01004nas a2200121 4500008004100000245010500041210007300146260003700219300001200256520042300268100002800691856016300719 2002 eng d00aArácnidos y miriápodos: alacranes, arañas, ciempiés y otros parientes artrópodos poco conocidos0 aArácnidos y miriápodos alacranes arañas ciempiés y otros parient aCuliacánbEl Colegio de Sinaloa a211-2193 a

Recommended citation: Sánchez-Vargas, D. A. (2002): Arácnidos y miriápodos: alacranes, arañas, ciempiés y otros parientes artrópodos poco conocidos. Pp. 211-219. In: Cifuentes-Lemus, J. L., Gaxiola-López, J. (Eds.). Atlas de la biodiversidad de Sinaloa. México: El Colegio de Sinaloa.

Publication date: 10/2002.

1 aSánchez-Vargas, D., A. uhttps://myriatrix.myspecies.info/content/ar%C3%A1cnidos-y-miri%C3%A1podos-alacranes-ara%C3%B1as-ciempi%C3%A9s-y-otros-parientes-artr%C3%B3podos-poco-conocidos01155nas a2200193 4500008004100000022002500041245003100066210002400097300001000121490000600131520065000137653001500787653001700802653001000819653001700829100002300846700002100869856007100890 1990 eng d a0939-7140, 2326-268000aOn the centipedes of Yemen0 acentipedes of Yemen a61-700 v43 a

Summary: Six species of Scolopendromorpha and two of Geophilomorpha are recorded from Yemen. All are well known species. The collection contained no Lithobiomorpha or Scutigeromorpha.

Kurzfassung: 6 Arten von Scolopendromorpha und zwei Arten von Geophilomorpha wurden im Yemen nachgewiesen. Alle Arten sind bekannt. Die Aufsammlung enthielt keine Lithobiomorpha und Scutigeromorpha.

Recommended citation: Lewis, J. G. E. and Wranik, W. (1990): On the centipedes of Yemen. Zoology in the Middle East, 4 (1): 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09397140.1990.10637589

10acentipedes10aSouth Arabia10aYemen10azoogeography1 aLewis, John, G. E.1 aWranik, Wolfgang uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09397140.1990.1063758902996nas a2200145 4500008004100000022003600041245020800077210006900285260001500354300000900369490000800378520237900386100003102765856005402796 2013 eng d a0749-6737, 1942-1354, 1942-136200aAn annotated list of the centipedes (Chilopoda) in the National Collection of Arachnids, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Addendum: Scutigeromorpha and Scolopendromorpha0 aannotated list of the centipedes Chilopoda in the National Colle c28/02/2013 a1-100 v2823 a

Abstract: This addendum to “An annotated list of the centipedes (Chilopoda) in The National Collection of Arachnids (Colección Nacional de Arácnidos, CNAN), Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México” (México City), is based on new samples deposited in the last three years. It updates the preliminary list of 197 samples determined to genus and/or species. In this paper a total of 132 samples were added: Scutigeromorpha, 27; and Scolopendromorpha, 105. It also provides new state distribution records for Dendrothereua linceci (Wood, 1867), Scolopendra morsitans Linnaeus, 1758, S. polymorpha Wood, 1861, Rhysida immarginata (Porat, 1876), Scolopocryptops melanostomus Newport, 1845, Newportia spinipes Pocock, 1896, and Ectonocryptoides quadrimeropus Shelley and Mercurio, 2005.

Resumen: Adiciones a la “Lista anotada de ciempiés (Chilopoda) de la Colección Nacional de Arácnidos (CNAN) del Instituto de Biología de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México” (Ciudad de México), se realizaron a partir de la revisión de nuevas muestras depositadas en los últimos tres años. Con estas adiciones se actualiza la lista preliminar de 197 muestras determinadas a nivel de género y/o especie. En este trabajo se adicionan en total 132 muestras: Scutigeromorpha, 27; y Scolopendromorpha, 105. También se proporcionan nuevos registros de distribución estatal para Dendrothereua linceci (Wood, 1867), Scolopendra morsitans Linnaeus, 1758, S. polymorpha Wood, 1861, Rhysida immarginata (Porat, 1876), Scolopocryptops melanostomus Newport, 1845, Newportia spinipes Pocock, 1896, y Ectonocryptoides quadrimeropus Shelley y Mercurio, 2005.

Recommended citation: Cupul-Magaña, F.G. (2013): An annotated list of the centipedes (Chilopoda) in the National Collection of Arachnids, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Addendum: Scutigeromorpha and Scolopendromorpha. Insecta Mundi, 282: 1-10. https://journals.flvc.org/mundi/article/view/0282

1 aCupul-Magaña, Fabio, Gán uhttps://journals.flvc.org/mundi/article/view/028200765nas a2200145 4500008004100000022001400041245009400055210007000149260001500219300001000234490000700244520027100251100003100522856006600553 2009 eng d a1405-409400aNuevas localidades para quilópodos (Chilopoda) en la costa de Jalisco y Sinaloa, México0 aNuevas localidades para quilópodos Chilopoda en la costa de Jali c28/12/2009 a81-850 v163 a

Recommended citation: Cupul-Magaña, F. G. (2009): Nuevas localidades para quilópodos (Chilopoda) en la costa de Jalisco y Sinaloa, México. Dugesiana, 16 (2): 81-85. https://doi.org/10.32870/dugesiana.v14i2.3827

1 aCupul-Magaña, Fabio, Gán uhttp://dugesiana.cucba.udg.mx/index.php/DUG/article/view/393501666nas a2200157 4500008004100000022002500041245008600066210006900152260001500221300000900236490000800245520102400253100002201277700002401299856018501323 2021 eng d a0008-347X, 1918-324000aThe biota of Canada: checklist of the centipedes of Canada (Myriapoda: Chilopoda)0 abiota of Canada checklist of the centipedes of Canada Myriapoda  c31/12/2021 a1-120 v1543 a

The centipede fauna of Canada is reviewed based on information available in the literature and on examination of some material, and provincial and territorial distributions are provided. About 53 species are known from Canada, representing four orders: Scutigeromorpha (1), Scolopendromorpha (5), Geophilomorpha (19), and Lithobiomorpha (28). British Columbia has the most recorded species (23), followed by Ontario (17) and Newfoundland and Labrador (12). Arctogeophilus glacialis (Attems) and Alaskobius adlatus Chamberlin are newly reported from Canada (Northwest Territories), Schendyla nemorensis (Koch) is newly reported from Ontario, and Lithobius forficatus (Linnaeus) is recorded for the first time from New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island. Arctogeophilus melanonotus (Wood) is removed from the list of Canadian species.

1 aLangor, David, W.1 aLangor, Stephen, D. uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-entomologist/article/abs/biota-of-canada-checklist-of-the-centipedes-of-canada-myriapoda-chilopoda/EDF1261C878100D1A7AAFC3DA3671C1000797nas a2200205 4500008004100000022001400041245008700055210006900142300001200211490000600223520019000229653001500419653001300434653001700447653001100464653001600475653001200491100001800503856007000521 1980 eng d a0077-996200aSome arthropods recently intercepted entering New Zealand in orchids from Honduras0 aSome arthropods recently intercepted entering New Zealand in orc a127-1290 v73 a

A shipment of Laelia orchids from Honduras was found to have many arthropods in the hollow pseudobulbs, in particular ants and termites, on its arrival in New Zealand.

