 Diplopoda) are restricted to this type of habitat. First records for Germany include Anadenobolus monilicornis (Porat, 1876), Epinannolene cf. trinidadensis Chamberlin, 1918, Epinannolene sp., Mesoiulus gridellii Strasser, 1934, Leptogoniulus sorornus (Butler, 1876), Rhinotus purpureus (Pocock, 1894), Cryptops doriae Pocock, 1891, Lamyctes coeculus (Br\ölemann, 1889) and Tygarrup javanicus (Attems, 1907). The millipedes Oxidus gracilis (C. L. Koch, 1847) and Amphitomeus attemsi (Schubart, 1934) and the centipedes Lithobius forficatus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Cryptops hortensis (Donovan, 1810) are the species most frequently found in greenhouses.

}, keywords = {centipedes, first records, Germany, hothouse, millipedes, review}, issn = {1314-2828}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1066}, url = {https://bdj.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=1066}, author = {Decker, Peter and Reip, Hans S. and Voigtl{\"a}nder, Karin} } @article {1425, title = {[Letter to Ludwig D{\"o}derlein]}, year = {1898}, month = {08/08/1898}, publisher = {Archives de la Ville et de l{\textquoteright}Eurom{\'e}tropole de Strasbourg}, address = {Strasbourg, Grand Est, France}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Verhoeff, C. W. (1898, August 8). [Letter to Ludwig D\öderlein]. Archives de la Ville et de l\’Eurom\étropole de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Grand Est, France.

}, author = {Verhoeff, Carl Wilhelm} } @article {1403, title = {Ciempi{\'e}s de Sinaloa, M{\'e}xico (Myriapoda: Chilopoda): nuevos registros de especies y ampliaci{\'o}n de su distribuci{\'o}n estatal}, journal = {Dugesiana}, volume = {26}, year = {2019}, month = {25/07/2019}, pages = {79-85}, abstract = {

Resumen: Se han registrado siete especies y una subespecie de ciempi\és en Sinaloa. El estudio de nuevo material, recolectado de 2016 a 2018, permiti\ó identificar 12 especies de ciempi\és, de las cuales ocho representan nuevos registros estatales. Las otras cuatro especies, previamente documentadas para el estado, son registradas en nuevas localidades. Presentamos una lista con los nuevos registros para el estado de Dendrothereua linceci (Wood, 1867), Scolopendra morsitants Linnaeus, 1758, Newportia quadrimeropus (Shelley \& Mercurio, 2005), N. stolli (Pocock, 1896), Pachymerium ferrugineum (Koch, 1835), Mecistocephalus guildingii Newport, 1843, Notiphilides maximiliani (Humbert \& Saussure, 1870) y Orphnaeus brevilabiatus (Newport,1845), as\í como nuevos registros de localidades para Arthrorhabdus pygmaeus (Pocock, 1895), S. polymorpha Wood, 1861, S. viridis Say, 1821 y Rhysida longipes (Newport, 1845). La lista actualizada de especies de ciempi\és para Sinaloa es de 15 especies y una subespecie. En M\éxico, el estado est\á clasificado octavo en riqueza de ciempi\és.

Centipedes of Sinaloa, Mexico (Myriapoda: Chilopoda): new species records and expansion of its regional distribution

Abstract: Seven species and one subspecies of centipedes have been recorded in Sinaloa. The study of new specimens, collected from 2016 to 2018, identified 12 centipedes species, eigth of them are new state records. The other four species, previously recorded in the state, were registered in new localities. We present a list with the new state records of Dendrothereua linceci (Wood, 1867), Scolopendra morsitants Linnaeus, 1758, Newportia quadrimeropus (Shelley \& Mercurio, 2005), N. stolli (Pocock, 1896), Pachymerium ferrugineum (Koch, 1835), Mecistocephalus guildingii Newport, 1843, Notiphilides maximiliani (Humbert \& Saussure, 1870) and Orphnaeus brevilabiatus (Newport,1845), and new localities records from Arthrorhabdus pygmaeus (Pocock, 1895), S. polymorpha Wood, 1861, S. viridis Say, 1821 and Rhysida longipes (Newport, 1845). The current checklist of the Sinaloa state centipedes includes 15 species and one subspecies. In Mexico, the state is ranked eigth in centipedes richness.

