01004nas a2200121 4500008004100000245010500041210007300146260003700219300001200256520042300268100002800691856016300719 2002 eng d00aArácnidos y miriápodos: alacranes, arañas, ciempiés y otros parientes artrópodos poco conocidos0 aArácnidos y miriápodos alacranes arañas ciempiés y otros parient aCuliacánbEl Colegio de Sinaloa a211-2193 a

Recommended citation: Sánchez-Vargas, D. A. (2002): Arácnidos y miriápodos: alacranes, arañas, ciempiés y otros parientes artrópodos poco conocidos. Pp. 211-219. In: Cifuentes-Lemus, J. L., Gaxiola-López, J. (Eds.). Atlas de la biodiversidad de Sinaloa. México: El Colegio de Sinaloa.

Publication date: 10/2002.

1 aSánchez-Vargas, D., A. uhttps://myriatrix.myspecies.info/content/ar%C3%A1cnidos-y-miri%C3%A1podos-alacranes-ara%C3%B1as-ciempi%C3%A9s-y-otros-parientes-artr%C3%B3podos-poco-conocidos02439nas a2200133 4500008004100000022004600041245004300087210003900130260006400169300001200233520200200245100001902247856003902266 2019 eng d a978-952-11-4973-3, ISBN 978-952-11-4974-000aTuhatjalkaiset - Myriapods - Myriapoda0 aTuhatjalkaiset Myriapods Myriapoda aHelsinkibYmpäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus a340-3433 a

Viittausohje, kun viitataan yksittäiseen Punaisen listan lukuun: Vahtera, V. 2019. Tuhatjalkaiset. Julk.: Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. (toim.) 2019. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus – Punainen kirja 2019. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus. Helsinki. S. 340-343. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Reference of a separate chapter of the Red List: Vahtera, V. 2019. Myriapods. In: Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. (eds.) 2019. The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species. Ministry of the Environment & Finnish Environment Institute. Helsinki. P. 340-343. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Summary: Myriapoda are a diverse group of terrestrial arthropods, some of which are herbivores, some predators and some decomposers. There are four classes of Myriapoda: centipedes (Chilopoda), millipedes (Diplopoda), pauropods (Pauropoda), and symphylans (Symphyla). In Finland, a total of 63 species have been found: 21 centipede, 28 millipede, eight pauropod, and six symphylan species. In total, there are ten red-listed species: the critically endangered (CR) Geophilus carpophagus, which was classified as Regionally Extinct (RE) in the two previous assessments, and the Near Threatened (NT) species G. electricus, G. truncorum and Julus scanicus. These species only have one known locality each, and no new observations have been made of the three Near Threatened (NT) species for a long time. Six species have been categorised as Data Deficient (DD). Many species were classified as Not Evaluated (NE) due to insufficient information on their occurrence. While no monitoring of Myriapoda has been organised in Finland, the information on the spread of the species in this country could be updated by organising a monitoring study of a few years in duration.

1 aVahtera, Varpu uhttp://hdl.handle.net/10138/29950108893nam a2200337 4500008004100000022004600041245005500087210005100142260006400193300000800257520789800265653001508163653002808178653001708206653000908223653002108232653001908253653001308272653001408285653001908299653002208318653002308340653002208363653002608385100002108411700001808432700002108450700002208471700002308493856003908516 2019 eng d a978-952-11-4973-3, ISBN 978-952-11-4974-000aSuomen lajien uhanalaisuus – Punainen kirja 20190 aSuomen lajien uhanalaisuus Punainen kirja 2019 aHelsinkibYmpäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus a7043 a

Tiivistelmä: Julkaisussa esitellään Suomen lajien viides uhanalaisuusarviointi. Suomen lajimäärän arvioidaan nykyään olevan vähintään 48 000. Riittävät tiedot uhanalaisuusarviointiin oli 22 418 lajista tai alemmasta taksonista, mikä on noin 47 % lajistosta. Uhanalaisiksi arvioitiin 2 668 lajia tai alempaa taksonia eli noin 11,9 % arvioiduista lajeista. Punaisen listan lajeja, joihin kuuluvat uhanalaisten lisäksi hävinneet, silmälläpidettävät ja puutteellisesti tunnetut on yhteensä 6 683 (29,8 %). Arvioiduista lajeista äärimmäisen uhanalaisia (CR) on 489, erittäin uhanalaisia (EN) 918, vaarantuneita (VU) 1 260, silmälläpidettäviä (NT) 1 912, puutteellisesti tunnettuja (DD) 1 792, hävinneitä (RE) 312 ja elinvoimaisia (LC) 15 735. Arviointi tehtiin Kansainvälisen luonnonsuojeluliiton (IUCN) ohjeiden ja kriteerien mukaan. IUCN:n alueellisen uhanalaisuusarvioinnin kriteerit perustuvat lajien havaittuun, arvioituun, pääteltyyn tai ennustettuun populaatioiden pienenemiseen, levinneisyys- tai esiintymisalueen kokoon, pieneen ja jatkuvasti taantuvaan tai hyvin pieneen populaatioon tai kvantitatiiviseen analyysiin. Lisäksi Suomessa on dokumentoitu lajien elinympäristöt sekä uhanalaisuuden syyt ja uhkatekijät. Enemmistö uhanalaisista lajeista elää metsissä (31 %) sekä perinneympäristöissä ja muissa ihmisen muuttamissa ympäristöissä (24 %). Uhanalaisten osuus kunkin elinympäristön arvioiduista lajeista on korkein tunturipaljakalla (37,9 %). Uhanalaisten lajien määrä on suurin hemiboreaalisella ja eteläboreaalisella vyöhykkeellä Etelä-Suomessa. Julkaisussa vertaillaan arvioinnin tuloksia vuoden 2010 tuloksiin esimerkiksi uhanalaisuusindeksin avulla. Lisäksi julkaisussa tarkastellaan vuoden 2010 uhanalaisuusarvioinnin ohjausryhmän ehdotusten toteutumista. Arvioinnin tulosten pohjalta Eliölajien uhanalaisuuden arvioinnin ohjausryhmä (LAUHA) esittää 13 toimenpide-ehdotusta uhanalaisten lajien suojelun, hoidon, tutkimuksen ja seurannan järjestämiseksi ja rahoittamiseksi. Arvioinnit on tehty eliöryhmäkohtaisissa työryhmissä ja työn tulokset esitellään eliöryhmittäin 39 luvussa.

