01547nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245009800055210006900153260001500222300001000237490000700247520069000254653001400944653002900958653001400987653002201001653002401023653002401047653001701071653001301088100000901101856019501110 2020 eng d a2057-057000aOpinion 2450: Geophilus alpinus Meinert, 1870 (Chilopoda): specific name not conserved0 aOpinion 2450 iGeophilus alpinusi Meinert 1870 Chilopoda specific c30/04/2020 a55-560 v773 a

The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has declined to use its plenary power to conserve the specific name of Geophilus alpinus Meinert, 1870 for a European species of geophilomorph centipede. As a result, the name impressus C.L. Koch, 1847 as published in the binomen Geophilus impressus has priority over the names palustris C.L. Koch, 1863, as published in the binomen Geophilus palustris and alpinus Meinert, 1870, as published in the binomen Geophilus alpinus whenever the former is considered synonymous with either of the latter.

10aChilopoda10ageophilomorph centipedes10aGeophilus10aGeophilus alpinus10aGeophilus impressus10aGeophilus palustris10anomenclature10aTaxonomy1 aICZN uhttps://bioone.org/journals/the-bulletin-of-zoological-nomenclature/volume-77/issue-1/bzn.v77.a016/Opinion-2450-Case-3673--Geophilus-alpinus-Meinert-1870-Chilopoda/10.21805/bzn.v77.a016.full01396nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245011000055210006900165260001200234490000700246520049400253653001400747653002900761653001400790653002200804653002400826653002400850653001700874653001300891100001800904700002400922856020800946 2015 eng d a2057-057000aCase 3673: Geophilus alpinus Meinert, 1870 (Chilopoda): proposed conservation of the specific name0 aCase 3673 iGeophilus alpinusi Meinert 1870 Chilopoda proposed co c03/20150 v723 a

The purpose of this application, under Article 23.9.3 of the Code, is to conserve the specific name Geophilus alpinus Meinert, 1870 for a widespread European species of geophilomorph centipedes. This name, currently in use, is threatened by the subjective synonyms Geophilus impressus C.L. Koch, 1847 and Geophilus palustris C.L. Koch, 1863, which have been disregarded since 1874 and 1882 respectively.

10aChilopoda10ageophilomorph centipedes10aGeophilus10aGeophilus alpinus10aGeophilus impressus10aGeophilus palustris10anomenclature10aTaxonomy1 aBonato, Lucio1 aMinelli, Alessandro uhttps://bioone.org/journals/the-bulletin-of-zoological-nomenclature/volume-72/issue-1/bzn.v72i1.a10/Case-3673Geophilus-alpinus-Meinert-1870-Chilopoda--proposed-conservation-of/10.21805/bzn.v72i1.a10.full02448nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245008000055210006900135260001500204300000900219490000700228520175800235653001801993653002002011653001402031653002002045653002202065653002102087653001702108100002002125700001802145856004302163 2020 eng d a2075-445000aSoil Health and Arthropods: From Complex System to Worthwhile Investigation0 aSoil Health and Arthropods From Complex System to Worthwhile Inv c16/01/2020 a1-210 v113 a

The dramatic increase in soil degradation in the last few decades has led to the need to identify methods to define not only soil quality but also, in a holistic approach, soil health. In the past twenty years, indices based on living communities have been proposed alongside the already proven physical-chemical methods. Among them, some soil invertebrates have been included in monitoring programs as bioindicators of soil quality. Being an important portion of soil fauna, soil arthropods are involved in many soil processes such as organic matter decomposition and translocation, nutrient cycling, microflora activity regulation and bioturbation. Many studies have reported the use of soil arthropods to define soil quality; among taxa, some have been explored more in depth, typically Acari and Collembola, while generally less abundant groups, such as Palpigradi or Embioptera, have not been investigated much. This paper aims to evaluate and compare the use of different soil microarthropod taxa in soil degradation/quality studies to highlight which groups are the most reported for soil monitoring and which are the most sensitive to soil degradation. We have decided not to include the two most present and abundant taxa, Acari and Collembola, in this paper in consideration of the vast amount of existing literature and focus the discussion on the other microarthropod groups. We reported some studies for each taxon highlighting the use of the group as soil quality indicator. A brief section reporting some indices based on soil microarthropods is proposed at the end of this specific discussion. This paper can be considered as a reference point in the use of soil arthropods to estimate soil quality and health.

