01004nas a2200121 4500008004100000245010500041210007300146260003700219300001200256520042300268100002800691856016300719 2002 eng d00aArácnidos y miriápodos: alacranes, arañas, ciempiés y otros parientes artrópodos poco conocidos0 aArácnidos y miriápodos alacranes arañas ciempiés y otros parient aCuliacánbEl Colegio de Sinaloa a211-2193 a

Recommended citation: Sánchez-Vargas, D. A. (2002): Arácnidos y miriápodos: alacranes, arañas, ciempiés y otros parientes artrópodos poco conocidos. Pp. 211-219. In: Cifuentes-Lemus, J. L., Gaxiola-López, J. (Eds.). Atlas de la biodiversidad de Sinaloa. México: El Colegio de Sinaloa.

Publication date: 10/2002.

1 aSánchez-Vargas, D., A. uhttps://myriatrix.myspecies.info/content/ar%C3%A1cnidos-y-miri%C3%A1podos-alacranes-ara%C3%B1as-ciempi%C3%A9s-y-otros-parientes-artr%C3%B3podos-poco-conocidos00510nas a2200133 4500008004100000245002600041210002100067260001500088300001200103490000700115520016800122100002600290856006000316 1895 eng d00aGenre Latzelia0 aGenre iLatzeliai c02/12/1895 a458-4590 v183 a

Brölemann, H. W. (1895): Genre Latzelia. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 18 (490): 458-459. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/9728801

1 aBrölemann, Henry, W. uhttps://myriatrix.myspecies.info/content/genre-latzelia04216nas a2200565 4500008004100000022001400041245011200055210006900167260001500236300001400251490000700265520256200272653001602834653002402850653001902874653002202893653001602915653001302931653001502944653001802959653002002977653001902997100002303016700002503039700002103064700002103085700002503106700002303131700002503154700003003179700002203209700002803231700002103259700001703280700002503297700002703322700001803349700002203367700002403389700002003413700001503433700002203448700002503470700001903495700001903514700001803533700002303551700001803574856005803592 2022 eng d a1464-793100aFeeding habits and multifunctional classification of soil-associated consumers from protists to vertebrates0 aFeeding habits and multifunctional classification of soilassocia c20/01/2022 a1057-11170 v973 a

Soil organisms drive major ecosystem functions by mineralising carbon and releasing nutrients during decomposition processes, which supports plant growth, aboveground biodiversity and, ultimately, human nutrition. Soil ecologists often operate with functional groups to infer the effects of individual taxa on ecosystem functions and services. Simultaneous assessment of the functional roles of multiple taxa is possible using food-web reconstructions, but our knowledge of the feeding habits of many taxa is insufficient and often based on limited evidence. Over the last two decades, molecular, biochemical and isotopic tools have improved our understanding of the feeding habits of various soil organisms, yet this knowledge is still to be synthesised into a common functional framework. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the feeding habits of consumers in soil, including protists, micro-, meso- and macrofauna (invertebrates), and soil-associated vertebrates. We have integrated existing functional group classifications with findings gained with novel methods and compiled an overarching classification across taxa focusing on key universal traits such as food resource preferences, body masses, microhabitat specialisation, protection and hunting mechanisms. Our summary highlights various strands of evidence that many functional groups commonly used in soil ecology and food-web models are feeding on multiple types of food resources. In many cases, omnivory is observed down to the species level of taxonomic resolution, challenging realism of traditional soil food-web models based on distinct resource-based energy channels. Novel methods, such as stable isotope, fatty acid and DNA gut content analyses, have revealed previously hidden facets of trophic relationships of soil consumers, such as food assimilation, multichannel feeding across trophic levels, hidden trophic niche differentiation and the importance of alternative food/prey, as well as energy transfers across ecosystem compartments. Wider adoption of such tools and the development of open interoperable platforms that assemble morphological, ecological and trophic data as traits of soil taxa will enable the refinement and expansion of the multifunctional classification of consumers in soil. The compiled multifunctional classification of soil-associated consumers will serve as a reference for ecologists working with biodiversity changes and biodiversity?ecosystem functioning relationships, making soil food-web research more accessible and reproducible.