10aArthropods10aHonduras10ainterception10aLaelia10aNew Zealand10aorchids1 aKeall, J., B. uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00779962.1980.972235101894nas a2200121 4500008004100000245014700041210006900188300001000257490000700267520133500274100002601609856013701635 1993 eng d00aList of terrestrial invertebrates of St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands (exclusive of Acarina and Insecta), with some records of freshwater species0 aList of terrestrial invertebrates of St John US Virgin Islands e a30-380 v293 a

Abstract: A list is given of the terrestrial invertebrates known to occur on St. John, with the exception of the Acarina and Insects. Included are: Platyhelminthes (land planarian) – 1; Mollusca (snails and slugs) – 32; Annelida (earthworms) – 1; Onychophora (Peripatus) – 1; Crustacea (woodlice, beachhoppers, crabs) – 28; Arachnida (scorpions, pseudoscorpions, harvestmen, spiders, etc.) – 120; Myriapoda (centipedes, millipedes, etc.) – 19. In addition, a few freshwater species are noted. A bibliography of all works referring to these animals is provided.


Resumen: Se provee una lista de los invertebrados terrestres conocidos de St. John, con la excepción de Acarina e Insecta. Se incluyen: Platyhelminthes (planaria terrestre) – 1; Mollusca (caracoles y babosas) – 32; Annelida (lombrices de tierra) – 1; Onychophora (Peripatus) – 1; Crustacea (carcomas, saltarines, cangrejos) - 28; Arachnida (escorpiones, pseudoescorpiones, opiliones, arañas, etc.) – 120; Myriapoda (ciempiés, milpiés) – 19. También son informadas varias especies dulceacuícolas. Se provee una bibliografía que incluye todos los trabajos referentes a estos animales.

1 aMuchmore, William, B. uhttps://myriatrix.myspecies.info/content/list-terrestrial-invertebrates-st-john-us-virgin-islands-exclusive-acarina-and-insecta-some04216nas a2200565 4500008004100000022001400041245011200055210006900167260001500236300001400251490000700265520256200272653001602834653002402850653001902874653002202893653001602915653001302931653001502944653001802959653002002977653001902997100002303016700002503039700002103064700002103085700002503106700002303131700002503154700003003179700002203209700002803231700002103259700001703280700002503297700002703322700001803349700002203367700002403389700002003413700001503433700002203448700002503470700001903495700001903514700001803533700002303551700001803574856005803592 2022 eng d a1464-793100aFeeding habits and multifunctional classification of soil-associated consumers from protists to vertebrates0 aFeeding habits and multifunctional classification of soilassocia c20/01/2022 a1057-11170 v973 a

Soil organisms drive major ecosystem functions by mineralising carbon and releasing nutrients during decomposition processes, which supports plant growth, aboveground biodiversity and, ultimately, human nutrition. Soil ecologists often operate with functional groups to infer the effects of individual taxa on ecosystem functions and services. Simultaneous assessment of the functional roles of multiple taxa is possible using food-web reconstructions, but our knowledge of the feeding habits of many taxa is insufficient and often based on limited evidence. Over the last two decades, molecular, biochemical and isotopic tools have improved our understanding of the feeding habits of various soil organisms, yet this knowledge is still to be synthesised into a common functional framework. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the feeding habits of consumers in soil, including protists, micro-, meso- and macrofauna (invertebrates), and soil-associated vertebrates. We have integrated existing functional group classifications with findings gained with novel methods and compiled an overarching classification across taxa focusing on key universal traits such as food resource preferences, body masses, microhabitat specialisation, protection and hunting mechanisms. Our summary highlights various strands of evidence that many functional groups commonly used in soil ecology and food-web models are feeding on multiple types of food resources. In many cases, omnivory is observed down to the species level of taxonomic resolution, challenging realism of traditional soil food-web models based on distinct resource-based energy channels. Novel methods, such as stable isotope, fatty acid and DNA gut content analyses, have revealed previously hidden facets of trophic relationships of soil consumers, such as food assimilation, multichannel feeding across trophic levels, hidden trophic niche differentiation and the importance of alternative food/prey, as well as energy transfers across ecosystem compartments. Wider adoption of such tools and the development of open interoperable platforms that assemble morphological, ecological and trophic data as traits of soil taxa will enable the refinement and expansion of the multifunctional classification of consumers in soil. The compiled multifunctional classification of soil-associated consumers will serve as a reference for ecologists working with biodiversity changes and biodiversity?ecosystem functioning relationships, making soil food-web research more accessible and reproducible.

10afatty acids10afeeding preferences10afood resources10afunctional traits10agut content10aomnivory10aSoil fauna10asoil food web10astable isotopes10atrophic guilds1 aPotapov, Anton, M.1 aBeaulieu, Frédéric1 aBirkhofer, Klaus1 aBluhm, Sarah, L.1 aDegtyarev, Maxim, I.1 aDevetter, Miloslav1 aGoncharov, Anton, A.1 aGongalsky, Konstantin, B.1 aKlarner, Bernhard1 aKorobushkin, Daniil, I.1 aLiebke, Dana, F.1 aMaraun, Mark1 aDonnell, Rory, J. Mc1 aPollierer, Melanie, M.1 aSchaefer, Ina1 aShrubovych, Julia1 aSemenyuk, Irina, I.1 aSendra, Alberto1 aTuma, Jiri1 aTůmová, Michala1 aVassilieva, Anna, B.1 aChen, Ting-Wen1 aGeisen, Stefan1 aSchmidt, Olaf1 aTiunov, Alexei, V.1 aScheu, Stefan uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.1283203460nas a2200277 4500008004100000022002500041245012900066210007100195260001500266300001000281490000700291520257600298653001402874653001802888653001702906653001902923653001002942653001302952653001202965653002202977653002002999100002703019700003803046700002903084856006903113 2019 eng d a1405-4094, 2007-913300aCiempiés de Sinaloa, México (Myriapoda: Chilopoda): nuevos registros de especies y ampliación de su distribución estatal0 aCiempiés de Sinaloa México Myriapoda Chilopoda nuevos registros  c25/07/2019 a79-850 v263 a

Resumen: Se han registrado siete especies y una subespecie de ciempiés en Sinaloa. El estudio de nuevo material, recolectado de 2016 a 2018, permitió identificar 12 especies de ciempiés, de las cuales ocho representan nuevos registros estatales. Las otras cuatro especies, previamente documentadas para el estado, son registradas en nuevas localidades. Presentamos una lista con los nuevos registros para el estado de Dendrothereua linceci (Wood, 1867), Scolopendra morsitants Linnaeus, 1758, Newportia quadrimeropus (Shelley & Mercurio, 2005), N. stolli (Pocock, 1896), Pachymerium ferrugineum (Koch, 1835), Mecistocephalus guildingii Newport, 1843, Notiphilides maximiliani (Humbert & Saussure, 1870) y Orphnaeus brevilabiatus (Newport,1845), así como nuevos registros de localidades para Arthrorhabdus pygmaeus (Pocock, 1895), S. polymorpha Wood, 1861, S. viridis Say, 1821 y Rhysida longipes (Newport, 1845). La lista actualizada de especies de ciempiés para Sinaloa es de 15 especies y una subespecie. En México, el estado está clasificado octavo en riqueza de ciempiés.

Centipedes of Sinaloa, Mexico (Myriapoda: Chilopoda): new species records and expansion of its regional distribution

Abstract: Seven species and one subspecies of centipedes have been recorded in Sinaloa. The study of new specimens, collected from 2016 to 2018, identified 12 centipedes species, eigth of them are new state records. The other four species, previously recorded in the state, were registered in new localities. We present a list with the new state records of Dendrothereua linceci (Wood, 1867), Scolopendra morsitants Linnaeus, 1758, Newportia quadrimeropus (Shelley & Mercurio, 2005), N. stolli (Pocock, 1896), Pachymerium ferrugineum (Koch, 1835), Mecistocephalus guildingii Newport, 1843, Notiphilides maximiliani (Humbert & Saussure, 1870) and Orphnaeus brevilabiatus (Newport,1845), and new localities records from Arthrorhabdus pygmaeus (Pocock, 1895), S. polymorpha Wood, 1861, S. viridis Say, 1821 and Rhysida longipes (Newport, 1845). The current checklist of the Sinaloa state centipedes includes 15 species and one subspecies. In Mexico, the state is ranked eigth in centipedes richness.