Viittausohje, kun viitataan koko julkaisuun: Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. (toim.) 2019. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus – Punainen kirja 2019. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus. Helsinki. 704 s. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Sammandrag: I denna bok presenteras resultat av Finlands femte hotbedömning. Finlands artantal uppskattas för tillfället till minst 48 000. Tillräckliga uppgifter för hotbedömning fanns om 22 418 arter eller lägre taxa, vilket utgör 47 % av alla arter. Av dessa bedömdes 2 667 arter eller lägre taxa vara hotade, d.v.s. 11,9 %. Rödlistade arter, som förutom hotade arter även innefattar försvunna arter, nära hotade arter och arter som det råder kunskapsbrist om, uppgår till 6 683 (29,8 %). Av de bedömda arterna är 498 akut hotade (CR), 918 starkt hotade (EN), 1 260 sårbara (VU), 1 912 nära hotade (NT), 1 792 med kunskapsbrist (DD), 312 försvunna (RE) och 15 735 livskraftiga. Hoten har bedömts på basis av Internationella Naturvårdsunionens (IUCN) regionala hotbedömningskriterier. Kriterierna grundar sig på observerad, deduktiv eller estimerad minskning av populationer eller utbrednings- och förekomstområden, en liten och kontinuerligt minskande eller en mycket liten population eller på kvantitativ analys. Därutöver har arternas livsmiljö, hotorsak och hotfaktorer i Finland dokumenterats. Majoriteten av de hotade arterna lever i skogar (31 %), vårdbiotoper och andra kulturmiljöer (24 %). Antalet hotade arter är högst inom den hemiboreala och sydboreala zonen i södra Finland. Andelen hotade arter i en specifik habitattyp är högst i kalfjället(37,9 %). I publikationen jämförs resultaten av hotbedömningen med resultaten från år 2010 t.ex. med hjälp av rödlisteindexet. Vid sidan av bedömningsresultaten beskrivs de mest påtagliga administrativa och juridiska åtgärder som vidtagits för artskydd samt forskning och övervakning sedan den föregående bedömningen. Hotbedömningens styrgrupp (LAUHA ) föreslår 13 åtgärder för organisering och finansiering av skydd, vård, forskning och övervakning av hotade arter. Resultaten av bedömningen som är genomförd av expertgrupper presenteras i 39 kapitel som omfattar olika organismgrupper.

The Red List of Finnish Species 2019

Abstract: This publication describes the fifth assessment of Finnish threatened species. The current estimated number of species in Finland is at least 48,000. Sufficient information was available for the evaluation of 22,418 species or lower taxa, which is approximately 47% of all species. In total, 2,667 species or lower taxa (11.9%) were assessed as threatened. The red-listed species, which, in addition to threatened species, include the species classified as Regionally Extinct, Near Threatened, and Data Deficient, total 6,683 (29.8%). Of the species evaluated, 489 were classified as Critically Endangered (CR), 918 as Endangered (EN), 1,260 as Vulnerable (VU), 1,912 as Near Threatened (NT), 1,792 as Data Deficient (DD), 312 as Regionally Extinct (RE), and 15,735 as of Least Concern (LC). The assessment was carried out in accordance with guidelines and criteria issued by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and applied in assessments at the regional level. These criteria are based on observed, estimated, inferred, or projected population size reduction; the extent of occurrence or area of occupancy; continuing decline in a small population or a very small size of population; or a quantitative analysis. In addition, species’ habitats, as well as causes of threat and threat factors, were documented in the Finnish evaluation. The majority of threatened species live in forests (31%) and in rural biotopes and other cultural habitats (24%). Of the species assessed the proportion of threatened species is highest in Alpine habitats (37.9%). The number of threatened species is highest in the hemiboreal and southern boreal zones in southern Finland. The results of the assessment are compared to the previous assessment 2010 for example with the Red List Index. In addition, proceedings of the proposals given by the steering group of the previous assessment are evaluated. The steering group of this assessment made 13 proposals for measures for the arrangement and financing of the conservation, management, research, and monitoring of threatened species. The results of the work of the expert groups responsible for the evaluation are presented in 39 organism group -specific sections.