10afatty acids10afeeding preferences10afood resources10afunctional traits10agut content10aomnivory10aSoil fauna10asoil food web10astable isotopes10atrophic guilds1 aPotapov, Anton, M.1 aBeaulieu, Frédéric1 aBirkhofer, Klaus1 aBluhm, Sarah, L.1 aDegtyarev, Maxim, I.1 aDevetter, Miloslav1 aGoncharov, Anton, A.1 aGongalsky, Konstantin, B.1 aKlarner, Bernhard1 aKorobushkin, Daniil, I.1 aLiebke, Dana, F.1 aMaraun, Mark1 aDonnell, Rory, J. Mc1 aPollierer, Melanie, M.1 aSchaefer, Ina1 aShrubovych, Julia1 aSemenyuk, Irina, I.1 aSendra, Alberto1 aTuma, Jiri1 aTůmová, Michala1 aVassilieva, Anna, B.1 aChen, Ting-Wen1 aGeisen, Stefan1 aSchmidt, Olaf1 aTiunov, Alexei, V.1 aScheu, Stefan uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.1283201550nas a2200145 4500008004100000022001400041245009200055210006900147260001500216300001000231490000700241520102500248100002401273856010701297 2020 eng d a2513-944400aMyriapod Trivia - Curiosities of British Natural History & The Rabbit and the Centipede0 aMyriapod Trivia Curiosities of British Natural History The Rabbi c03/04/2020 a95-970 v323 a

Over the years with an interest in the more formal study of myriapods, especially centipedes, I have also accumulated a few items of what we might call "trivia" - prints, pictures etc. The two items here come into that category and I know there are many more like them around and they are offered as light relief for Bulletin readers. I know little about The Penny Magazine but it clearly represents a cheap, presumably weekly, publication dedicated to that great Victorian aim of "self improvement". This issue comprises eight pages with items as varied as "Essays on the lives of Remarkable Painters No.XXXI: Andrea del Sarto", "The English and Irish Ordnance Surveys" and "The Hareem of Ibrahim Pasha". I have abridged the item on Centipedes and Millipedes from the original three pages. "The Rabbit and the Centipede" comes from a children's book of 1907. I am not sure that it sheds any particular new light on myriapod locomotory mechanisms.

1 aBarber, Anthony, D. uhttps://www.bmig.org.uk/sites/www.bmig.org.uk/files/bulletin/BullBMIG32(2020)95-97_Myriapod-Trivia.pdf01475nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245005200055210005200107260001500159300000900174490000700183520087700190653001701067653002001084653001901104653001601123653001701139100001601156700001501172700001401187856004401201 2020 eng d a2072-665100aCentipede Venom Peptides Acting on Ion Channels0 aCentipede Venom Peptides Acting on Ion Channels c05/04/2020 a1-180 v123 a

Centipedes are among the oldest venomous arthropods that use their venom to subdue the prey. The major components of centipede venom are a variety of low-molecular-weight peptide toxins that have evolved to target voltage-gated ion channels to interfere with the central system of prey and produce pain or paralysis for efficient hunting. Peptide toxins usually contain several intramolecular disulfide bonds, which confer chemical, thermal and biological stability. In addition, centipede peptides generally have novel structures and high potency and specificity and therefore hold great promise both as diagnostic tools and in the treatment of human disease. Here, we review the centipede peptide toxins with reported effects on ion channels, including Nav, Kv, Cav and the nonselective cation channel polymodal transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1).

10aanimal toxin10acentipede venom10adrug discovery10aion channel10apeptide drug1 aChu, YanYan1 aQiu, PeiJu1 aYu, RiLei uhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/12/4/23000469nas a2200145 4500008004100000022001400041245005600055210005600111260001200167300000900179100002200188700003100210700002800241856005400269 1989 eng d a1021-029600aCatálogo de los artrópodos terrestres no insectos0 aCatálogo de los artrópodos terrestres no insectos c03/1989 a1-551 aMaes, Jean-Michel1 aPalacios-Vargas, José, G.1 aJiménez, María, Luisa uhttp://www.bio-nica.info/RevNicaEntomo/7-full.pdf02427nas a2200349 4500008004100000022001400041245007200055210006900127260001500196300000900211490000600220520142900226653001201655653001501667653003201682653001501714653002201729653002001751653001401771653001601785653002301801653001801824100001801842700002901860700002201889700002601911700002001937700002601957700002701983700002402010856004302034 2020 eng d a1314-283600aArthropod diversity in two Historic Gardens in the Azores, Portugal0 aArthropod diversity in two Historic Gardens in the Azores Portug c06/08/2020 a1-270 v83 a