10achecklist10adistribución10adistribution10aGeophilomorpha10alista10arichness10ariqueza10aScolopendromorpha10aScutigeromorpha1 aLópez-Bonel, Fernando1 aÁvila-Gaxiola, Claudia, Patricia1 aCupul-Magaña, Fabio, G. uhttp://148.202.248.171/dugesiana/index.php/DUG/article/view/707301938nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245011800055210007000173260001200243300001000255490000600265520122300271653001401494653001801508653001701526653001101543653001101554653001401565653001501579653001301594100003101607856005801638 2016 eng d a2307-695X00aPrimer registro del ciempiés Rhysida longipes (Newport, 1845) (Scolopendromorpha: Scolopendridae) en Cuba0 aPrimer registro del ciempiés iRhysida longipesi Newport 1845 Sco c01/2016 a87-910 v43 a

Resumen: Se presenta el primer registro conocido para Cuba del ciempiés escolopendromorfo Rhysida longipes (Newport, 1845). Los especímenes se recolectaron en el municipio de Marianao en la Ciudad de La Habana. Los ejemplares son probablemente de origen Neotropical pero, en teoría, podrían haber llegado desde cualquier lugar dentro de su área de distribución tropical, la cual comprende Asia, África y América.

First record of the centipede Rhysida longipes (Newport, 1845) (Scolopendromorpha: Scolopendridae) from Cuba

Abstract: The first known record from Cuba of the scolopendromorph centipede Rhysida longipes (Newport, 1845) is reported. The specimens were collected in Marianao municipality, Havana City. The exemplars are probably Neotropical in origin, but theoretically, they could have come from anywhere within the species' tropical range, which encompasses Asia, Africa and America.

Bibliographic remark: Article PDF misprinted as "VOL. 4 • N.o 23". It is "VOL. 4 • N.o 3".

10aChilopoda10adistribución10adistribution10aHabana10aHavana10aMyriapoda10aTaxonomía10aTaxonomy1 aCupul-Magaña, Fabio, Gán uhttp://www.rccb.uh.cu/index.php/RCCB/article/view/12201475nas a2200265 4500008004100000022001400041245006000055210005800115260001500173300001200188490000600200520077600206653001400982653001800996653001501014653001001029653001201039653001801051653001201069653001101081653001301092653001601105100002101121856006701142 2019 eng d a2624-282600aBurmese (Myanmar) amber checklist and bibliography 20180 aBurmese Myanmar amber checklist and bibliography 2018 c28/02/2019 a22–840 v23 a

A list of all known taxa described or recorded from Burmese amber from the published literature up to the end of 2018 is given, along with a comprehensive bibliography. The history of the study of inclusions is summarised, and demonstrates that the number of species has risen exponentially over the past two decades. The first three species were named in 1916 and by the end of 1920 a total of 42 species had been named by T.D.A. Cockerell. Only three more species were named by 1999 though by the end of 2018 the total had risen to an incredible 1,192 species, of which over half were named in the past three years. Some 320 species were named in 2018, the highest number described from one type of amber in any one year in the entire history of amber studies.

10aArachnids10aBurmese amber10aCretaceous10afungi10ainsects10ainvertebrates10aMyanmar10aplants10aprotists10avertebrates1 aRoss, Andrew, J. uhttps://www.mapress.com/pe/article/view/palaeoentomology.2.1.502432nas a2200229 4500008004100000022002500041245005800066210005600124260001500180300001000195490000700205520177100212653001901983653001902002653001402021653002202035653002002057653001502077653001302092100003102105856006602136 2013 eng d a1405-4094, 2007-913300aLa diversidad de los ciempiés (Chilopoda) de México0 aLa diversidad de los ciempiés Chilopoda de México c30/08/2013 a17-410 v203 a

Resumen: Este trabajo presenta un registro histórico de la taxonomía de los ciempiés (Chilopoda) descritos para México. En el país se han registrado 180 especies (una fósil) incluidas en 77 géneros, 17 familias y cuatro órdenes. Veintiséis géneros y 155 especies son endémicos (una especie fósil). Sólo una familia es endémica: Eriphantidae (Geophilomorpha). A nivel de género, son reconocibles cuatro elementos biogeográficos en los ciempiés de México: endémico, Holártico, Neártico y Neotropical. Se anexa una lista de las especies de ciempiés conocidas para el país, la cual incluye los estados en donde se han recolectado. La diversidad y distribución de los ciempiés en México todavía es pobremente conocida y subestimada.

Mexican Diversity of Centipedes (Chilopoda)

Abstract: This paper provides a historical account about of taxonomy of Mexican fauna of centipedes (Chilopoda). A total of 180 identified species (one fossil) in 77 genera, 17 families and four orders have been recorded for Mexico. Twenty-six genera and 155 species are endemic (one fossil). Only one family is endemic: Eriphantidae (Geophilomorpha). At the generic level, four biogeographical elements are recognizable in Mexican centipedes: endemic, Holartic, Neartic, and Neotropical. This work includes a checklist with the centipedes species cited for Mexico and the states of this country where each species has been collected. The diversity and distribution of Mexican centipedes is still poorly known and underestimated.

10aGeophilomorpha10aLithobiomorpha10aMyriapoda10aScolopendromorpha10aScutigeromorpha10aTaxonomía10aTaxonomy1 aCupul-Magaña, Fabio, Gán uhttp://dugesiana.cucba.udg.mx/index.php/DUG/article/view/407601475nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245005200055210005200107260001500159300000900174490000700183520087700190653001701067653002001084653001901104653001601123653001701139100001601156700001501172700001401187856004401201 2020 eng d a2072-665100aCentipede Venom Peptides Acting on Ion Channels0 aCentipede Venom Peptides Acting on Ion Channels c05/04/2020 a1-180 v123 a

Centipedes are among the oldest venomous arthropods that use their venom to subdue the prey. The major components of centipede venom are a variety of low-molecular-weight peptide toxins that have evolved to target voltage-gated ion channels to interfere with the central system of prey and produce pain or paralysis for efficient hunting. Peptide toxins usually contain several intramolecular disulfide bonds, which confer chemical, thermal and biological stability. In addition, centipede peptides generally have novel structures and high potency and specificity and therefore hold great promise both as diagnostic tools and in the treatment of human disease. Here, we review the centipede peptide toxins with reported effects on ion channels, including Nav, Kv, Cav and the nonselective cation channel polymodal transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1).

10aanimal toxin10acentipede venom10adrug discovery10aion channel10apeptide drug1 aChu, YanYan1 aQiu, PeiJu1 aYu, RiLei uhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/12/4/23000469nas a2200145 4500008004100000022001400041245005600055210005600111260001200167300000900179100002200188700003100210700002800241856005400269 1989 eng d a1021-029600aCatálogo de los artrópodos terrestres no insectos0 aCatálogo de los artrópodos terrestres no insectos c03/1989 a1-551 aMaes, Jean-Michel1 aPalacios-Vargas, José, G.1 aJiménez, María, Luisa uhttp://www.bio-nica.info/RevNicaEntomo/7-full.pdf00879nas a2200169 4500008004100000245005900041210005600100300001000156490000700166520038800173653001400561653001000575653001400585100003000599700001700629856006300646 2018 eng d00aCatalogue of Chilean centipedes (Myriapoda, Chilopoda)0 aCatalogue of Chilean centipedes Myriapoda Chilopoda a27-370 v903 a

A review of all literature, published between 1847 and 2016, provides a comprehensive inventory of research on Chilean Chilopoda. A total of 4 orders, 10 families, 28 genera and 70 species were recorded, highlighting the diversity of Chilopoda species in Chile. The geographical distribution and habitat preferences of all species are given with reference to the literature.

