02221nas a2200157 4500008004100000245008300041210006900124520168100193100003301874700002301907700003001930700002601960700002001986700001902006856003802025 2022 eng d00aDomain Ontologies to Explore and Manage Functional Soil-invertebrate Diversity0 aDomain Ontologies to Explore and Manage Functional Soilinvertebr3 a

Due to their high structural and functional diversity, soil invertebrates are crucial for ecosystem functioning and its stability. This diversity is reflected not only in the multitude of quantitative and qualitative studies, but also in the range of existing vocabularies of characters and character states for functional soil biodiversity. Data mining and text mining are increasingly used to scour large data resources and systematically extract relevant information in a machine-based manner. Controlled vocabularies play a central role in applying these methods to represent implicit and explicit knowledge in so-called knowledge graphs in a structured and machine- and human-readable way. The Specialized Information Service Biodiversity Research (BIOfid) aims at this method of data mobilization from Central European biodiversity literature. In cooperation with the European Soil-Biology Data Warehouse for Soil Protection (EUdaphobase), differing vocabularies on the taxonomy, anatomy, ecology and traits of soil invertebrates are currently being harmonized and mapped onto domain-specific ontologies. In addition to data extraction, these ontologies should also support the interoperable and sustainable management of pan-European soil biodiversity data.

Recommended citation: Martínez-Muñoz, C. A., Driller, C., Aldana-Martín, J. F., Navas-Delgado, I., Hedde, M., & Russell, D. (2022): Domain Ontologies to Explore and Manage Functional Soil-invertebrate Diversity. World Biodiversity Forum 2022 (WBF 2022), Davos, Switzerland. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7074617

1 aMartínez-Muñoz, Carlos, A.1 aDriller, Christine1 aAldana-Martín, José, F.1 aNavas-Delgado, Ismael1 aHedde, Mickaël1 aRussell, David uhttps://zenodo.org/record/707461702124nas a2200301 4500008004100000022002500041245007900066210006900145260001500214300001100229490000800240520123300248653001301481653001401494653001701508653001601525653001901541653002501560100001501585700002301600700002001623700002001643700002501663700002601688700002101714700001801735856006901753 2019 eng d a0012-9658, 1939-917000aA meta food web for invertebrate species collected in a European grassland0 ameta food web for invertebrate species collected in a European g c05/03/2019 ae026790 v1003 a

Patterns of feeding interactions between species are thought to influence the stability of communities and the flux of nutrients and energy through ecosystems. However, surprisingly few well-resolved food webs allow us to evaluate factors that influence the architecture of species interactions. We constructed a meta food web consisting of 714 invertebrate species collected over 9 years of suction and pitfall sampling campaigns in the Jena Experiment, a long-term grassland biodiversity experiment located in Jena, Germany. We summarize information on the 51,496 potential trophic links, which were established using information on diet specificity and species traits that typically constrain feeding interactions (trophic group, body size, and vertical stratification). The list of species identities, traits, and link-derivation rules will be useful not only for tests of plant diversity effects on food web structure within the Jena Experiment, but also for considering consistent construction of food webs from empirical data, and for comparisons of network structure across ecosystems. No copyright or proprietary restrictions are associated with the use of this data set other than citation of this Data Paper.

10afood web10agrassland10ainvertebrate10ameta-matrix10aspecies traits10atrophic interactions1 aHines, Jes1 aGiling, Darren, P.1 aRzanny, Michael1 aVoigt, Winfried1 aMeyer, Sebastian, T.1 aWeisser, Wolfgang, W.1 aEisenhauer, Nico1 aEbeling, Anne uhttps://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.267902448nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245008000055210006900135260001500204300000900219490000700228520175800235653001801993653002002011653001402031653002002045653002202065653002102087653001702108100002002125700001802145856004302163 2020 eng d a2075-445000aSoil Health and Arthropods: From Complex System to Worthwhile Investigation0 aSoil Health and Arthropods From Complex System to Worthwhile Inv c16/01/2020 a1-210 v113 a