}, keywords = {checklist, distribuci{\'o}n, distribution, Geophilomorpha, lista, richness, riqueza, Scolopendromorpha, Scutigeromorpha}, issn = {1405-4094, 2007-9133}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.32870/dugesiana.v26i2.7073}, url = {http://148.202.248.171/dugesiana/index.php/DUG/article/view/7073}, author = {L{\'o}pez-Bonel, Fernando and {\'A}vila-Gaxiola, Claudia Patricia and Cupul-Maga{\~n}a, Fabio G.} } @article {957, title = {Una nueva especie de ciempi{\'e}s del g{\'e}nero Ityphilus (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Ballophilidae) de Tamaulipas, M{\'e}xico}, journal = {Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad}, volume = {85}, year = {2014}, month = {Jan-09-2014}, pages = {723 - 727}, abstract = {

Una nueva especie de ciempi\és del g\énero Ityphilus Cook, 1899, I. cifuentesi sp. nov., se describe a partir de un solo ejemplar macho recolectado en la cueva El Pach\ón, Tamaulipas, M\éxico. Esta es la especie n\úmero 27 descrita para el g\énero a nivel mundial y la segunda para M\éxico. Adem\ás, \éste es el tercer registro de una especie de ciempi\és de la familia Ballophilidae para M\éxico.

}, keywords = {Ballophilidae, Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha, Ityphilus}, issn = {18703453}, doi = {10.7550/rmb.43796}, url = {http://www.revista.ib.unam.mx/index.php/bio/article/view/41}, author = {Cupul-Maga{\~n}a, Fabio Germ{\'a}n} } @article {944, title = {Myriapodes chilopodes et diplopodes des souterrains de Paris et de sa proche banlieue}, journal = {Spelunca, 5e s{\'e}rie}, year = {2020}, month = {03/2020}, pages = {39-47}, abstract = {

Une campagne d\’\échantillonnage des invert\ébr\és a \ét\é men\ée dans les r\éseaux souterrains de la ville de Paris et de la banlieue proche. Le pr\ésent travail pr\ésente les r\ésultats obtenus concernant les myriapodes (chilopodes et diplopodes) issus de ces r\écoltes. Six esp\èces de chilopodes (Classe Chilopoda) et neuf esp\èces de diplopodes (Classe Diplopoda) ont pu \être identifi\ées. Parmi ces derni\ères, certaines esp\èces sont nouvelles pour les d\épartements des Yvelines, des Hauts-de-Seine et de la Seine-Saint-Denis. Ces r\ésultats contribuent \à l\&$\#$39;enrichissement des inventaires et atlas des myriapodes de France (project INAMYFRA).

}, issn = {0242-1771}, url = {https://publications.ffspeleo.fr/bulletin.php?id=25999}, author = {Geoffroy, Jean-Jacques and Ferrand, Marina} } @booklet {866, title = {Newsletter of the British Myriapod and Isopod Group, 41, Autumn 2020}, year = {2020}, abstract = {

The newsletter includes items on: Centipede atlas update. The Darwin Tree of Life project. Luminous centipedes. Some rainforest goodies. Paul Richards giving an introduction to millipedes. Hebridean fossil millipedes in the Times.

Published: 15.11.2020 (website upload date, communicated by Steve Gregory).