10acatalogue10aChile10aChilopoda1 aVega-Román, Emmanuel, A.1 aRuiz, Victor uhttp://www.soil-organisms.org/index.php/SO/article/view/7104163nas a2200277 4500008004100000245009200041210007200133260007100205300000700276520333800283653001403621653001603635653001503651653001403666653001503680653001303695653001403708653001403722653001403736653001403750653001303764653001603777653001603793100002203809856005403831 2020 eng d00aKaryotypová variabilita stonožkovců (Myriapoda) / Karyotype variability of Myriapoda0 aKaryotypová variabilita stonožkovců Myriapoda Karyotype variabil aPraguebUniverzita Karlova, Přírodovědecká fakultac13/07/2020 a383 a

Abstrakt: Bakalářská práce pojednává o diploidních počtech chromozomů, jejich morfologii a chromozomovém mechanismu určení pohlaví u čtyřech tříd podkmene Myriapoda. Pozornost je zároveň věnována vzájemným fylogenetickým vztahům v rámci podkmene. Přehled literatury ukazuje míru prozkoumanosti cytogenetických charakteristik u jednotlivých tříd, která je zejména ve třídách Pauropoda a Symphyla stále velmi nízká a v rámci třídy Diplopoda je stále ještě velké množství řádů, kde nám tyto informace zcela chybí. Cytogenetické analýzy odhalily celkové rozpětí počtu chromozomů pro: Pauropoda 2n = 12 – 27, Symphyla 2n = 11 – 18, Chilopoda 2n = 14 – 54 a Diplopoda 2n = 8 – 30. V rámci všech čtyř tříd se vyskytují jak morfologicky nediferencované pohlavní chromozomy, tak systémy typu XX/XY a XX/X0. Navíc je u řádu Spirostreptida uváděný i systém X1X1X2X2/X1X20. Pouze u malého množství druhů z řádů Glomerida, Calipodida, Julida, Spirostreptida a Lithobiomorpha a čeledi Scutigerellidae se podařilo identifikovat výskyt NORů. V práci se také podařilo identifikovat některé neshody mezi údaji různých prací, kdy se ukazuje, že zejména některé starší studie byly postaveny na špatném pozorování chromozomů v karyotypu.

Karyotype variability of Myriapoda

Abstract: The bachelor thesis deals with diploid numbers of chromosomes, their morphology and chromosome mechanism of sex determination in four classes of the subphylum Myriapoda. Attention is also paid to mutual phylogenetic relationships within the subphylum. A review of the literature shows the degree of examination of cytogenetic characteristics in individual classes, which is still very low, especially in the classes Pauropoda and Symphyla, and within the class Diplopoda there are still a large number of orders where we completely lack this information. Cytogenetic analyzes revealed a total range of chromosome numbers for: Pauropoda 2n = 12 - 27, Symphyla 2n = 11 - 18, Chilopoda 2n = 14 - 54 and Diplopoda 2n = 8 - 30. Within all four classes, there are both morphologically undifferentiated sex chromosomes and XX/XY and XX/X0 systems. In addition, the X1X1X2X2/X1X20 system is mentioned for the order Spirostreptida. Only a small number of species from the orders Glomerida, Calipodida, Julida, Spirostreptida, Lithobiomorpha and from family Scutigerellidae were able to identify the occurrence of NORs. The work also managed to identify some discrepancies between the data of different works, which shows that especially some older studies were based on poor observation of chromosomes in the karyotype.

10aChilopoda10achromosomes10achromozomy10aDiplopoda10afylogeneze10akaryotyp10akaryotype10aMyriapoda10aPauropoda10aphylogeny10aSymphyla10avariabilita10avariability1 aKášová, Adéla uhttps://dspace.cuni.cz/handle/20.500.11956/11972500502nas a2200133 4500008004100000245002900041210002800070260001500098300001200113490000700125520015100132100001600283856006900299 1955 eng d00aMyriapoden aus Peru, III0 aMyriapoden aus Peru III c15/07/1955 a173-2000 v363 a

Recommended citation: Kraus, O. (1955): Myriapoden aus Peru, III. Senckenbergiana biologica, 36 (3/4): 173-200.

1 aKraus, Otto uhttps://myriatrix.myspecies.info/content/myriapoden-aus-peru-iii01297nas a2200133 4500008004100000245014800041210006900189260001500258300000900273490000700282520071000289100002600999856013801025 1955 eng d00aReports of the Lund University Chile Expedition 1948-49. 18. The Chilopoda of the Lund University and California Academy of Science Expeditions0 aReports of the Lund University Chile Expedition 194849 18 The Ch c30/04/1955 a1-610 v513 a

Recommended citation: Chamberlin, R. V. (1955): Reports of the Lund University Chile Expedition 1948-49. 18. The Chilopoda of the Lund University and California Academy of Science Expeditions. Lunds universitets årsskrift, n. f., avd. 2, 51 (5): 1-61.

Remarks: The articles in the Lunds universitets årsskrift, n. f., bear two parallel numbering systems, one for the volumes of the årsskrift and one for the volumes of the “Kungl. Fysiografiska sällskapets handlingar, ny följd”. This article can be cited as above or as “Kungl. Fysiografiska sällskapets handlingar, n. f., 66 (5): 1-61”.

1 aChamberlin, Ralph, V. uhttps://myriatrix.myspecies.info/content/reports-lund-university-chile-expedition-1948-49-18-chilopoda-lund-university-and-california01559nas a2200157 4500008004100000022001400041245011100055210006900166260001500235300000900250490000700259520103100266100002701297700002301324856005401347 2021 eng d a2041-172300aPhylogenetic analyses suggest centipede venom arsenals were repeatedly stocked by horizontal gene transfer0 aPhylogenetic analyses suggest centipede venom arsenals were repe c05/02/2021 a1-140 v123 a

Venoms have evolved over a hundred times in animals. Venom toxins are thought to evolve mostly by recruitment of endogenous proteins with physiological functions. Here we report phylogenetic analyses of venom proteome-annotated venom gland transcriptome data, assisted by genomic analyses, to show that centipede venoms have recruited at least five gene families from bacterial and fungal donors, involving at least eight horizontal gene transfer events. These results establish centipedes as currently the only known animals with venoms used in predation and defence that contain multiple gene families derived from horizontal gene transfer. The results also provide the first evidence for the implication of horizontal gene transfer in the evolutionary origin of venom in an animal lineage. Three of the bacterial gene families encode virulence factors, suggesting that horizontal gene transfer can provide a fast track channel for the evolution of novelty by the exaptation of bacterial weapons into animal venoms.

1 aUndheim, Eivind, A. B.1 aJenner, Ronald, A. uhttp://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-21093-801601nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001500214300001200229490000700241520090700248653001501155653001201170653001501182653001701197653001501214100002701229700002101256700002401277856007001301 2020 eng d a0022-432400aA taxonomic key for nine first record species of Chilopoda-Arthropoda in Central Iraq0 ataxonomic key for nine first record species of ChilopodaArthropo c15/05/2020 a608-6140 v513 a

This study aimed to classified some species of Chilopoda which is the first record in Iraq. The samples collected from April 2018 to March 2019, in some areas of central of Iraq, which are: Baghdad, Anbar, Babylon, Diyala and Qadisiyah. We found nine species from 183 numbers of samples. The species we recorded for a first time in Iraq are: Scolopendra amazonica, S. afer, Cormocephalus nigrificatus, Cryptops anomalans, Geophilus flavus, Haplophilus souletinus, Lithobius microps, Lamyctes emarginatus and Scutigera coleoptrata. The species were supported by photos, then the samples where stored in Iraq Natural History Research center and Museum.