The dramatic increase in soil degradation in the last few decades has led to the need to identify methods to define not only soil quality but also, in a holistic approach, soil health. In the past twenty years, indices based on living communities have been proposed alongside the already proven physical-chemical methods. Among them, some soil invertebrates have been included in monitoring programs as bioindicators of soil quality. Being an important portion of soil fauna, soil arthropods are involved in many soil processes such as organic matter decomposition and translocation, nutrient cycling, microflora activity regulation and bioturbation. Many studies have reported the use of soil arthropods to define soil quality; among taxa, some have been explored more in depth, typically Acari and Collembola, while generally less abundant groups, such as Palpigradi or Embioptera, have not been investigated much. This paper aims to evaluate and compare the use of different soil microarthropod taxa in soil degradation/quality studies to highlight which groups are the most reported for soil monitoring and which are the most sensitive to soil degradation. We have decided not to include the two most present and abundant taxa, Acari and Collembola, in this paper in consideration of the vast amount of existing literature and focus the discussion on the other microarthropod groups. We reported some studies for each taxon highlighting the use of the group as soil quality indicator. A brief section reporting some indices based on soil microarthropods is proposed at the end of this specific discussion. This paper can be considered as a reference point in the use of soil arthropods to estimate soil quality and health.

10abioindicators10amacroarthropods10amesofauna10amicroarthropods10asoil biodiversity10asoil degradation10asoil quality1 aMenta, Cristina1 aRemelli, Sara uhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/11/1/5401601nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001500214300001200229490000700241520090700248653001501155653001201170653001501182653001701197653001501214100002701229700002101256700002401277856007001301 2020 eng d a0022-432400aA taxonomic key for nine first record species of Chilopoda-Arthropoda in Central Iraq0 ataxonomic key for nine first record species of ChilopodaArthropo c15/05/2020 a608-6140 v513 a

This study aimed to classified some species of Chilopoda which is the first record in Iraq. The samples collected from April 2018 to March 2019, in some areas of central of Iraq, which are: Baghdad, Anbar, Babylon, Diyala and Qadisiyah. We found nine species from 183 numbers of samples. The species we recorded for a first time in Iraq are: Scolopendra amazonica, S. afer, Cormocephalus nigrificatus, Cryptops anomalans, Geophilus flavus, Haplophilus souletinus, Lithobius microps, Lamyctes emarginatus and Scutigera coleoptrata. The species were supported by photos, then the samples where stored in Iraq Natural History Research center and Museum.

Remark: Keywords are wrong and were not added. The printed keywords belong to the subsequent article (by the same authors) in the issue.

10aChoneiulus10aJulidae10amillipedes10aPolydesmidae10aPolydesmus1 aAl-Doori, Maysaloon, L1 aAzooz, Hayder, W1 aAl-Door, Nibrass, L uhttps://www.lepidopteraresearchfoundation.org/abstract.php?id=21002213nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245010800055210006900163260001500232300000900247520153700256653001501793653001001808653001601818653001601834653001601850653001101866100002401877700002801901700002301929856003101952 2020 eng d a1026-051X00aNew data on lithobiomorph centipedes (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha) from anthropogenic habitats of Siberia0 aNew data on lithobiomorph centipedes Chilopoda Lithobiomorpha fr c02/11/2020 a9-143 a

An annotated list of nine species of centipedes found in the urban, suburban, agricultural and anthropogenic habitats of Siberia is given. Lamyctes africanus (Porath, 1871) is recorded from Russia for the first time. Lamyctes emarginatus (Newport, 1844) is new for the fauna of the Republic of Altai, Lithobius nordenskioeldii Stuxberg, 1876 is new for Irkutskaya Oblast, and Lithobius lucifugus L. Koch, 1862 is newly reported from Kras­noyarskii Krai and the Republic of Khakassia.