The aim of our study was to characterise and compare the richness and composition of endemic, native (non-endemic) and introduced arthropod assemblages of two Azorean Historic Gardens with contrasting plant species composition. We hypothesised that Faial Botanic Garden would hold higher arthropod diversity and abundance of native and endemic arthropod species due to its larger native plant community. Species were collected using several arthropod standardised techniques between April 2017 and June 2018. We used the alpha diversity metrics (Hill series) and the partitioning of total beta diversity (βtotal) into its replacement (βrepl) and richness (βrich) components, to analyse the adult and total arthropod community. The orders Araneae, Coleoptera and Hemiptera were also studied separately. Our results show that the number of exotic arthropod species exceeds the number of native and/or the endemic species in both gardens, but the arthropod community of Faial Botanic Garden exhibited a higher density of endemic and native species. Despite some minor exceptions, the geographic origins of plant communities largely influenced the arthropod species sampled in each garden. This study improves our knowledge about urban arthropod diversity in the Azores and shows how well-designed urban garden management and planning contribute to the conservation of native and endemic Azorean species.

10aAraneae10aArthropods10abeta diversity partitioning10aColeoptera10adiversity metrics10aendemic species10aHemiptera10aHill series10aintroduced species10aurban gardens1 aArteaga, Alba1 aMalumbres-Olarte, Jagoba1 aGabriel, Rosalina1 aRos-Prieto, Alejandra1 aCasimiro, Pedro1 aSanchez, Ana, Fuentes1 aAlbergaria, Isabel, S.1 aBorges, Paulo, A.V. uhttps://bdj.pensoft.net/article/54749/04163nas a2200277 4500008004100000245009200041210007200133260007100205300000700276520333800283653001403621653001603635653001503651653001403666653001503680653001303695653001403708653001403722653001403736653001403750653001303764653001603777653001603793100002203809856005403831 2020 eng d00aKaryotypová variabilita stonožkovců (Myriapoda) / Karyotype variability of Myriapoda0 aKaryotypová variabilita stonožkovců Myriapoda Karyotype variabil aPraguebUniverzita Karlova, Přírodovědecká fakultac13/07/2020 a383 a

Abstrakt: Bakalářská práce pojednává o diploidních počtech chromozomů, jejich morfologii a chromozomovém mechanismu určení pohlaví u čtyřech tříd podkmene Myriapoda. Pozornost je zároveň věnována vzájemným fylogenetickým vztahům v rámci podkmene. Přehled literatury ukazuje míru prozkoumanosti cytogenetických charakteristik u jednotlivých tříd, která je zejména ve třídách Pauropoda a Symphyla stále velmi nízká a v rámci třídy Diplopoda je stále ještě velké množství řádů, kde nám tyto informace zcela chybí. Cytogenetické analýzy odhalily celkové rozpětí počtu chromozomů pro: Pauropoda 2n = 12 – 27, Symphyla 2n = 11 – 18, Chilopoda 2n = 14 – 54 a Diplopoda 2n = 8 – 30. V rámci všech čtyř tříd se vyskytují jak morfologicky nediferencované pohlavní chromozomy, tak systémy typu XX/XY a XX/X0. Navíc je u řádu Spirostreptida uváděný i systém X1X1X2X2/X1X20. Pouze u malého množství druhů z řádů Glomerida, Calipodida, Julida, Spirostreptida a Lithobiomorpha a čeledi Scutigerellidae se podařilo identifikovat výskyt NORů. V práci se také podařilo identifikovat některé neshody mezi údaji různých prací, kdy se ukazuje, že zejména některé starší studie byly postaveny na špatném pozorování chromozomů v karyotypu.

