02503nas a2200217 4500008004100000022001400041245005700055210005300112260001500165300000800180490000600188520176400194653001201958653001501970653001401985653001601999653001702015653001602032100003302048856020402081 2023 eng d a2628-238000aThe correct authorship of Arthropoda—A reappraisal0 acorrect authorship of Arthropoda—A reappraisal c04/05/2023 a1-80 v63 a

Abstract: The scientific name Arthropoda has been repeatedly cited with various incorrect authorship data. This unsatisfactory situation was reviewed in 2013 and the “correct citation” was affirmed to be “Arthropoda von Siebold, 1848” based on the available evidence. Here, the review of historical literature is expanded with additional sources from the Biodiversity Heritage Library. The Greek compound noun “Arthropoda” was used as a scientific name at the rank of class already in 1843, containing the subclasses Crustacea, Arachnoidea, and Insecta. Additionally, the French morphological term “arthropodes” has been used in Zoology since at least 1832. The new citation of the name is proposed as “Arthropoda Gravenhorst, 1843”.

Zusammenfassung: Der wissenschaftliche Name Arthropoda wurde wiederholt mit verschiedenen falschen Urheberangaben zitiert. Die unbefriedigende Situation wurde 2013 überprüft und die „korrekte Zitierung“ auf der Grundlage der verfügbaren Literatur mit „Arthropoda von Siebold, 1848“ bestätigt. Hier wird die Recherche historischer Literatur um zusätzliche Quellen aus der Biodiversity Heritage Library erweitert. Das griechische zusammengesetzte Substantiv „Arthropoda“ wurde bereits 1843 als wissenschaftlicher Name im Rang einer Klasse verwendet, der die Unterklassen Crustacea, Arachnoidea und Insecta enthielt. Darüber hinaus wird der französische morphologische Begriff „arthropodes“ in der Zoologie seit mindestens 1832 verwendet. Die neue Zitation des Namens wird als „Arthropoda Gravenhorst, 1843“ vorgeschlagen.

10aanatomy10aArthropoda10aDumortier10aGravenhorst10anomenclature10avon Siebold1 aMartínez-Muñoz, Carlos, A. uhttps://bioone.org/journals/integrative-systematics-stuttgart-contributions-to-natural-history/volume-6/issue-1/2023.472723/The-correct-authorship-of-ArthropodaA-reappraisal/10.18476/2023.472723.full02298nas a2200169 4500008004100000245020100041210006900242260001900311490000700330520164900337653001501986653001502001653002602016100001702042700002502059856004402084 2016 eng d00aReproduction, egg morphology and development observed in two Australian penicillate millipedes, Lophoturus queenslandicus (Lophoproctidae) and Phryssonotus novaehollandiae (Synxenidae) (Diplopoda)0 aReproduction egg morphology and development observed in two Aust c16 August 20160 v643 a

Lophoproctid and synxenid millipede species observed in this study showed clear differences in their
sexual reproduction, including sperm web structure, egg morphology and development compared with species from
Polyxenidae. Male Lophoturus queenslandicus (Lophoproctidae) produce a single spermatophore on a sperm web
without signal threads due to their lack of silk-producing coxal glands. Females of this species lay fewer eggs and differ
in their egg cluster arrangement, which includes nest trichomes for protection. Lophoproctid chorion has a thin
protective membrane and the pupoid has fused papillae covering the entire anterior region and an aperture bordered
by protective papillate sensilla is present at the apex of the pupoid. Lophoproctid millipedes have a comparatively short
intermoult period between stadia. In contrast, male Phryssonotus novaehollandiae (Synxenidae) produce two
spermatophores separated by a large gap on their sperm web, with signal threads that are less obvious. Synxenid chorion
and pupoid stages were unique; the chorion was tough and thick and the pupoid had anterior projections without an
aperture bordered by sensilla, unlike those observed in lophoproctid and polyxenid millipedes. This study extends
knowledge of the reproduction of species from three major millipede families from the Suborder Polyxenida
(Penicillata: Diplopoda). Additionally, the results indicate that the reproductive strategies of Australian lophoproctid
and synxenid species are adapted to their harsh environment.

