02439nas a2200133 4500008004100000022004600041245004300087210003900130260006400169300001200233520200200245100001902247856003902266 2019 eng d a978-952-11-4973-3, ISBN 978-952-11-4974-000aTuhatjalkaiset - Myriapods - Myriapoda0 aTuhatjalkaiset Myriapods Myriapoda aHelsinkibYmpäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus a340-3433 a

Viittausohje, kun viitataan yksittäiseen Punaisen listan lukuun: Vahtera, V. 2019. Tuhatjalkaiset. Julk.: Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. (toim.) 2019. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus – Punainen kirja 2019. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus. Helsinki. S. 340-343. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Reference of a separate chapter of the Red List: Vahtera, V. 2019. Myriapods. In: Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. (eds.) 2019. The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species. Ministry of the Environment & Finnish Environment Institute. Helsinki. P. 340-343. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Summary: Myriapoda are a diverse group of terrestrial arthropods, some of which are herbivores, some predators and some decomposers. There are four classes of Myriapoda: centipedes (Chilopoda), millipedes (Diplopoda), pauropods (Pauropoda), and symphylans (Symphyla). In Finland, a total of 63 species have been found: 21 centipede, 28 millipede, eight pauropod, and six symphylan species. In total, there are ten red-listed species: the critically endangered (CR) Geophilus carpophagus, which was classified as Regionally Extinct (RE) in the two previous assessments, and the Near Threatened (NT) species G. electricus, G. truncorum and Julus scanicus. These species only have one known locality each, and no new observations have been made of the three Near Threatened (NT) species for a long time. Six species have been categorised as Data Deficient (DD). Many species were classified as Not Evaluated (NE) due to insufficient information on their occurrence. While no monitoring of Myriapoda has been organised in Finland, the information on the spread of the species in this country could be updated by organising a monitoring study of a few years in duration.

1 aVahtera, Varpu uhttp://hdl.handle.net/10138/29950108893nam a2200337 4500008004100000022004600041245005500087210005100142260006400193300000800257520789800265653001508163653002808178653001708206653000908223653002108232653001908253653001308272653001408285653001908299653002208318653002308340653002208363653002608385100002108411700001808432700002108450700002208471700002308493856003908516 2019 eng d a978-952-11-4973-3, ISBN 978-952-11-4974-000aSuomen lajien uhanalaisuus – Punainen kirja 20190 aSuomen lajien uhanalaisuus Punainen kirja 2019 aHelsinkibYmpäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus a7043 a

Tiivistelmä: Julkaisussa esitellään Suomen lajien viides uhanalaisuusarviointi. Suomen lajimäärän arvioidaan nykyään olevan vähintään 48 000. Riittävät tiedot uhanalaisuusarviointiin oli 22 418 lajista tai alemmasta taksonista, mikä on noin 47 % lajistosta. Uhanalaisiksi arvioitiin 2 668 lajia tai alempaa taksonia eli noin 11,9 % arvioiduista lajeista. Punaisen listan lajeja, joihin kuuluvat uhanalaisten lisäksi hävinneet, silmälläpidettävät ja puutteellisesti tunnetut on yhteensä 6 683 (29,8 %). Arvioiduista lajeista äärimmäisen uhanalaisia (CR) on 489, erittäin uhanalaisia (EN) 918, vaarantuneita (VU) 1 260, silmälläpidettäviä (NT) 1 912, puutteellisesti tunnettuja (DD) 1 792, hävinneitä (RE) 312 ja elinvoimaisia (LC) 15 735. Arviointi tehtiin Kansainvälisen luonnonsuojeluliiton (IUCN) ohjeiden ja kriteerien mukaan. IUCN:n alueellisen uhanalaisuusarvioinnin kriteerit perustuvat lajien havaittuun, arvioituun, pääteltyyn tai ennustettuun populaatioiden pienenemiseen, levinneisyys- tai esiintymisalueen kokoon, pieneen ja jatkuvasti taantuvaan tai hyvin pieneen populaatioon tai kvantitatiiviseen analyysiin. Lisäksi Suomessa on dokumentoitu lajien elinympäristöt sekä uhanalaisuuden syyt ja uhkatekijät. Enemmistö uhanalaisista lajeista elää metsissä (31 %) sekä perinneympäristöissä ja muissa ihmisen muuttamissa ympäristöissä (24 %). Uhanalaisten osuus kunkin elinympäristön arvioiduista lajeista on korkein tunturipaljakalla (37,9 %). Uhanalaisten lajien määrä on suurin hemiboreaalisella ja eteläboreaalisella vyöhykkeellä Etelä-Suomessa. Julkaisussa vertaillaan arvioinnin tuloksia vuoden 2010 tuloksiin esimerkiksi uhanalaisuusindeksin avulla. Lisäksi julkaisussa tarkastellaan vuoden 2010 uhanalaisuusarvioinnin ohjausryhmän ehdotusten toteutumista. Arvioinnin tulosten pohjalta Eliölajien uhanalaisuuden arvioinnin ohjausryhmä (LAUHA) esittää 13 toimenpide-ehdotusta uhanalaisten lajien suojelun, hoidon, tutkimuksen ja seurannan järjestämiseksi ja rahoittamiseksi. Arvioinnit on tehty eliöryhmäkohtaisissa työryhmissä ja työn tulokset esitellään eliöryhmittäin 39 luvussa.