Reference of the publication: Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. (eds.) 2019. The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus. Helsinki. 704 p. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Publication date: 26/02/2019

10abedömning10aconservation of species10ahotade arter10aIUCN10alajiston suojelu10apunainen lista10aRed list10arödlista10askydd av arter10athreat assessment10athreatened species10auhanalaiset lajit10auhanalaisuusarviointi1 aHyvärinen, Esko1 aJuslén, Aino1 aKemppainen, Eija1 aUddström, Annika1 aLiukko, Ulla-Maija uhttp://hdl.handle.net/10138/29950101827nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245008600055210006900141260001500210300000900225490000600234520115100240653001501391653001801406653001201424653001301436653001501449653001101464100001801475700001901493700002401512856004901536 2014 eng d a1314-282800aMillipedes and centipedes in German greenhouses (Myriapoda: Diplopoda, Chilopoda)0 aMillipedes and centipedes in German greenhouses Myriapoda Diplop c11/04/2014 a1-430 v23 a

A review is given of all the literature records of millipedes and centipedes that have been found in German greenhouses together with additional records for 29 such sites. Species lists are given for 46 greenhouses investigated throughout Germany. Thirty-five diplopod and 18 chilopod species were found to occur in greenhouses, of which 15 (3 Chilopoda, 12 Diplopoda) are restricted to this type of habitat. First records for Germany include Anadenobolus monilicornis (Porat, 1876), Epinannolene cf. trinidadensis Chamberlin, 1918, Epinannolene sp., Mesoiulus gridellii Strasser, 1934, Leptogoniulus sorornus (Butler, 1876), Rhinotus purpureus (Pocock, 1894), Cryptops doriae Pocock, 1891, Lamyctes coeculus (Brölemann, 1889) and Tygarrup javanicus (Attems, 1907). The millipedes Oxidus gracilis (C. L. Koch, 1847) and Amphitomeus attemsi (Schubart, 1934) and the centipedes Lithobius forficatus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Cryptops hortensis (Donovan, 1810) are the species most frequently found in greenhouses.

10acentipedes10afirst records10aGermany10ahothouse10amillipedes10areview1 aDecker, Peter1 aReip, Hans, S.1 aVoigtländer, Karin uhttps://bdj.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=106604216nas a2200565 4500008004100000022001400041245011200055210006900167260001500236300001400251490000700265520256200272653001602834653002402850653001902874653002202893653001602915653001302931653001502944653001802959653002002977653001902997100002303016700002503039700002103064700002103085700002503106700002303131700002503154700003003179700002203209700002803231700002103259700001703280700002503297700002703322700001803349700002203367700002403389700002003413700001503433700002203448700002503470700001903495700001903514700001803533700002303551700001803574856005803592 2022 eng d a1464-793100aFeeding habits and multifunctional classification of soil-associated consumers from protists to vertebrates0 aFeeding habits and multifunctional classification of soilassocia c20/01/2022 a1057-11170 v973 a

Soil organisms drive major ecosystem functions by mineralising carbon and releasing nutrients during decomposition processes, which supports plant growth, aboveground biodiversity and, ultimately, human nutrition. Soil ecologists often operate with functional groups to infer the effects of individual taxa on ecosystem functions and services. Simultaneous assessment of the functional roles of multiple taxa is possible using food-web reconstructions, but our knowledge of the feeding habits of many taxa is insufficient and often based on limited evidence. Over the last two decades, molecular, biochemical and isotopic tools have improved our understanding of the feeding habits of various soil organisms, yet this knowledge is still to be synthesised into a common functional framework. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the feeding habits of consumers in soil, including protists, micro-, meso- and macrofauna (invertebrates), and soil-associated vertebrates. We have integrated existing functional group classifications with findings gained with novel methods and compiled an overarching classification across taxa focusing on key universal traits such as food resource preferences, body masses, microhabitat specialisation, protection and hunting mechanisms. Our summary highlights various strands of evidence that many functional groups commonly used in soil ecology and food-web models are feeding on multiple types of food resources. In many cases, omnivory is observed down to the species level of taxonomic resolution, challenging realism of traditional soil food-web models based on distinct resource-based energy channels. Novel methods, such as stable isotope, fatty acid and DNA gut content analyses, have revealed previously hidden facets of trophic relationships of soil consumers, such as food assimilation, multichannel feeding across trophic levels, hidden trophic niche differentiation and the importance of alternative food/prey, as well as energy transfers across ecosystem compartments. Wider adoption of such tools and the development of open interoperable platforms that assemble morphological, ecological and trophic data as traits of soil taxa will enable the refinement and expansion of the multifunctional classification of consumers in soil. The compiled multifunctional classification of soil-associated consumers will serve as a reference for ecologists working with biodiversity changes and biodiversity?ecosystem functioning relationships, making soil food-web research more accessible and reproducible.