}, url = {https://www.bmig.org.uk/sites/www.bmig.org.uk/files/news/BMIGnews41-2020.pdf}, author = {Helen J. Read} } @article {411, title = {Monograph of the Class Myriapoda, Order Chilopoda; with Observations on the General Arrangement of the Articulata. Part II}, journal = {Transactions of the Linnean Society of London}, volume = {19}, year = {1845}, month = {05/11/1845}, pages = {349-439}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Newport, G. (1845): Monograph of the Class Myriapoda, Order Chilopoda; with Observations on the General Arrangement of the Articulata.\  Part\  II. Transactions\  of\  the\  Linnean\  Society\  of London, 19 (4): 349-439 + plate 40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1842.tb00370.x

}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1842.tb00370.x}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/16638}, author = {Newport, George} } @article {316, title = {Some records of chilopods from Florida}, journal = {Entomological news}, volume = {69}, year = {1958}, month = {18/01/1958}, pages = {13-14}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.10387}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/2739482}, author = {Chamberlin, Ralph V} } @article {210, title = {New data on the family Himantariidae Bollman, 1893 (Chilopoda Geophilomorpha) from Kazakhstan}, journal = {Ecologica Montenegrina}, volume = {28}, year = {2020}, month = {29/02/2020}, pages = {61-66}, abstract = {

Polyporogaster porosa (Sseliwanoff, 1881) is new to the fauna of Kazakhstan; Bothriogaster signata (Kessler, 1874) is new to the fauna of the South Kazakhstan Region, while Stigmatogaster sp. is new to the East Kazakhstan Region. The distribution-map of all members of the family Himantariidae occurring in Kazakhstan and an identification key are provided.

}, keywords = {Bothriogaster, Central Asia, Chilopoda, fauna, Himantariidae, new records, Polyporogaster, Stigmatogaster}, issn = {2336-9744}, url = {https://www.biotaxa.org/em/article/view/60201}, author = {Yurii V. Dyachkov} } @article {195, title = {A common terminology for the external anatomy of centipedes (Chilopoda)}, journal = {ZooKeys}, volume = {69}, year = {2010}, month = {18/11/2010}, pages = {17-51}, abstract = {

A common terminology for the external morphological characters of centipedes (Chilopoda) is proposed. Terms are selected from the alternatives used in the English literature, preferring those most frequently used or those that have been introduced explicitly. A total of 330 terms are defined and illustrated, and another ca. 500 alternatives are listed.

}, keywords = {Chilopoda, morphology, terminology}, issn = {1313-2989}, doi = {10.3897/zookeys.69.737}, url = {http://zookeys.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=2466}, author = {Bonato, Lucio and Edgecombe, Gregory D. and Lewis, John G. E. and Minelli, Alessandro and Pereira, Luis A. and Shelley, Rowland M. and Marzio Zapparoli} } @article {3, title = {Checklist of the centipedes (Chilopoda) of Hispaniola}, journal = {Novitates Caribaea}, volume = {12}, year = {2018}, pages = {74-101}, chapter = {74}, abstract = {

Ten years have passed since the last checklist of Hispaniolan Chilopoda was done and the last bibliographic compendium was published. In this work we expand the former list of species and bibliography, update the taxonomic classification and provide an assessment on Chilobase records. A new intensive literature review was performed and both recent and formerly overlooked myriapodological works were included. The treatment of supraspecific taxonomic ranks was updated and follows Chilobase 2.0. This catalogue lists 4 fossil taxa as well as 24 extant species of centipedes from Hispaniola, 9 of which are endemic. For each extant species considered, there is information on Hispaniolan synonymies and geographic distribution. Included are some clarifications on synonymies and locality problems, and species with uncertain taxonomic status are indicated. Chilobase 2.0 was tested for completeness and accuracy. We propose several updates, grouped by incorrect species records, records not backed by known literature and species not under their currently accepted synonym. We also recommend chilopodologists to maintain active collaboration and send their updates to this useful database.

}, keywords = {centipedes, Chilobase, Chilopoda, Dominican Republic, EoL, fauna, Haiti, Hispaniola, ITIS, MCZbase, MyriaLit}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.33800/nc.v0i12.86}, url = {http://novitatescaribaea.do/index.php/novitates/article/view/86/155}, author = {Carlos A. Mart{\'\i}nez-Mu{\~n}oz and Perez-Gelabert, Daniel E} }