Viittausohje, kun viitataan koko julkaisuun: Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. (toim.) 2019. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus – Punainen kirja 2019. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus. Helsinki. 704 s. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Sammandrag: I denna bok presenteras resultat av Finlands femte hotbedömning. Finlands artantal uppskattas för tillfället till minst 48 000. Tillräckliga uppgifter för hotbedömning fanns om 22 418 arter eller lägre taxa, vilket utgör 47 % av alla arter. Av dessa bedömdes 2 667 arter eller lägre taxa vara hotade, d.v.s. 11,9 %. Rödlistade arter, som förutom hotade arter även innefattar försvunna arter, nära hotade arter och arter som det råder kunskapsbrist om, uppgår till 6 683 (29,8 %). Av de bedömda arterna är 498 akut hotade (CR), 918 starkt hotade (EN), 1 260 sårbara (VU), 1 912 nära hotade (NT), 1 792 med kunskapsbrist (DD), 312 försvunna (RE) och 15 735 livskraftiga. Hoten har bedömts på basis av Internationella Naturvårdsunionens (IUCN) regionala hotbedömningskriterier. Kriterierna grundar sig på observerad, deduktiv eller estimerad minskning av populationer eller utbrednings- och förekomstområden, en liten och kontinuerligt minskande eller en mycket liten population eller på kvantitativ analys. Därutöver har arternas livsmiljö, hotorsak och hotfaktorer i Finland dokumenterats. Majoriteten av de hotade arterna lever i skogar (31 %), vårdbiotoper och andra kulturmiljöer (24 %). Antalet hotade arter är högst inom den hemiboreala och sydboreala zonen i södra Finland. Andelen hotade arter i en specifik habitattyp är högst i kalfjället(37,9 %). I publikationen jämförs resultaten av hotbedömningen med resultaten från år 2010 t.ex. med hjälp av rödlisteindexet. Vid sidan av bedömningsresultaten beskrivs de mest påtagliga administrativa och juridiska åtgärder som vidtagits för artskydd samt forskning och övervakning sedan den föregående bedömningen. Hotbedömningens styrgrupp (LAUHA ) föreslår 13 åtgärder för organisering och finansiering av skydd, vård, forskning och övervakning av hotade arter. Resultaten av bedömningen som är genomförd av expertgrupper presenteras i 39 kapitel som omfattar olika organismgrupper.

The Red List of Finnish Species 2019

Abstract: This publication describes the fifth assessment of Finnish threatened species. The current estimated number of species in Finland is at least 48,000. Sufficient information was available for the evaluation of 22,418 species or lower taxa, which is approximately 47% of all species. In total, 2,667 species or lower taxa (11.9%) were assessed as threatened. The red-listed species, which, in addition to threatened species, include the species classified as Regionally Extinct, Near Threatened, and Data Deficient, total 6,683 (29.8%). Of the species evaluated, 489 were classified as Critically Endangered (CR), 918 as Endangered (EN), 1,260 as Vulnerable (VU), 1,912 as Near Threatened (NT), 1,792 as Data Deficient (DD), 312 as Regionally Extinct (RE), and 15,735 as of Least Concern (LC). The assessment was carried out in accordance with guidelines and criteria issued by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and applied in assessments at the regional level. These criteria are based on observed, estimated, inferred, or projected population size reduction; the extent of occurrence or area of occupancy; continuing decline in a small population or a very small size of population; or a quantitative analysis. In addition, species’ habitats, as well as causes of threat and threat factors, were documented in the Finnish evaluation. The majority of threatened species live in forests (31%) and in rural biotopes and other cultural habitats (24%). Of the species assessed the proportion of threatened species is highest in Alpine habitats (37.9%). The number of threatened species is highest in the hemiboreal and southern boreal zones in southern Finland. The results of the assessment are compared to the previous assessment 2010 for example with the Red List Index. In addition, proceedings of the proposals given by the steering group of the previous assessment are evaluated. The steering group of this assessment made 13 proposals for measures for the arrangement and financing of the conservation, management, research, and monitoring of threatened species. The results of the work of the expert groups responsible for the evaluation are presented in 39 organism group -specific sections.

Reference of the publication: Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. (eds.) 2019. The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus. Helsinki. 704 p. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Publication date: 26/02/2019

10abedömning10aconservation of species10ahotade arter10aIUCN10alajiston suojelu10apunainen lista10aRed list10arödlista10askydd av arter10athreat assessment10athreatened species10auhanalaiset lajit10auhanalaisuusarviointi1 aHyvärinen, Esko1 aJuslén, Aino1 aKemppainen, Eija1 aUddström, Annika1 aLiukko, Ulla-Maija uhttp://hdl.handle.net/10138/29950101827nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245008600055210006900141260001500210300000900225490000600234520115100240653001501391653001801406653001201424653001301436653001501449653001101464100001801475700001901493700002401512856004901536 2014 eng d a1314-282800aMillipedes and centipedes in German greenhouses (Myriapoda: Diplopoda, Chilopoda)0 aMillipedes and centipedes in German greenhouses Myriapoda Diplop c11/04/2014 a1-430 v23 a