10afatty acids10afeeding preferences10afood resources10afunctional traits10agut content10aomnivory10aSoil fauna10asoil food web10astable isotopes10atrophic guilds1 aPotapov, Anton, M.1 aBeaulieu, Frédéric1 aBirkhofer, Klaus1 aBluhm, Sarah, L.1 aDegtyarev, Maxim, I.1 aDevetter, Miloslav1 aGoncharov, Anton, A.1 aGongalsky, Konstantin, B.1 aKlarner, Bernhard1 aKorobushkin, Daniil, I.1 aLiebke, Dana, F.1 aMaraun, Mark1 aDonnell, Rory, J. Mc1 aPollierer, Melanie, M.1 aSchaefer, Ina1 aShrubovych, Julia1 aSemenyuk, Irina, I.1 aSendra, Alberto1 aTuma, Jiri1 aTůmová, Michala1 aVassilieva, Anna, B.1 aChen, Ting-Wen1 aGeisen, Stefan1 aSchmidt, Olaf1 aTiunov, Alexei, V.1 aScheu, Stefan uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.1283200430nas a2200121 4500008004100000245007900041210006900120260001500189300001000204490000600214100003300220856005500253 2021 eng d00aSome summary data and metrics on Myriapoda & Onychophora for the year 20200 aSome summary data and metrics on Myriapoda Onychophora for the y c17/11/2021 a28-300 v61 aMartínez-Muñoz, Carlos, A. uhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/35659884200469nas a2200145 4500008004100000022001400041245005600055210005600111260001200167300000900179100002200188700003100210700002800241856005400269 1989 eng d a1021-029600aCatálogo de los artrópodos terrestres no insectos0 aCatálogo de los artrópodos terrestres no insectos c03/1989 a1-551 aMaes, Jean-Michel1 aPalacios-Vargas, José, G.1 aJiménez, María, Luisa uhttp://www.bio-nica.info/RevNicaEntomo/7-full.pdf02448nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245008000055210006900135260001500204300000900219490000700228520175800235653001801993653002002011653001402031653002002045653002202065653002102087653001702108100002002125700001802145856004302163 2020 eng d a2075-445000aSoil Health and Arthropods: From Complex System to Worthwhile Investigation0 aSoil Health and Arthropods From Complex System to Worthwhile Inv c16/01/2020 a1-210 v113 a

The dramatic increase in soil degradation in the last few decades has led to the need to identify methods to define not only soil quality but also, in a holistic approach, soil health. In the past twenty years, indices based on living communities have been proposed alongside the already proven physical-chemical methods. Among them, some soil invertebrates have been included in monitoring programs as bioindicators of soil quality. Being an important portion of soil fauna, soil arthropods are involved in many soil processes such as organic matter decomposition and translocation, nutrient cycling, microflora activity regulation and bioturbation. Many studies have reported the use of soil arthropods to define soil quality; among taxa, some have been explored more in depth, typically Acari and Collembola, while generally less abundant groups, such as Palpigradi or Embioptera, have not been investigated much. This paper aims to evaluate and compare the use of different soil microarthropod taxa in soil degradation/quality studies to highlight which groups are the most reported for soil monitoring and which are the most sensitive to soil degradation. We have decided not to include the two most present and abundant taxa, Acari and Collembola, in this paper in consideration of the vast amount of existing literature and focus the discussion on the other microarthropod groups. We reported some studies for each taxon highlighting the use of the group as soil quality indicator. A brief section reporting some indices based on soil microarthropods is proposed at the end of this specific discussion. This paper can be considered as a reference point in the use of soil arthropods to estimate soil quality and health.

10abioindicators10amacroarthropods10amesofauna10amicroarthropods10asoil biodiversity10asoil degradation10asoil quality1 aMenta, Cristina1 aRemelli, Sara uhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/11/1/5404163nas a2200277 4500008004100000245009200041210007200133260007100205300000700276520333800283653001403621653001603635653001503651653001403666653001503680653001303695653001403708653001403722653001403736653001403750653001303764653001603777653001603793100002203809856005403831 2020 eng d00aKaryotypová variabilita stonožkovců (Myriapoda) / Karyotype variability of Myriapoda0 aKaryotypová variabilita stonožkovců Myriapoda Karyotype variabil aPraguebUniverzita Karlova, Přírodovědecká fakultac13/07/2020 a383 a

Abstrakt: Bakalářská práce pojednává o diploidních počtech chromozomů, jejich morfologii a chromozomovém mechanismu určení pohlaví u čtyřech tříd podkmene Myriapoda. Pozornost je zároveň věnována vzájemným fylogenetickým vztahům v rámci podkmene. Přehled literatury ukazuje míru prozkoumanosti cytogenetických charakteristik u jednotlivých tříd, která je zejména ve třídách Pauropoda a Symphyla stále velmi nízká a v rámci třídy Diplopoda je stále ještě velké množství řádů, kde nám tyto informace zcela chybí. Cytogenetické analýzy odhalily celkové rozpětí počtu chromozomů pro: Pauropoda 2n = 12 – 27, Symphyla 2n = 11 – 18, Chilopoda 2n = 14 – 54 a Diplopoda 2n = 8 – 30. V rámci všech čtyř tříd se vyskytují jak morfologicky nediferencované pohlavní chromozomy, tak systémy typu XX/XY a XX/X0. Navíc je u řádu Spirostreptida uváděný i systém X1X1X2X2/X1X20. Pouze u malého množství druhů z řádů Glomerida, Calipodida, Julida, Spirostreptida a Lithobiomorpha a čeledi Scutigerellidae se podařilo identifikovat výskyt NORů. V práci se také podařilo identifikovat některé neshody mezi údaji různých prací, kdy se ukazuje, že zejména některé starší studie byly postaveny na špatném pozorování chromozomů v karyotypu.