Karyotype variability of Myriapoda

Abstract: The bachelor thesis deals with diploid numbers of chromosomes, their morphology and chromosome mechanism of sex determination in four classes of the subphylum Myriapoda. Attention is also paid to mutual phylogenetic relationships within the subphylum. A review of the literature shows the degree of examination of cytogenetic characteristics in individual classes, which is still very low, especially in the classes Pauropoda and Symphyla, and within the class Diplopoda there are still a large number of orders where we completely lack this information. Cytogenetic analyzes revealed a total range of chromosome numbers for: Pauropoda 2n = 12 - 27, Symphyla 2n = 11 - 18, Chilopoda 2n = 14 - 54 and Diplopoda 2n = 8 - 30. Within all four classes, there are both morphologically undifferentiated sex chromosomes and XX/XY and XX/X0 systems. In addition, the X1X1X2X2/X1X20 system is mentioned for the order Spirostreptida. Only a small number of species from the orders Glomerida, Calipodida, Julida, Spirostreptida, Lithobiomorpha and from family Scutigerellidae were able to identify the occurrence of NORs. The work also managed to identify some discrepancies between the data of different works, which shows that especially some older studies were based on poor observation of chromosomes in the karyotype.

10aChilopoda10achromosomes10achromozomy10aDiplopoda10afylogeneze10akaryotyp10akaryotype10aMyriapoda10aPauropoda10aphylogeny10aSymphyla10avariabilita10avariability1 aKášová, Adéla uhttps://dspace.cuni.cz/handle/20.500.11956/11972501601nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001500214300001200229490000700241520090700248653001501155653001201170653001501182653001701197653001501214100002701229700002101256700002401277856007001301 2020 eng d a0022-432400aA taxonomic key for nine first record species of Chilopoda-Arthropoda in Central Iraq0 ataxonomic key for nine first record species of ChilopodaArthropo c15/05/2020 a608-6140 v513 a

This study aimed to classified some species of Chilopoda which is the first record in Iraq. The samples collected from April 2018 to March 2019, in some areas of central of Iraq, which are: Baghdad, Anbar, Babylon, Diyala and Qadisiyah. We found nine species from 183 numbers of samples. The species we recorded for a first time in Iraq are: Scolopendra amazonica, S. afer, Cormocephalus nigrificatus, Cryptops anomalans, Geophilus flavus, Haplophilus souletinus, Lithobius microps, Lamyctes emarginatus and Scutigera coleoptrata. The species were supported by photos, then the samples where stored in Iraq Natural History Research center and Museum.

Remark: Keywords are wrong and were not added. The printed keywords belong to the subsequent article (by the same authors) in the issue.

10aChoneiulus10aJulidae10amillipedes10aPolydesmidae10aPolydesmus1 aAl-Doori, Maysaloon, L1 aAzooz, Hayder, W1 aAl-Door, Nibrass, L uhttps://www.lepidopteraresearchfoundation.org/abstract.php?id=21001282nas a2200145 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214300001000226520079400236100002701030700002001057856005901077 2020 eng d a0242-177100aMyriapodes chilopodes et diplopodes des souterrains de Paris et de sa proche banlieue0 aMyriapodes chilopodes et diplopodes des souterrains de Paris et  c03/2020 a39-473 a

Une campagne d’échantillonnage des invertébrés a été menée dans les réseaux souterrains de la ville de Paris et de la banlieue proche. Le présent travail présente les résultats obtenus concernant les myriapodes (chilopodes et diplopodes) issus de ces récoltes. Six espèces de chilopodes (Classe Chilopoda) et neuf espèces de diplopodes (Classe Diplopoda) ont pu être identifiées. Parmi ces dernières, certaines espèces sont nouvelles pour les départements des Yvelines, des Hauts-de-Seine et de la Seine-Saint-Denis. Ces résultats contribuent à l'enrichissement des inventaires et atlas des myriapodes de France (project INAMYFRA).