Remark: Keywords are wrong and were not added. The printed keywords belong to the subsequent article (by the same authors) in the issue.

10aChoneiulus10aJulidae10amillipedes10aPolydesmidae10aPolydesmus1 aAl-Doori, Maysaloon, L1 aAzooz, Hayder, W1 aAl-Door, Nibrass, L uhttps://www.lepidopteraresearchfoundation.org/abstract.php?id=21005224nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245020300055210006900258260001500327300001000342490000800352520424000360653001904600653002304619653001604642653001504658653001004673100002004683700002004703700002204723856024904745 2020 eng d a0037-928X00aDistribution and indicator value of intertidal centipedes from Mediterranean beaches within and around Port-Cros National Park (Southern France), with proposal of a simplified monitoring (Chilopoda)0 aDistribution and indicator value of intertidal centipedes from M c20/03/2020 a41-620 v1253 a

Abstract: A study on centipedes living on beaches within and around Port-Cros National Park was conducted during the spring of 2019, using hand-collection along transects. One hundred and twenty chilopods (108 of them being Geophilomorpha) were collected, including the halophilous species Henia bicarinata (Dignathodontidae), Geophilus fucorum and Tuoba poseidonis (Geophilidae). The halophilic character of H. bicarinata and G. fucorum was confirmed on the seashore of continental France while T. poseidonis was considered strictly halophilic. Pachymerium ferrugineum (Geophilidae) was considered only halotolerant, in the way it is not restricted to the coastline area. The dominant sediments were observed to have a moderate influence on the presence of halophilous and halobiontic geophilomorphs, with gravel sediments having a more favourable effect. In addition, microhabitats provided by pebbles are of significant importance for halophilic species while the presence of stranded Posidonia seems useful for these species. The availability of driftwood is favourable only when it gives a limited contact with the substrate or the stranded Posidonia layer. Lastly, the impact of human frequentation was very significant regarding halophilic species; all these species were found to be absent where human activity was high. The presence or absence of halophilic centipedes well shows the conservation state of the shore for species living in this habitat. An experimental easy monitoring with identification sheets is given to determine the conservation state of beaches in South-Eastern France.

Répartition et valeur indicatrice des Chilopodes intertidaux des plages méditerranéennes dans et autour du Parc national de Port-Cros (sud de la France), avec proposition d’une méthode d’évaluation simplifiée (Chilopoda)

Résumé: Une étude sur les Chilopodes des plages dans et autour du Parc national de Port-Cros a été réalisée au printemps 2019, à l’aide de récoltes manuelles dans des transects. Cent-vingt chilopodes (108 de ceux-ci étant des Geophilomorpha) ont été collectés, incluant les espèces halophiles Henia bicarinata (Dignathodontidae), Geophilus fucorum et Tuoba poseidonis (Geophilidae). Le caractère halophile d’H. bicarinata et de G. fucorum est confirmé sur le littoral français, tandis que T. poseidonis est considéré comme strictement halophile (= halobie). Pachymerium ferrugineum (Geophilidae) est seulement considéré comme halotolérant, dans le sens où il n’est pas restreint aux milieux salés littoraux en France. Les sédiments dominants ont une influence modérée sur la présence des halophiles et halobiontes, avec les sédiments graveleux ayant un effet plus favorable. En complément, les micro-habitats fournis par les galets sont d’importance significative pour eux ; quant aux posidonies échouées, elles semblent utiles. La disponibilité de bois échoués est considérée comme favorable uniquement quand ils sont en contact étroit avec le substrat ou la couche de posidonies échouées. Enfin, l’impact de la fréquentation humaine est très significatif sur les espèces halophiles : toutes ces espèces sont absentes quand la fréquentation humaine est élevée. La présence ou absence des chilopodes halophiles est un bon indicateur de l’état de conservation des plages pour les espèces d’Arthropodes inféodées à cet habitat. Un suivi expérimental simplifié avec des fiches d’identification est donné pour déterminer l’état de conservation des plages dans le sudest de la France.

10aGeophilomorpha10ahalophilic species10aHyères Var10aMonitoring10awrack1 aIorio, Étienne1 aGeoffroy, David1 aPétillon, Julien uhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/340067094_Distribution_and_indicator_value_of_intertidal_centipedes_from_Mediterranean_beaches_within_and_around_Port-Cros_National_Park_Southern_France_with_proposal_of_a_simplified_monitoring_Chilopoda01282nas a2200145 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214300001000226520079400236100002701030700002001057856005901077 2020 eng d a0242-177100aMyriapodes chilopodes et diplopodes des souterrains de Paris et de sa proche banlieue0 aMyriapodes chilopodes et diplopodes des souterrains de Paris et  c03/2020 a39-473 a

Une campagne d’échantillonnage des invertébrés a été menée dans les réseaux souterrains de la ville de Paris et de la banlieue proche. Le présent travail présente les résultats obtenus concernant les myriapodes (chilopodes et diplopodes) issus de ces récoltes. Six espèces de chilopodes (Classe Chilopoda) et neuf espèces de diplopodes (Classe Diplopoda) ont pu être identifiées. Parmi ces dernières, certaines espèces sont nouvelles pour les départements des Yvelines, des Hauts-de-Seine et de la Seine-Saint-Denis. Ces résultats contribuent à l'enrichissement des inventaires et atlas des myriapodes de France (project INAMYFRA).

1 aGeoffroy, Jean-Jacques1 aFerrand, Marina uhttps://publications.ffspeleo.fr/bulletin.php?id=2599901650nas a2200217 4500008004100000022001400041245017400055210006900229260001500298300001200313490000700325520083800332653001701170653000801187653002601195653001301221653005901234653003601293100002401329856007901353 2020 eng d a0136-006X00aNew data on the scutigeromorph and scolopendromorph centipedes (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha: Scutigeridae; Scolopendromorpha: Scolopendridae, Cryptopidae) from Kazakhstan0 aNew data on the scutigeromorph and scolopendromorph centipedes C c19/06/2020 a173-1840 v293 a

The scutigeromorph fauna of Kazakhstan comprises at least three species in three genera in one family, while the scolopendromorph one consists of three species in two genera in two families. The family Cryptopidae, the genus Cryptops, and the species C. doriae Pocock, 1891 and C. hortensis (Donovan, 1810) are new to the Kazakhstan list, while C. doriae in also new to the entire Palaearctic. Scolopendra canidens Newport, 1844 is new to Kazakhstan’s Kyzylorda and Turkestan regions, while Scutigera coleoptrata (Linnaeus, 1758) to the Akmola Region. Some morphological characters of scolopendromorph species are discussed and illustrated. An identification key to the scutigeromorph and scolopendromorph centipedes of Kazakhstan is given. All records are mapped.