Karyotype variability of Myriapoda

Abstract: The bachelor thesis deals with diploid numbers of chromosomes, their morphology and chromosome mechanism of sex determination in four classes of the subphylum Myriapoda. Attention is also paid to mutual phylogenetic relationships within the subphylum. A review of the literature shows the degree of examination of cytogenetic characteristics in individual classes, which is still very low, especially in the classes Pauropoda and Symphyla, and within the class Diplopoda there are still a large number of orders where we completely lack this information. Cytogenetic analyzes revealed a total range of chromosome numbers for: Pauropoda 2n = 12 - 27, Symphyla 2n = 11 - 18, Chilopoda 2n = 14 - 54 and Diplopoda 2n = 8 - 30. Within all four classes, there are both morphologically undifferentiated sex chromosomes and XX/XY and XX/X0 systems. In addition, the X1X1X2X2/X1X20 system is mentioned for the order Spirostreptida. Only a small number of species from the orders Glomerida, Calipodida, Julida, Spirostreptida, Lithobiomorpha and from family Scutigerellidae were able to identify the occurrence of NORs. The work also managed to identify some discrepancies between the data of different works, which shows that especially some older studies were based on poor observation of chromosomes in the karyotype.

10aChilopoda10achromosomes10achromozomy10aDiplopoda10afylogeneze10akaryotyp10akaryotype10aMyriapoda10aPauropoda10aphylogeny10aSymphyla10avariabilita10avariability1 aKášová, Adéla uhttps://dspace.cuni.cz/handle/20.500.11956/11972502418nas a2200277 4500008004100000022001400041245012100055210006900176260001500245300000800260490000700268520155400275653002501829653002501854653002201879653001601901653002801917653002701945100002001972700001901992700002602011700001902037700002202056700001802078856004402096 2020 eng d a2073-439500aManagement Intensification of Hay Meadows and Fruit Orchards Alters Soil Macro- Invertebrate Communities Differently0 aManagement Intensification of Hay Meadows and Fruit Orchards Alt c28/05/2020 a1-90 v103 a

Land-use changes and especially management intensification currently pose a major threat to biodiversity both on and beneath the soil surface. With a comparative approach, we investigated how management intensity in orchards and meadows influences soil macro-invertebrate communities in a North-Italian Alpine region. We compared soil fauna assemblies from traditional low-input sites with respective intensively managed ones. As expected, the taxonomical richness and diversity were lower in both intensive management types. Extensive management of both types revealed similar communities, while intensification led to substantial differences between management types. From these results, we conclude that intensification of agricultural practices severely alters the soil fauna community and biodiversity in general, however, the direction of these changes is governed by the management type. In our view, extensive management, traditional for mountain areas, favors soil fauna communities that have adapted over a long time and can thus be viewed as a sustainable reference condition for new production systems that consider the protection of soil diversity in order to conserve essential ecosystem functions.

Recommended citation: Guariento E, Colla F, Steinwandter M, Plunger J, Tappeiner U, Seeber J. (2020): Management Intensification of Hay Meadows and Fruit Orchards Alters Soil Macro- Invertebrate Communities Differently. Agronomy, 10 (6), Art. 767: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060767

10amanagement intensity10amountain agriculture10asoil biodiversity10aSouth Tyrol10asustainable agriculture10atraditional management1 aGuariento, Elia1 aColla, Filippo1 aSteinwandter, Michael1 aPlunger, Julia1 aTappeiner, Ulrike1 aSeeber, Julia uhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/6/76704110nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245008100055210007000136260001500206300001000221490000700231520338500238653003703623653001403660653001703674653001403691653001303705100002203718700002203740700002503762856009303787 2019 eng d a1852-609800aInvertebrados exóticos nuevos o poco conocidos en la ciudad de Buenos Aires0 aInvertebrados exóticos nuevos o poco conocidos en la ciudad de B c02/12/2019 a48-670 v633 a

Resumen: Las especies invasoras pueden causar diversos problemas a nivel socioeconómico y para la conservación de la biodiversidad. La detección temprana de las especies naturalizadas puede ser de vital importancia para el monitoreo y la planificación de estrategias de contención del proceso de invasión. La fauna de planarias terrestres (Tricladida, Geoplanoidea), babosas terrestres (Mollusca, Limacidae), diplópodos (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) y sínfilos (Myriapoda, Symphylla) de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires se encuentra poco estudiada, y la adición de especies exóticas transportadas por las actividades humanas complejiza la situación de poco conocimiento. En este trabajo se dan a conocer nuevos registros de especies de estos grupos que se han naturalizado en el ámbito urbano de la ciudad y sus alrededores (Bipalium kewense, Austroplana sanguinea, Ambigolimax valentianus, Brachyiulus pusillus, Oxidus gracilis y Scutigerella immaculata). Se evaluó el potencial como invasor de cada especie en base a lo registrado en otros países. Hasta el día de la fecha no existen registros publicados de planarias terrestres, sínfilos, o diplópodos para esta área, por lo cual el presente trabajo constituye la primera contribución sobre estos grupos. Las especies mencionadas perjudican a las actividades agropecuarias y horticulturales de diversas formas. Una tarea a futuro deberá ser la cuantificación de los daños que causan para establecer su importancia y el costo/beneficio de su control o manejo.