1 aGeoffroy, Jean-Jacques1 aFerrand, Marina uhttps://publications.ffspeleo.fr/bulletin.php?id=2599901924nas a2200217 4500008004100000245012000041210006900161260001200230300001400242490000700256520127800263653001401541653001501555653001401570653001101584653001201595653001301607100002001620700001701640856004901657 2018 eng d00aChecklist of the Myriapoda in Cretaceous Burmese amber and a correction of the Myriapoda identified by Zhang (2017)0 aChecklist of the Myriapoda in Cretaceous Burmese amber and a cor c12/2020 a1131-11400 v143 a

An inventory of the Myriapoda (Diplopoda, Chilopoda, Symphyla) from Cretaceous Burmese amber, Myanmar, is presented, including the oldest and/or first fossil record for numerous orders. For millipedes (Diplopoda) 527 records, including 460 new specimens determined by us, belonging to 13 of 16 recent orders are listed: Polyxenida, Glomeridesmida, Glomerida, Siphonophorida, Polyzoniida, Platydesmida, Siphoniulida, Chordeumatida, Polydesmida, Stemmiulida, Callipodida, Spirostreptida and Spirobolida. For centipedes, 33 records for 4 of the 5 recent orders are listed: Scutigeromorpha, Lithobiomorpha, Scolopendromorpha and Geophilomorpha. For Symphyla, three records for both families, Scutigerellidae and Scolopendrellidae, are listed. The majority of Diplopoda records (30.5%) are Polydesmida. The record of the Polyzoniida includes first instar octopod juveniles. The checklist includes the first fossil representatives known of the Platydesmida, as well as the oldest known fossils of the Polyxenida, Glomeridesmida, Glomerida, Siphonophorida, Polyzoniida, Siphoniulida, Spirostreptida, as well as both Symphyla families. Misidentifications by Zhang (2017) are corrected; while most Chilopoda in that list are correct, almost all Diplopoda are misidentified.

10aChilopoda10aCretaceous10aDiplopoda10afossil10aMyanmar10aSymphyla1 aWesener, Thomas1 aMoritz, Leif uhttps://checklist.pensoft.net/article/30320/02624nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245006100055210006100116260001500177300000900192490000800201520194600209653001902155653002702174653001802201653002302219653001902242100002002261700002402281700002202305856006702327 2020 eng d a0965-174800aDiversity and evolution of the P450 family in arthropods0 aDiversity and evolution of the P450 family in arthropods c22/10/2020 a1-220 v1273 a

The P450 family (CYP genes) of arthropods encodes diverse enzymes involved in the metabolism of foreign compounds and in essential endocrine or ecophysiological functions. The P450 sequences (CYPome) from 40 arthropod species were manually curated, including 31 complete CYPomes, and a maximum likelihood phylogeny of nearly 3000 sequences is presented. Arthropod CYPomes are assembled from members of six CYP clans of variable size, the CYP2, CYP3, CYP4 and mitochondrial clans, as well as the CYP20 and CYP16 clans that are not found in Neoptera. CYPome sizes vary from two dozen genes in some parasitic species to over 200 in species as diverse as collembolans or ticks. CYPomes are comprised of few CYP families with many genes and many CYP families with few genes, and this distribution is the result of dynamic birth and death processes. Lineage-specific expansions or blooms are found throughout the phylogeny and often result in genomic clusters that appear to form a reservoir of catalytic diversity maintained as heritable units. Among the many P450s with physiological functions, six CYP families are involved in ecdysteroid metabolism. However, five so-called Halloween genes are not universally represented and do not constitute the unique pathway of ecdysteroid biosynthesis. The diversity of arthropod CYPomes has only partially been uncovered to date and many P450s with physiological functions regulating the synthesis and degradation of endogenous signal molecules (including ecdysteroids) and semiochemicals (including pheromones and defense chemicals) remain to be discovered. Sequence diversity of arthropod P450s is extreme, and P450 sequences lacking the universally conserved Cys ligand to the heme have evolved several times. A better understanding of P450 evolution is needed to discern the relative contributions of stochastic processes and adaptive processes in shaping the size and diversity of CYPomes.