10abioindicators10amacroarthropods10amesofauna10amicroarthropods10asoil biodiversity10asoil degradation10asoil quality1 aMenta, Cristina1 aRemelli, Sara uhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/11/1/5404196nas a2200253 4500008004100000245011700041210007300158260007100231300000700302490001300309520340800322653001403730653001603744653001803760653001003778653000903788653001103797653001003808653001403818653001403832653001403846100002203860856006003882 2020 eng d00aKterý způsob managementu polomu vyhovuje stonožkám? - Which windthrow management is suitable for centipedes?0 aKterý způsob managementu polomu vyhovuje stonožkám Which windthr aOlomoucbUP v Olomouci - Palacky University of Olomoucc28/01/2020 a350 vbachelor3 a

Větrné disturbance hrají významnou roli ve vývojovém cyklu horského smrkového lesa. Plošné odstranění zapojeného korunového patra otevírá prostor pro nová společenstva a společně s lýkožroutem smrkovým je podle posledních studií klíčovým prvkem obnovy horské smrčiny. Větrné disturbance však ovlivňují i hospodářské smrkové lesy, kde je většinou tendence padlé dřevo zpracovat pro ekonomický zisk a jako prevenci vůči požárům a kůrovcové kalamitě. Takový zásah vichřice má přirozený dopad i na půdní faunu. Tato práce se zabývá dopadem vichřice na společenstva stonožek ve Vysokých a Západních Tatrách a snaží se zodpovědět otázku, jaký následný management polomu ve smrkovém lese stonožkám více vyhovuje. Pro odběry byly stanoveny referenční plochy a plochy s odlišným managementem polomu, které byli primárně sledovány mezi roky 2007 až 2009. Pro odběr materiálu byly použity půdní vzorky, pro sledování epigeické aktivity stonožek byly na lokalitách umístěny padací zemní pasti. Celkově bylo determinováno 2535 jedinců, zaznamenáno bylo 14 druhů. Ze získaných dat lze usoudit, že bezzásahový management měl 5 let po vichřici pozitivnější vliv na abundance stonožek oproti asanačnímu managementu na sledovaných plochách.

Vaverka M. (2020): Which windthrow management is suitable for centipedes? [bachelor’s thesis]. Olomouc: Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Palacky University of Olomouc. 35 pp. 2 Appendices. In Czech.

English Abstract:
Wind disturbances play an important role in the development cycle of mountain spruce forest.
Complete removal of the tree canopy open space for new communities and together with spruce bark beetle, according to the current studies, are a key element in development cycle of mountain spruce forest. However, windstorms also affect economic spruce forests, where is usually a tendency to remove fallen timber for economic gain and for the prevention of fire and bark beetle calamity. Naturally, windthrow has an important impact on the soil fauna. This work deals with impact of windstorm on centipede communities in High and West Tatra Mts. with an interest to explain, which windthrow management in spruce forest is more suitable for centipedes. Reference areas and areas with different management were established for the sampling primarily in the years 2007 to 2009. Heat extraction of soil samples was used for evaluation of abundances and pitfall traps for evaluation of epigeic activity of centipedes. Totally, 2535 individuals of 14 species were identified. The collected data can be partially concluded that non-intervention management had positive influence on the abundance of centipedes 5 years after the windstorm, compared with timber-removed stands.

10aChilopoda10adisturbance10aNorway spruce10apolom10asmrk10aTatras10aTatry10avichřice10awindstorm10awindthrow1 aVaverka, Miroslav uhttp://myriapoda.upol.cz/tuf/pdf/papers/Vaverka2020.pdf