New or poorly known exotic invertebrates from Buenos Aires City

Abstract: Exotic invertebrates in the city of Buenos Aires. First steps for the monitoring of potential biological invasions. Invasive species can cause several problems at the socio-economic level and for the biodiversity conservation. The early detection of naturalized species can be of vital importance for the planning of containment strategies of the invasion process. The flat worms (Tricladida, Geoplanoidea), land slugs (Mollusca, Limacidae), millipedes (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) and symphillids (Myriapoda, Symphyla) of the Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires it is little studied, and the addition of exotic species transported by human activities complicates the situation of little knowledge. In this work, we present new records of species of these groups that have become naturalized in the urban area of the city and its surroundings (Bipalium kewense, Austroplana sanguinea, Ambigolimax valentianus, Brachyiulus pusillus, Oxidus gracilis y Scutigerella immaculata). The invasive potential of each species was evaluated based on what was registered in other countries. Until the date there are no published records of terrestrial flat worms, symphillids, or millipedes for this area, for which the present work constitutes the first contribution on these groups. The aforementioned species damage agricultural and horticultural activities in different ways. A future task should be the quantification of the damage caused to establish its importance and the cost / benefit of its control or management.

10aCiudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires10aDiplopoda10aGeoplanoidea10aLimacidae10aSymphyla1 aAgnolin, Federico1 aAgnolin, Agustín1 aGuerrero, Elián, L. uhttp://www.lillo.org.ar/journals/index.php/acta-zoologica-lilloana/article/view/v63n2a0405173nas a2200253 4500008004100000022001400041245015800055210007000213260001500283300001000298490000700308520427100315653002204586653003704608653002504645653002804670653001604698653002104714100002204735700002204757700002504779700002204804856009304826 2020 eng d a1852-609800aInvertebrados exóticos nuevos o poco conocidos (Tricladida, Gastropoda, Diplopoda, Symphyla, Isopoda, Arachnida) en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina0 aInvertebrados exóticos nuevos o poco conocidos Tricladida Gastro c19/05/2020 a13-290 v643 a

Resumen: La fauna de planarias terrestres (Tricladida, Geoplanoidea), babosas (Mollusca, Gastropoda), diplópodos (Myriapoda, Diplopoda), sínfilos (Myriapoda, Symphylla) y arácnidos (Chelicerata) de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (CABA, Argentina) permanece pobremente conocida. En la presente contribución se dan a conocer nuevos registros de especies de estos grupos, naturalizadas en el ámbito urbano de CABA y alrededores. Las colectas y observaciones fueron realizadas sin un método sistemático. Se reportan: Rhynchodemus sylvaticus (Tricladida, Geoplanidas; primer registro para la provincia de Buenos Aires y segundo para Argentina), Obama nungara (Tricladida, Geoplanidae; primera cita para CABA), Imbira flavonigra (Tricladida, Geoplanidae; primer registro para Argentina), Milax gagates (Mollusca, Milacidae; primer registro para CABA), Cylindroiulus latestriatus (Diplopoda, Julidae; primer registro para Argentina), Ophyiulus pilosus (Diplopoda, Julidae; primer registro para Argentina), Brachydesmus superus (Diplopoda, Paradoxomatidae; primer registro para CABA y segundo para Argentina), Symphylella vulgaris (Symphyla, Scolopendrellidae; primer registro para Argentina), Cylisticus convexus (Oniscidea, Cylisticidae; segunda cita para Argentina, luego de 90 años), Uloborus plumipes (Arachnida, Uloboridae; segunda cita para CABA y para Argentina) y Leucauge argyra (Arachnida, Tetragnathidae; primera cita para la provincia de Buenos Aires y segunda cita para Argentina). Diversos autores indican para Europa un rápido incremento en el número de especies invertebradas introducidas, un patrón extrapolable a Argentina. Lamentablemente, hasta la fecha, no se cuenta con datos certeros acerca de los patrones de distribución o abundancia de estas especies. En este sentido es necesario priorizar su conocimiento, incluso de aquellas potencialmente perjudiciales para ambientes nativos.

New or Little Known Exotic Invertebrates (Tricladida, Gastropoda, Diplopoda, Symphyla, Isopoda, Arachnida) in Buenos Aires City, Argentina

Abstract: The terrestrial flatworm (Tricladida, Geoplanoidea), slug (Mollusca, Gastropoda), diplopodan (Myriapoda, Diplopoda), symphilan (Myriapoda, Symphyla) and spider (Chelicerata) faunas of Buenos Aires City (CABA, Argentina) are poorly known. The aim of the present contribution is to report new records of exotic species belonging to those clades. Collection and observation of specimens were made without a systematic method. The following species are reported: Rhynchodemus sylvaticus (Tricladida, Geoplanidae; first record for Buenos Aires province and second record for tArgentina), Obama nungara (Tricladida, Geoplanidae; CABA), Imbira flavonigra (Tricladida, Geoplanidae; first record for Argentina), Milax gagates (Mollusca, Milacidae; first record for CABA), Cylindroiulus latestriatus (Diplopoda, Julidae; first record for Argentina), Ophyiulus pilosus (Diplopoda, Julidae; first record for Argentina), Brachydesmus superus (Diplopoda, Paradoxomatidae; first record for CABA and second record for Argentina), Symphylella vulgaris (Symphyla, Scolopendrellidae; first record for Argentina), Cylisticus convexus (Oniscidea, Cylisticidae; second record for the city by most than 90 years), Uloborus plumipes (Arachnida, Uloboridae; second record for CABA and the country), and Leucauge argyra (Arachnida, Tetragnathidae; first record for Buenos Aires province and second record for Argentina). Several authors have indicated that the number of exotic invertebrates in European cities has been dramatically increased in the last years. This pattern should be extrapolated to Argentina. Unfortunately, up to the date we entirely lack information about dispersal and distribution of exotic invertebrates in the city. It is necessary to prioritize the study of exotic species, especially those that are potentially problematic for native environments.