10aCentral Asia10akey10anew faunistic records10aключ10aновые фаунистические находки10aЦентральная Азия1 aDyachkov, Yurii, V. uhttps://kmkjournals.com/journals/AS/AS_Index_Volumes/AS_29/AS_29_2_173_18400991nas a2200133 4500008004100000245002700041210002500068260002900093300000900122490000700131520064300138100002400781856005200805 1895 eng d00aChilopoda. Part CXXVI.0 aChilopoda Part CXXVI aLondonbTaylor & Francis a1-240 v143 a

Recommended citation: Pocock, R. I. (1895): Chilopoda. Part CXXVI, signatures B-D, pp. 1-24 + pls. i-ii [December 1895]. In: Godman, F. D. & O. Salvin (Eds.). Biologia Centrali-Americana; or, Contributions to the Knowledge of the Fauna and Flora of Mexico and Central America. Zoology. Pocock, R. I. (1895-1910): Volume 14. Chilopoda and Diplopoda. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. i + 1-217, pls. i-xv. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/576430

Link to plate i: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/576648

Link to plate ii: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/576650

1 aPocock, Reginald, I uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/57643001204nas a2200421 4500008004100000245007500041210006900116300001200185490000700197653001400204653002400218653001900242653001600261653001300277653002400290653001800314653001600332653001900348653001600367653001600383653001700399653001900416653001600435653001900451653001600470653001600486653001400502653001600516653001500532653001600547653002200563653001400585653002000599653001900619653001700638100001700655856011000672 1997 eng d00aTracheal systems in Chilopoda: a comparison under phylogenetic aspects0 aTracheal systems in Chilopoda a comparison under phylogenetic as a49–600 v5110aChilopoda10aCraterostigmomorpha10aCraterostigmus10aCryptopidae10aCryptops10aElektronenmikroskop10aG.carpophagus10aGeophilidae10aGeophilomorpha10aH.gabrielis10aHimentarium10aL.forficatus10aLichtmikroskop10aLithobiidae10aLithobiomorpha10aMikroskopie10amorphologie10aMyriapoda10aOnychophora10aPhylogenie10aScolopendra10aScolopendromorpha10aScutigera10aScutigeromorpha10aTracheensystem10avergleichend1 aHilken, Gero uhttps://myriatrix.myspecies.info/content/tracheal-systems-chilopoda-comparison-under-phylogenetic-aspects01169nas a2200409 4500008004100000245006500041210006500106300001100171490000700182653001400189653002400203653001900227653001600246653002300262653002400285653001800309653001600327653001900343653001600362653001600378653001700394653001900411653001600430653001900446653001600465653001600481653001500497653001600512653001600528653002200544653001400566653002000580653001900600653001700619100001700636856010600653 1998 eng d00aVergleich von Tracheensystemen unter phylogenetischem Aspekt0 aVergleich von Tracheensystemen unter phylogenetischem Aspekt a5–940 v3710aChilopoda10aCraterostigmomorpha10aCraterostigmus10aCryptopidae10aCryptops hortensis10aElektronenmikroskop10aG.carpophagus10aGeophilidae10aGeophilomorpha10aH.gabrielis10aHimentarium10aL.forficatus10aLichtmikroskop10aLithobiidae10aLithobiomorpha10aMikroskopie10amorphologie10aPhylogenie10aS.cingulata10aScolopendra10aScolopendromorpha10aScutigera10aScutigeromorpha10aTracheensystem10avergleichend1 aHilken, Gero uhttps://myriatrix.myspecies.info/content/vergleich-von-tracheensystemen-unter-phylogenetischem-aspekt01924nas a2200217 4500008004100000245012000041210006900161260001200230300001400242490000700256520127800263653001401541653001501555653001401570653001101584653001201595653001301607100002001620700001701640856004901657 2018 eng d00aChecklist of the Myriapoda in Cretaceous Burmese amber and a correction of the Myriapoda identified by Zhang (2017)0 aChecklist of the Myriapoda in Cretaceous Burmese amber and a cor c12/2020 a1131-11400 v143 a

An inventory of the Myriapoda (Diplopoda, Chilopoda, Symphyla) from Cretaceous Burmese amber, Myanmar, is presented, including the oldest and/or first fossil record for numerous orders. For millipedes (Diplopoda) 527 records, including 460 new specimens determined by us, belonging to 13 of 16 recent orders are listed: Polyxenida, Glomeridesmida, Glomerida, Siphonophorida, Polyzoniida, Platydesmida, Siphoniulida, Chordeumatida, Polydesmida, Stemmiulida, Callipodida, Spirostreptida and Spirobolida. For centipedes, 33 records for 4 of the 5 recent orders are listed: Scutigeromorpha, Lithobiomorpha, Scolopendromorpha and Geophilomorpha. For Symphyla, three records for both families, Scutigerellidae and Scolopendrellidae, are listed. The majority of Diplopoda records (30.5%) are Polydesmida. The record of the Polyzoniida includes first instar octopod juveniles. The checklist includes the first fossil representatives known of the Platydesmida, as well as the oldest known fossils of the Polyxenida, Glomeridesmida, Glomerida, Siphonophorida, Polyzoniida, Siphoniulida, Spirostreptida, as well as both Symphyla families. Misidentifications by Zhang (2017) are corrected; while most Chilopoda in that list are correct, almost all Diplopoda are misidentified.

10aChilopoda10aCretaceous10aDiplopoda10afossil10aMyanmar10aSymphyla1 aWesener, Thomas1 aMoritz, Leif uhttps://checklist.pensoft.net/article/30320/02624nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245006100055210006100116260001500177300000900192490000800201520194600209653001902155653002702174653001802201653002302219653001902242100002002261700002402281700002202305856006702327 2020 eng d a0965-174800aDiversity and evolution of the P450 family in arthropods0 aDiversity and evolution of the P450 family in arthropods c22/10/2020 a1-220 v1273 a

The P450 family (CYP genes) of arthropods encodes diverse enzymes involved in the metabolism of foreign compounds and in essential endocrine or ecophysiological functions. The P450 sequences (CYPome) from 40 arthropod species were manually curated, including 31 complete CYPomes, and a maximum likelihood phylogeny of nearly 3000 sequences is presented. Arthropod CYPomes are assembled from members of six CYP clans of variable size, the CYP2, CYP3, CYP4 and mitochondrial clans, as well as the CYP20 and CYP16 clans that are not found in Neoptera. CYPome sizes vary from two dozen genes in some parasitic species to over 200 in species as diverse as collembolans or ticks. CYPomes are comprised of few CYP families with many genes and many CYP families with few genes, and this distribution is the result of dynamic birth and death processes. Lineage-specific expansions or blooms are found throughout the phylogeny and often result in genomic clusters that appear to form a reservoir of catalytic diversity maintained as heritable units. Among the many P450s with physiological functions, six CYP families are involved in ecdysteroid metabolism. However, five so-called Halloween genes are not universally represented and do not constitute the unique pathway of ecdysteroid biosynthesis. The diversity of arthropod CYPomes has only partially been uncovered to date and many P450s with physiological functions regulating the synthesis and degradation of endogenous signal molecules (including ecdysteroids) and semiochemicals (including pheromones and defense chemicals) remain to be discovered. Sequence diversity of arthropod P450s is extreme, and P450 sequences lacking the universally conserved Cys ligand to the heme have evolved several times. A better understanding of P450 evolution is needed to discern the relative contributions of stochastic processes and adaptive processes in shaping the size and diversity of CYPomes.