A review is given of all the literature records of millipedes and centipedes that have been found in German greenhouses together with additional records for 29 such sites. Species lists are given for 46 greenhouses investigated throughout Germany. Thirty-five diplopod and 18 chilopod species were found to occur in greenhouses, of which 15 (3 Chilopoda, 12 Diplopoda) are restricted to this type of habitat. First records for Germany include Anadenobolus monilicornis (Porat, 1876), Epinannolene cf. trinidadensis Chamberlin, 1918, Epinannolene sp., Mesoiulus gridellii Strasser, 1934, Leptogoniulus sorornus (Butler, 1876), Rhinotus purpureus (Pocock, 1894), Cryptops doriae Pocock, 1891, Lamyctes coeculus (Brölemann, 1889) and Tygarrup javanicus (Attems, 1907). The millipedes Oxidus gracilis (C. L. Koch, 1847) and Amphitomeus attemsi (Schubart, 1934) and the centipedes Lithobius forficatus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Cryptops hortensis (Donovan, 1810) are the species most frequently found in greenhouses.

10acentipedes10afirst records10aGermany10ahothouse10amillipedes10areview1 aDecker, Peter1 aReip, Hans, S.1 aVoigtländer, Karin uhttps://bdj.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=106604216nas a2200565 4500008004100000022001400041245011200055210006900167260001500236300001400251490000700265520256200272653001602834653002402850653001902874653002202893653001602915653001302931653001502944653001802959653002002977653001902997100002303016700002503039700002103064700002103085700002503106700002303131700002503154700003003179700002203209700002803231700002103259700001703280700002503297700002703322700001803349700002203367700002403389700002003413700001503433700002203448700002503470700001903495700001903514700001803533700002303551700001803574856005803592 2022 eng d a1464-793100aFeeding habits and multifunctional classification of soil-associated consumers from protists to vertebrates0 aFeeding habits and multifunctional classification of soilassocia c20/01/2022 a1057-11170 v973 a

Soil organisms drive major ecosystem functions by mineralising carbon and releasing nutrients during decomposition processes, which supports plant growth, aboveground biodiversity and, ultimately, human nutrition. Soil ecologists often operate with functional groups to infer the effects of individual taxa on ecosystem functions and services. Simultaneous assessment of the functional roles of multiple taxa is possible using food-web reconstructions, but our knowledge of the feeding habits of many taxa is insufficient and often based on limited evidence. Over the last two decades, molecular, biochemical and isotopic tools have improved our understanding of the feeding habits of various soil organisms, yet this knowledge is still to be synthesised into a common functional framework. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the feeding habits of consumers in soil, including protists, micro-, meso- and macrofauna (invertebrates), and soil-associated vertebrates. We have integrated existing functional group classifications with findings gained with novel methods and compiled an overarching classification across taxa focusing on key universal traits such as food resource preferences, body masses, microhabitat specialisation, protection and hunting mechanisms. Our summary highlights various strands of evidence that many functional groups commonly used in soil ecology and food-web models are feeding on multiple types of food resources. In many cases, omnivory is observed down to the species level of taxonomic resolution, challenging realism of traditional soil food-web models based on distinct resource-based energy channels. Novel methods, such as stable isotope, fatty acid and DNA gut content analyses, have revealed previously hidden facets of trophic relationships of soil consumers, such as food assimilation, multichannel feeding across trophic levels, hidden trophic niche differentiation and the importance of alternative food/prey, as well as energy transfers across ecosystem compartments. Wider adoption of such tools and the development of open interoperable platforms that assemble morphological, ecological and trophic data as traits of soil taxa will enable the refinement and expansion of the multifunctional classification of consumers in soil. The compiled multifunctional classification of soil-associated consumers will serve as a reference for ecologists working with biodiversity changes and biodiversity?ecosystem functioning relationships, making soil food-web research more accessible and reproducible.

10afatty acids10afeeding preferences10afood resources10afunctional traits10agut content10aomnivory10aSoil fauna10asoil food web10astable isotopes10atrophic guilds1 aPotapov, Anton, M.1 aBeaulieu, Frédéric1 aBirkhofer, Klaus1 aBluhm, Sarah, L.1 aDegtyarev, Maxim, I.1 aDevetter, Miloslav1 aGoncharov, Anton, A.1 aGongalsky, Konstantin, B.1 aKlarner, Bernhard1 aKorobushkin, Daniil, I.1 aLiebke, Dana, F.1 aMaraun, Mark1 aDonnell, Rory, J. Mc1 aPollierer, Melanie, M.1 aSchaefer, Ina1 aShrubovych, Julia1 aSemenyuk, Irina, I.1 aSendra, Alberto1 aTuma, Jiri1 aTůmová, Michala1 aVassilieva, Anna, B.1 aChen, Ting-Wen1 aGeisen, Stefan1 aSchmidt, Olaf1 aTiunov, Alexei, V.1 aScheu, Stefan uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.12832