10aBuenos Aires City10aCiudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires10aexotic invertebrates10ainvertebrados exóticos10anew records10anuevos registros1 aAgnolin, Federico1 aAgnolin, Agustín1 aGarcia-Marsà, Jordi1 aOlejnik, Nicolás uhttp://www.lillo.org.ar/journals/index.php/acta-zoologica-lilloana/article/view/v64n1a0201808nam a2200277 4500008004100000020002200041245008400063210006900147260001400216300001700230520102600247653002201273653001701295653002701312653002301339653001201362653000901374653001901383653003401402100000801436700000901444700000901453700000901462700000701471856005201478 2020 eng d a978-92-5-133582-600aState of knowledge of soil biodiversity - Status, challenges and potentialities0 aState of knowledge of soil biodiversity Status challenges and po aRomebFAO axxviii + 5853 a

There is increasing attention to the importance of biodiversity for food security and nutrition, especially above-ground biodiversity such as plants and animals. However, less attention is being paid to the biodiversity beneath our feet, soil biodiversity, which drives many processes that produce food or purify soil and water. This report is the result of an inclusive process involving more than 300 scientists from around the world under the auspices of the FAO’s Global Soil Partnership and its Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils, the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Global Soil Biodiversity Initiative, and the European Commission. It presents concisely the state of knowledge on soil biodiversity, the threats to it, and the solutions that soil biodiversity can provide to problems in different fields. It also represents a valuable contribution to raising awareness of the importance of soil biodiversity and highlighting its role in finding solutions to today's global threats.

10aawareness raising10abiodiversity10aecosystem conservation10aecosystem services10areports10asoil10asoil organisms10aSustainable Development Goals1 aFAO1 aITPS1 aGSBI1 aSCBD1 aEC uhttp://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cb1928en01302nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001500214300001000229490000700239520063800246653001000884653001400894653001700908653001100925653002300936653001600959100002700975700002201002856004801024 2020 eng d a1768-144800aTerrestrial invertebrate fauna of Polish caves – a summary of 100 years of research0 aTerrestrial invertebrate fauna of Polish caves a summary of 100  c13/02/2020 a45-690 v333 a

The year 2018 is particularly important in the history of zoological research in Poland. A hundred years ago, Kazimierz Demel published the first work concerning the terrestrial cave fauna of caves in the Ojców area. In this paper we present the extent of research on the terrestrial invertebrate fauna of Polish caves in the last 100 years. All accessible research papers that have been published during this period were analysed. Based on published literature, 593 species of terrestrial invertebrate were recorded in Polish caves. Additionally, detailed list of species of individual taxonomic groups was provided.

10acaves10achecklist10ainvertebrate10aPoland10asubterranean fauna10aterrestrial1 aKocot-Zalewska, Joanna1 aDomagała, Paweł uhttps://subtbiol.pensoft.net/article/48805/01924nas a2200217 4500008004100000245012000041210006900161260001200230300001400242490000700256520127800263653001401541653001501555653001401570653001101584653001201595653001301607100002001620700001701640856004901657 2018 eng d00aChecklist of the Myriapoda in Cretaceous Burmese amber and a correction of the Myriapoda identified by Zhang (2017)0 aChecklist of the Myriapoda in Cretaceous Burmese amber and a cor c12/2020 a1131-11400 v143 a

An inventory of the Myriapoda (Diplopoda, Chilopoda, Symphyla) from Cretaceous Burmese amber, Myanmar, is presented, including the oldest and/or first fossil record for numerous orders. For millipedes (Diplopoda) 527 records, including 460 new specimens determined by us, belonging to 13 of 16 recent orders are listed: Polyxenida, Glomeridesmida, Glomerida, Siphonophorida, Polyzoniida, Platydesmida, Siphoniulida, Chordeumatida, Polydesmida, Stemmiulida, Callipodida, Spirostreptida and Spirobolida. For centipedes, 33 records for 4 of the 5 recent orders are listed: Scutigeromorpha, Lithobiomorpha, Scolopendromorpha and Geophilomorpha. For Symphyla, three records for both families, Scutigerellidae and Scolopendrellidae, are listed. The majority of Diplopoda records (30.5%) are Polydesmida. The record of the Polyzoniida includes first instar octopod juveniles. The checklist includes the first fossil representatives known of the Platydesmida, as well as the oldest known fossils of the Polyxenida, Glomeridesmida, Glomerida, Siphonophorida, Polyzoniida, Siphoniulida, Spirostreptida, as well as both Symphyla families. Misidentifications by Zhang (2017) are corrected; while most Chilopoda in that list are correct, almost all Diplopoda are misidentified.

10aChilopoda10aCretaceous10aDiplopoda10afossil10aMyanmar10aSymphyla1 aWesener, Thomas1 aMoritz, Leif uhttps://checklist.pensoft.net/article/30320/03914nas a2200505 4500008004100000022001400041245012800055210006900183260001500252300000900267490000700276520241600283653002402699653001302723653002302736653002102759653001802780653001802798653002102816653001202837653001902849100002702868700002002895700002202915700002102937700002202958700001802980700001702998700001703015700001803032700002303050700002003073700002303093700002403116700001803140700002403158700002803182700002703210700001903237700002003256700001403276700001903290700002103309856007803330 2020 eng d a1471-214800aFour myriapod relatives – but who are sisters? No end to debates on relationships among the four major myriapod subgroups0 aFour myriapod relatives but who are sisters No end to debates on c04/11/2020 a1-150 v203 a

Background: Phylogenetic relationships among the myriapod subgroups Chilopoda, Diplopoda, Symphyla and Pauropoda are still not robustly resolved. The first phylogenomic study covering all subgroups resolved phylogenetic relationships congruently to morphological evidence but is in conflict with most previously published phylogenetic trees based on diverse molecular data. Outgroup choice and long-branch attraction effects were stated as possible explanations for these incongruencies. In this study, we addressed these issues by extending the myriapod and outgroup taxon sampling using transcriptome data.