10aDetoxification10aEcdysteroid metabolism10aGene clusters10aOrthologous groups10aP450 Evolution1 aDermauw, Wannes1 aVan Leeuwen, Thomas1 aFeyereisen, René uhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S096517482030179X03914nas a2200505 4500008004100000022001400041245012800055210006900183260001500252300000900267490000700276520241600283653002402699653001302723653002302736653002102759653001802780653001802798653002102816653001202837653001902849100002702868700002002895700002202915700002102937700002202958700001802980700001702998700001703015700001803032700002303050700002003073700002303093700002403116700001803140700002403158700002803182700002703210700001903237700002003256700001403276700001903290700002103309856007803330 2020 eng d a1471-214800aFour myriapod relatives – but who are sisters? No end to debates on relationships among the four major myriapod subgroups0 aFour myriapod relatives but who are sisters No end to debates on c04/11/2020 a1-150 v203 a

Background: Phylogenetic relationships among the myriapod subgroups Chilopoda, Diplopoda, Symphyla and Pauropoda are still not robustly resolved. The first phylogenomic study covering all subgroups resolved phylogenetic relationships congruently to morphological evidence but is in conflict with most previously published phylogenetic trees based on diverse molecular data. Outgroup choice and long-branch attraction effects were stated as possible explanations for these incongruencies. In this study, we addressed these issues by extending the myriapod and outgroup taxon sampling using transcriptome data.

Results: We generated new transcriptome data of 42 panarthropod species, including all four myriapod subgroups and additional outgroup taxa. Our taxon sampling was complemented by published transcriptome and genome data resulting in a supermatrix covering 59 species. We compiled two data sets, the first with a full coverage of genes per species (292 single-copy protein-coding genes), the second with a less stringent coverage (988 genes). We inferred phylogenetic relationships among myriapods using different data types, tree inference, and quartet computation approaches. Our results unambiguously support monophyletic Mandibulata and Myriapoda. Our analyses clearly showed that there is strong signal for a single unrooted topology, but a sensitivity of the position of the internal root on the choice of outgroups. However, we observe strong evidence for a clade Pauropoda+Symphyla, as well as for a clade Chilopoda+Diplopoda.

Conclusions: Our best quartet topology is incongruent with current morphological phylogenies which were supported in another phylogenomic study. AU tests and quartet mapping reject the quartet topology congruent to trees inferred with morphological characters. Moreover, quartet mapping shows that confounding signal present in the data set is sufficient to explain the weak signal for the quartet topology derived from morphological characters. Although outgroup choice affects results, our study could narrow possible trees to derivatives of a single quartet topology. For highly disputed relationships, we propose to apply a series of tests (AU and quartet mapping), since results of such tests allow to narrow down possible relationships and to rule out confounding signal.

 

10aArthropod phylogeny10aconflict10aConfounding signal10aInternal rooting10aPhylogenetics10aphylogenomics10aQuartet topology10aRNA-Seq10aTranscriptomes1 aSzucsich, Nikolaus, U.1 aBartel, Daniela1 aBlanke, Alexander1 aBöhm, Alexander1 aDonath, Alexander1 aFukui, Makiko1 aGrove, Simon1 aLiu, Shanlin1 aMacek, Oliver1 aMachida, Ryuichiro1 aMisof, Bernhard1 aNakagaki, Yasutaka1 aPodsiadlowski, Lars1 aSekiya, Kaoru1 aTomizuka, Shigekazu1 aVon Reumont, Björn, M.1 aWaterhouse, Robert, M.1 aWalzl, Manfred1 aMeng, Guanliang1 aZhou, Xin1 aPass, Günther1 aMeusemann, Karen uhttps://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-020-01699-004755nas a2200133 4500008004100000245013400041210007100175260001200246300001900258520412800277100002004405700002004425856017604445 2020 eng d00aÉtude des myriapodes de Martinique, avec un pré-atlas partiel et une évaluation préliminaire de leurs enjeux «patrimoniaux»0 aÉtude des myriapodes de Martinique avec un préatlas partiel et u c01/2020 a72 p + annexes3 a

Les myriapodes comptent plus de 15 000 espèces décrites dans le monde. De nombreuses espèces jouent un rôle primordial pour le fonctionnement des écosystèmes naturels   et cultivés. La Martinique fait partie du «hotspot» de biodiversité  de  la Caraïbe, pourtant  aucune étude ne s’est focalisée sur ce groupe en Martinique. Ce travail avait  pour objectif de combler ce manque en (i) compilant les données issues de la littérature grise, (ii) en faisant des déterminations des spécimens contenus dans diverses collections et, (iii) en réalisant des collectes ciblées de nouveaux échantillons. A l’issue de ce  travail, la connaissance de la biodiversité de ces deux groupes, en particulier des chilopodes qui étaient les plus méconnus, a nettement progressé. 28 espèces de chilopodes et 29 espèces de diplopodes ont été citées au moins une fois en Martinique. Une nouvelle espèce pour la science, Schizonampa barberi Iorio & Coulis, 2019, a été décrite. Huit espèces de chilopodes ont été trouvées pour la première fois  sur l’île, dont deux nouveaux ordres: les Lithobiomorpha et les Scutigeromorpha. Deux espèces de diplopodes ont également été mentionnées pour la première fois en Martinique. Vingt-quatre fiches-espèces (12 chilopodes, 12 diplopodes) avec des cartographies des stations où elles ont été trouvées sont fournies. Ces fiches donnent aussi un aperçu de la répartition générale et des principaux caractères morphologiques qui distinguent chaque espèce. Il est très probable que des citations anciennes d’espèces, qui n’ont jamais été revues depuis, engendrent une surestimation du nombre total d’espèces (57); dont certaines espèces ponctuellement introduites et non acclimatées. Un travail de consultation des collections historiques de divers muséums restera à mener afin d’obtenir une estimation plus fiable du nombre d’espèces. Notre estimation plus parcimonieuse du nombre d’espèces de myriapodes martiniquais, basée sur les taxons a priori non ambigus, est d’environ 50. L’intérêt «patrimonial» des chilopodes et  des diplopodes est néanmoins très important en Martinique, avec l’existence de nombreux endémiques. Le pourcentage d’endémiques stricts est d’au minimum 14% et le pourcentage d’endémiques dits «restreints» (cf. TOUROULT, 2012) s’élève à 32% pour les myriapodes en prenant l’estimation de 50 espèces. En conclusion, notre travail a permis une avancée conséquente des connaissances myriapodologiques. Toutefois, de nombreuses  lacunes demeurent, en particulier sur les chilopodes. Ce travail ouvre des perspectives pour améliorer les connaissances sur la répartition des espèces car des secteurs entiers restent inexplorés (en particulier littoraux). De plus, des collaborations avec des collègues étrangers pour étudier les taxons encore inconnus permettraient de faire progresser les connaissances taxonomiques de ce groupe. Ces actions permettraient à  terme la réalisation d’une Liste Rouge UICN en Martinique.

Recommended citation:

IORIO É. & COULIS M., 2020. – Étude des myriapodes de Martinique. Avec un pré-atlas partiel et une évaluation préliminaire de leurs enjeux «patrimoniaux». Rapport de Martinique Entomologie pour la DEAL Martinique: 72 p. + annexe.

1 aIorio, Étienne1 aCoulis, Mathieu uhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/341072126_Etude_des_myriapodes_de_Martinique_avec_un_pre-atlas_partiel_et_une_evaluation_preliminaire_de_leurs_enjeux_patrimoniaux02214nas a2200265 4500008004100000022001400041245018400055210006900239260001500308300001000323490000800333520136200341653001401703653003201717653001501749653002501764100001501789700001901804700001901823700001601842700001201858700001601870700001501886856004701901 2020 eng d a1313-298900aThe complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Scolopendra mutilans L. Koch, 1878 (Scolopendromorpha, Scolopendridae), with a comparative analysis of other centipede genomes0 acomplete mitochondrial genome sequence of iScolopendra mutilansi c08/04/2020 a73-880 v9253 a

Scolopendra mutilans L. Koch, 1878 is an important Chinese animal with thousands of years of medicinal history. However, the genomic information of this species is limited, which hinders its further application. Here, the complete mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) of S. mutilans was sequenced and assembled by next-generation sequencing. The genome is 15,011 bp in length, consisting of 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 14 tRNA genes, and two rRNA genes. Most PCGs start with the ATN initiation codon, and all PCGs have the conventional stop codons TAA and TAG. The S. mutilans mitogenome revealed nine simple sequence repeats (SSRs), and an obviously lower GC content compared with other seven centipede mitogenomes previously sequenced. After analysis of homologous regions between the eight centipede mitogenomes, the S. mutilans mitogenome further showed clear genomic rearrangements. The phylogenetic analysis of eight centipedes using 13 conserved PCG genes was finally performed. The phylogenetic reconstructions showed Scutigeromorpha as a separate group, and Scolopendromorpha in a sister-group relationship with Lithobiomorpha and Geophilomorpha. Collectively, the S. mutilans mitogenome provided new genomic resources, which will improve its medicinal research and applications in the future.