Новые сведения по многоножкам-костянкам (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha) из антропогенных местообитаний Сибири

Резюме: Приводится аннотированный список 9 видов многоножек-костянок из урбанизированных, пригородных, сельскохозяйственных и других антропогенных местообитаний Сибири. Впервые из России указывается Lamyctes africanus (Porath, 1871). Впервые для Республики Алтай приводится Lamyctes emarginatus (Newport, 1844), для Иркутской области – Lithobius nordenskioeldii Stuxberg, 1876, а для Красноярского края и Республики Хакасия – Lithobius lucifugus L. Koch, 1862.

10acentipedes10afauna10aHenicopidae10aLithobiidae10anew records10aRussia1 aNefediev, Pavel, S.1 aFarzalieva, Gyulli, Sh.1 aEfimov, Dmitri, A. uhttp://www.biosoil.ru/FEE/00921nas a2200145 4500008004100000022001400041245016000055210006900215260001500284300001100299490000700310520038800317100002000705856005000725 1844 eng d a0374-548100aA List of the species of Myriapoda, Order Chilopoda, contained in the Cabinets of the British Museum, with synoptic descriptions of forty-seven new Species0 aList of the species of Myriapoda Order Chilopoda contained in th c01/02/1844 a94-1010 v133 a

Recommended citation: Newport, G. (1844): A List of the species of Myriapoda, Order Chilopoda, contained in the Cabinets of the British Museum, with synoptic descriptions of forty-seven new Species. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, including Zoology, Botany and Geology, ser. 1, 13 (82): 94-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03745484409442576

1 aNewport, George uhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/366301112nas a2200253 4500008004100000022001400041245007600055210006900131260001500200300001000215490000700225520036800232653001400600653001500614653001600629100001800645700002700663700002300690700002400713700002200737700002500759700002200784856005200806 2010 eng d a1313-298900aA common terminology for the external anatomy of centipedes (Chilopoda)0 acommon terminology for the external anatomy of centipedes Chilop c18/11/2010 a17-510 v693 a

A common terminology for the external morphological characters of centipedes (Chilopoda) is proposed. Terms are selected from the alternatives used in the English literature, preferring those most frequently used or those that have been introduced explicitly. A total of 330 terms are defined and illustrated, and another ca. 500 alternatives are listed.

10aChilopoda10amorphology10aterminology1 aBonato, Lucio1 aEdgecombe, Gregory, D.1 aLewis, John, G. E.1 aMinelli, Alessandro1 aPereira, Luis, A.1 aShelley, Rowland, M.1 aZapparoli, Marzio uhttp://zookeys.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=246601921nas a2200265 4500008004100000245005800041210005600099300001100155490000700166520120400173653001501377653001401392653001401406653002301420653000801443653001001451653001001461653001501471653000901486653001201495653001301507100003301520700003001553856007201583 2018 eng d00aChecklist of the centipedes (Chilopoda) of Hispaniola0 aChecklist of the centipedes Chilopoda of Hispaniola a74-1010 v123 a

Ten years have passed since the last checklist of Hispaniolan Chilopoda was done and the last bibliographic compendium was published. In this work we expand the former list of species and bibliography, update the taxonomic classification and provide an assessment on Chilobase records. A new intensive literature review was performed and both recent and formerly overlooked myriapodological works were included. The treatment of supraspecific taxonomic ranks was updated and follows Chilobase 2.0. This catalogue lists 4 fossil taxa as well as 24 extant species of centipedes from Hispaniola, 9 of which are endemic. For each extant species considered, there is information on Hispaniolan synonymies and geographic distribution. Included are some clarifications on synonymies and locality problems, and species with uncertain taxonomic status are indicated. Chilobase 2.0 was tested for completeness and accuracy. We propose several updates, grouped by incorrect species records, records not backed by known literature and species not under their currently accepted synonym. We also recommend chilopodologists to maintain active collaboration and send their updates to this useful database.

10acentipedes10aChilobase10aChilopoda10aDominican Republic10aEoL10afauna10aHaiti10aHispaniola10aITIS10aMCZbase10aMyriaLit1 aMartínez-Muñoz, Carlos, A.1 aPerez-Gelabert, Daniel, E uhttp://novitatescaribaea.do/index.php/novitates/article/view/86/155