Results: We generated new transcriptome data of 42 panarthropod species, including all four myriapod subgroups and additional outgroup taxa. Our taxon sampling was complemented by published transcriptome and genome data resulting in a supermatrix covering 59 species. We compiled two data sets, the first with a full coverage of genes per species (292 single-copy protein-coding genes), the second with a less stringent coverage (988 genes). We inferred phylogenetic relationships among myriapods using different data types, tree inference, and quartet computation approaches. Our results unambiguously support monophyletic Mandibulata and Myriapoda. Our analyses clearly showed that there is strong signal for a single unrooted topology, but a sensitivity of the position of the internal root on the choice of outgroups. However, we observe strong evidence for a clade Pauropoda+Symphyla, as well as for a clade Chilopoda+Diplopoda.

Conclusions: Our best quartet topology is incongruent with current morphological phylogenies which were supported in another phylogenomic study. AU tests and quartet mapping reject the quartet topology congruent to trees inferred with morphological characters. Moreover, quartet mapping shows that confounding signal present in the data set is sufficient to explain the weak signal for the quartet topology derived from morphological characters. Although outgroup choice affects results, our study could narrow possible trees to derivatives of a single quartet topology. For highly disputed relationships, we propose to apply a series of tests (AU and quartet mapping), since results of such tests allow to narrow down possible relationships and to rule out confounding signal.

 

10aArthropod phylogeny10aconflict10aConfounding signal10aInternal rooting10aPhylogenetics10aphylogenomics10aQuartet topology10aRNA-Seq10aTranscriptomes1 aSzucsich, Nikolaus, U.1 aBartel, Daniela1 aBlanke, Alexander1 aBöhm, Alexander1 aDonath, Alexander1 aFukui, Makiko1 aGrove, Simon1 aLiu, Shanlin1 aMacek, Oliver1 aMachida, Ryuichiro1 aMisof, Bernhard1 aNakagaki, Yasutaka1 aPodsiadlowski, Lars1 aSekiya, Kaoru1 aTomizuka, Shigekazu1 aVon Reumont, Björn, M.1 aWaterhouse, Robert, M.1 aWalzl, Manfred1 aMeng, Guanliang1 aZhou, Xin1 aPass, Günther1 aMeusemann, Karen uhttps://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-020-01699-003060nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245010900055210006900164260001500233300001200248490000800260520235000268653001402618653001402632653000802646653001402654653002302668100002202691700002002713700002102733700001702754856004702771 2020 eng d a1313-298900aSubterranean biodiversity and depth distribution of myriapods in forested scree slopes of Central Europe0 aSubterranean biodiversity and depth distribution of myriapods in c28/04/2020 a117-1370 v9303 a

The shallow underground of rock debris is a unique animal refuge. Nevertheless, the research of this habitat lags far behind the study of caves and soil, due to technical and time-consuming demands. Data on Myriapoda in scree habitat from eleven localities in seven different geomorphological units of the Czech and Slovak Republics were processed. Based on previous studies, as well as knowledge of cave and soil fauna, it was hypothesised that the occurrence of a varied and peculiar fauna would show a pattern of depth distribution with variations due to local specificities. From 2005–2016 (at least one year on each site), macrofauna was collected via sets of three long-term exposed subterranean traps consisting of 110 cm long perforated tube, with ten cups located in a gradient at 5–95 cm below the soil surface. In total, 14 symphylans (not identified to species level), 271 centipedes (23 spp.) and 572 millipedes (32 spp.) were sampled. The overall depth distribution of centipedes and millipedes appeared to have relatively similar pattern, with both groups being found at all depth levels. Nevertheless, this pattern depends on locations. The depth distribution trend lines are mostly in the form of an asymmetric ‘U’, with decreased abundance until the middle of the gradient, followed by increase in the deepest levels. Epigeic species were sporadically distributed along the whole depth gradient, but concentrated at the soil surface, while some subterranean species, such as the centipede Lithobius lucifugus and the millipedes Geoglomeris subterranea, Cibiniulus slovacus and Archiboreoiulus pallidus, were recorded in the deepest parts of the gradient. This characterises the debris community as a mixture of soil and subterranean species with an absence of species exclusively found in caves. The use of different fixation methods in traps had a significant and selective impact on samples; millipedes were either attracted by ethylene glycol or repelled by formaldehyde. Centipedes were also captured more frequently in ethylene glycol; however, the species composition varied in each of the fixatives. Depth distribution of myriapods was similar in both fixative solutions. Traps with these fixatives could be recommended for similar ecological studies.

10aChilopoda10aDiplopoda10aMSS10aMyriapoda10asubterranean traps1 aHaľková, Beáta1 aTuf, Ivan, Hán1 aTajovský, Karel1 aMock, Andrej uhttps://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/48914/