10aChilopoda10aChinese medicinal materials10amitogenome10aScolopendra mutilans1 aHu, Chaoyi1 aWang, Shuaibin1 aHuang, Bisheng1 aLiu, Hegang1 aXu, Lei1 aHu, Zhigang1 aLiu, Yifei uhttps://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/47820/01074nas a2200157 4500008004100000245020200041210007000243260000900313300001000322490000600332520037500338100002100713700002300734700002000757856013900777 2014 eng d00aWiederentdeckung des Gürtelskolopenders (Chilopoda: Scolopendra cingulata) im Neusiedlersee-Gebiet Österreichs, mit Anmerkungen zum Spinnenläufer (Chilopoda: Scutigera coleoptrata)0 aWiederentdeckung des Gürtelskolopenders Chilopoda iScolopendra c c2014 a63-730 v83 a

Full title: Wiederentdeckung des Gürtelskolopenders (Chilopoda: Scolopendra cingulata) im Neusiedlersee-Gebiet Österreichs, mit Anmerkungen zum Spinnenläufer (Chilopoda: Scutigera coleoptrata) und zum pannonischen Laufkäfer (Coleoptera: Carabus hungaricus) aus demselben Gebiet

 

1 aBöhme, Wolfgang1 aOeyen, Jan, Philip1 aWesener, Thomas uhttps://myriatrix.myspecies.info/content/wiederentdeckung-des-g%C3%BCrtelskolopenders-chilopoda-scolopendra-cingulata-im-neusiedlersee00512nas a2200121 4500008004100000245001800041210001800059300001200077490001000089520021000099100002700309856005400336 1814 eng d00aCrustaceology0 aCrustaceology a383-4370 v7 (2)3 a

Recommended citation: Leach, W. E. (1814): Crustaceology. In: Brewster’s Edinburgh Encyclopaedia, 7 (2): 383-437 + pl. 221. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/37187639

1 aLeach, William, Elford uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/3718763900339nas a2200109 4500008004100000245004300041210004300084300001200127490000700139100002900146856005400175 1878 eng d00aJapanesische Arachniden und Myriapoden0 aJapanesische Arachniden und Myriapoden a735-7980 v271 aKoch, Ludwig, Carl Chris uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/4288226901112nas a2200253 4500008004100000022001400041245007600055210006900131260001500200300001000215490000700225520036800232653001400600653001500614653001600629100001800645700002700663700002300690700002400713700002200737700002500759700002200784856005200806 2010 eng d a1313-298900aA common terminology for the external anatomy of centipedes (Chilopoda)0 acommon terminology for the external anatomy of centipedes Chilop c18/11/2010 a17-510 v693 a

A common terminology for the external morphological characters of centipedes (Chilopoda) is proposed. Terms are selected from the alternatives used in the English literature, preferring those most frequently used or those that have been introduced explicitly. A total of 330 terms are defined and illustrated, and another ca. 500 alternatives are listed.

10aChilopoda10amorphology10aterminology1 aBonato, Lucio1 aEdgecombe, Gregory, D.1 aLewis, John, G. E.1 aMinelli, Alessandro1 aPereira, Luis, A.1 aShelley, Rowland, M.1 aZapparoli, Marzio uhttp://zookeys.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=246601913nas a2200193 4500008004100000245010400041210006900145260004600214520126200260653001601522653001401538653003101552653001601583653001601599653001401615653002601629100001801655856004601673 2015 eng d00aType specimens of centipedes (Myriapoda, Chilopoda) in the National Museum, Prague (Czech Republic)0 aType specimens of centipedes Myriapoda Chilopoda in the National aOlomouc, Czech RepublicbZooKeysc06/20153 a

The centipede collection in the National Museum in Prague contains type material of 16 taxa (14 species and two subspecies), of which 15 were described by Luděk J. Dobroruka and one by Karl W. Verhoeff: Allothereua wilsonae Dobroruka, 1979; Chinobius alenae Dobroruka, 1980; Lithobius corrigendus Dobroruka, 1988; L. creticus Dobroruka, 1977; L. erythrocephalus mohelensis Dobroruka, 1959; L. evae Dobroruka, 1958; L. magurensis Dobroruka, 1971; L. purkynei Dobroruka, 1957; L. tatricus Dobroruka, 1958; L. tatricus monounguis Dobroruka, 1958; Monotarsobius homolaci Dobroruka, 1971; M. krali Dobroruka, 1979; Pachymerium dilottiae Dobroruka, 1976; P. hanzaki Dobroruka, 1976; Scolopendra aztecorum Verhoeff, 1934 and Strigamia olympica Dobroruka, 1977. Of these 16 taxa, five were described from the Czech Republic, three from Slovakia and eight from other countries (Greece, Iraq, Kyrgyzstan, Mexico, Nepal, Russia and Uzbekistan). The eight taxa described from the Czech and Slovak Republics are now considered as junior synonyms but the eight taxa described from the other countries are still valid.

10aAllothereua10aLithobius10aLuděk Jindřich Dobroruka10aPachymerium10aScolopendra10aStrigamia10aZoological collection1 aDolejš, Petr uhttps://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/5513/01921nas a2200265 4500008004100000245005800041210005600099300001100155490000700166520120400173653001501377653001401392653001401406653002301420653000801443653001001451653001001461653001501471653000901486653001201495653001301507100003301520700003001553856007201583 2018 eng d00aChecklist of the centipedes (Chilopoda) of Hispaniola0 aChecklist of the centipedes Chilopoda of Hispaniola a74-1010 v123 a

Ten years have passed since the last checklist of Hispaniolan Chilopoda was done and the last bibliographic compendium was published. In this work we expand the former list of species and bibliography, update the taxonomic classification and provide an assessment on Chilobase records. A new intensive literature review was performed and both recent and formerly overlooked myriapodological works were included. The treatment of supraspecific taxonomic ranks was updated and follows Chilobase 2.0. This catalogue lists 4 fossil taxa as well as 24 extant species of centipedes from Hispaniola, 9 of which are endemic. For each extant species considered, there is information on Hispaniolan synonymies and geographic distribution. Included are some clarifications on synonymies and locality problems, and species with uncertain taxonomic status are indicated. Chilobase 2.0 was tested for completeness and accuracy. We propose several updates, grouped by incorrect species records, records not backed by known literature and species not under their currently accepted synonym. We also recommend chilopodologists to maintain active collaboration and send their updates to this useful database.

10acentipedes10aChilobase10aChilopoda10aDominican Republic10aEoL10afauna10aHaiti10aHispaniola10aITIS10aMCZbase10aMyriaLit1 aMartínez-Muñoz, Carlos, A.1 aPerez-Gelabert, Daniel, E uhttp://novitatescaribaea.do/index.php/novitates/article/view/86/155