10aDetoxification10aEcdysteroid metabolism10aGene clusters10aOrthologous groups10aP450 Evolution1 aDermauw, Wannes1 aVan Leeuwen, Thomas1 aFeyereisen, René uhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S096517482030179X03914nas a2200505 4500008004100000022001400041245012800055210006900183260001500252300000900267490000700276520241600283653002402699653001302723653002302736653002102759653001802780653001802798653002102816653001202837653001902849100002702868700002002895700002202915700002102937700002202958700001802980700001702998700001703015700001803032700002303050700002003073700002303093700002403116700001803140700002403158700002803182700002703210700001903237700002003256700001403276700001903290700002103309856007803330 2020 eng d a1471-214800aFour myriapod relatives – but who are sisters? No end to debates on relationships among the four major myriapod subgroups0 aFour myriapod relatives but who are sisters No end to debates on c04/11/2020 a1-150 v203 a

Background: Phylogenetic relationships among the myriapod subgroups Chilopoda, Diplopoda, Symphyla and Pauropoda are still not robustly resolved. The first phylogenomic study covering all subgroups resolved phylogenetic relationships congruently to morphological evidence but is in conflict with most previously published phylogenetic trees based on diverse molecular data. Outgroup choice and long-branch attraction effects were stated as possible explanations for these incongruencies. In this study, we addressed these issues by extending the myriapod and outgroup taxon sampling using transcriptome data.

Results: We generated new transcriptome data of 42 panarthropod species, including all four myriapod subgroups and additional outgroup taxa. Our taxon sampling was complemented by published transcriptome and genome data resulting in a supermatrix covering 59 species. We compiled two data sets, the first with a full coverage of genes per species (292 single-copy protein-coding genes), the second with a less stringent coverage (988 genes). We inferred phylogenetic relationships among myriapods using different data types, tree inference, and quartet computation approaches. Our results unambiguously support monophyletic Mandibulata and Myriapoda. Our analyses clearly showed that there is strong signal for a single unrooted topology, but a sensitivity of the position of the internal root on the choice of outgroups. However, we observe strong evidence for a clade Pauropoda+Symphyla, as well as for a clade Chilopoda+Diplopoda.

Conclusions: Our best quartet topology is incongruent with current morphological phylogenies which were supported in another phylogenomic study. AU tests and quartet mapping reject the quartet topology congruent to trees inferred with morphological characters. Moreover, quartet mapping shows that confounding signal present in the data set is sufficient to explain the weak signal for the quartet topology derived from morphological characters. Although outgroup choice affects results, our study could narrow possible trees to derivatives of a single quartet topology. For highly disputed relationships, we propose to apply a series of tests (AU and quartet mapping), since results of such tests allow to narrow down possible relationships and to rule out confounding signal.

 

10aArthropod phylogeny10aconflict10aConfounding signal10aInternal rooting10aPhylogenetics10aphylogenomics10aQuartet topology10aRNA-Seq10aTranscriptomes1 aSzucsich, Nikolaus, U.1 aBartel, Daniela1 aBlanke, Alexander1 aBöhm, Alexander1 aDonath, Alexander1 aFukui, Makiko1 aGrove, Simon1 aLiu, Shanlin1 aMacek, Oliver1 aMachida, Ryuichiro1 aMisof, Bernhard1 aNakagaki, Yasutaka1 aPodsiadlowski, Lars1 aSekiya, Kaoru1 aTomizuka, Shigekazu1 aVon Reumont, Björn, M.1 aWaterhouse, Robert, M.1 aWalzl, Manfred1 aMeng, Guanliang1 aZhou, Xin1 aPass, Günther1 aMeusemann, Karen uhttps://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-020-01699-000512nas a2200121 4500008004100000245001800041210001800059300001200077490001000089520021000099100002700309856005400336 1814 eng d00aCrustaceology0 aCrustaceology a383-4370 v7 (2)3 a

Recommended citation: Leach, W. E. (1814): Crustaceology. In: Brewster’s Edinburgh Encyclopaedia, 7 (2): 383-437 + pl. 221. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/37187639

1 aLeach, William, Elford uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/3718763900339nas a2200109 4500008004100000245004300041210004300084300001200127490000700139100002900146856005400175 1878 eng d00aJapanesische Arachniden und Myriapoden0 aJapanesische Arachniden und Myriapoden a735-7980 v271 aKoch, Ludwig, Carl Chris uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/42882269