10aArthropoda10amorphology10areproductive biology.1 aHuynh, Cuong1 aVeenstra, Anneke, A. uhttps://www.publish.csiro.au/zo/zo1603502637nas a2200265 4500008004100000022001400041245011400055210006900169260001500238300001600253490000800269520179300277653001502070653001902085653002102104653001402125653002302139100002702162700003102189700001902220700003202239700002402271700001702295856005902312 2020 eng d a0027-842400aAquatic stem group myriapods close a gap between molecular divergence dates and the terrestrial fossil record0 aAquatic stem group myriapods close a gap between molecular diver c06/04/2020 a8966 - 89720 v1173 a

Identifying marine or freshwater fossils that belong to the stem groups of the major terrestrial arthropod radiations is a longstanding challenge. Molecular dating and fossils of their pancrustacean sister group predict that myriapods originated in the Cambrian, much earlier than their oldest known fossils, but uncertainty about stem group Myriapoda confounds efforts to resolve the timing of the group’s terrestrialization. Among a small set of candidates for membership in the stem group of Myriapoda, the Cambrian to Triassic euthycarcinoids have repeatedly been singled out. The only known Devonian euthycarcinoid, Heterocrania rhyniensis from the Rhynie and Windyfield cherts hot spring complex in Scotland, reveals details of head structures that constrain the evolutionary position of euthycarcinoids. The head capsule houses an anterior cuticular tentorium, a feature uniquely shared by myriapods and hexapods. Confocal microscopy recovers myriapod-like characters of the preoral chamber, such as a prominent hypopharynx supported by tentorial bars and superlinguae between the mandibles and hypopharynx, reinforcing an alliance between euthycarcinoids and myriapods recovered in recent phylogenetic analysis. The Cambrian occurrence of the earliest euthycarcinoids supplies the oldest compelling evidence for an aquatic stem group for either Myriapoda or Hexapoda, previously a lacuna in the body fossil record of these otherwise terrestrial lineages until the Silurian and Devonian, respectively. The trace fossil record of euthycarcinoids in the Cambrian and Ordovician reveals amphibious locomotion in tidal environments and fills a gap between molecular estimates for myriapod origins in the Cambrian and a post-Ordovician crown group fossil record.

10aArthropoda10aeuthycarcinoid10amolecular dating10aMyriapoda10aTerrestrialization1 aEdgecombe, Gregory, D.1 aStrullu-Derrien, Christine1 aGóral, Tomasz1 aHetherington, Alexander, J.1 aThompson, Christine1 aKoch, Markus uhttp://www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.192073311702552nas a2200301 4500008004100000022001400041245010100055210006900156260001500225300001200240490000800252520168600260653001501946653001401961653001401975653001501989653002302004653001402027653002002041653001302061653002302074100002602097700001802123700001702141700002502158700002002183856004702203 2020 eng d a1313-298900aConservation of terrestrial invertebrates: a review of IUCN and regional Red Lists for Myriapoda0 aConservation of terrestrial invertebrates a review of IUCN and r c28/04/2020 a221-2290 v9303 a

Red Listing of Threatened species is recognized as the most objective approach for evaluating extinction risk of living organisms which can be applied at global or national scales. Invertebrates account for nearly 97% of all animals on the planet but are insufficiently represented in the IUCN Red Lists at both scales. To analyze the occurrence of species present in regional Red Lists, accounts of 48 different countries and regions all over the world were consulted and all data about myriapods (Myriapoda) ever assessed in Red Lists at any level assembled. Myriapod species assessments were found in eleven regional Red Lists; however, no overlap between the species included in the global IUCN Red List and the regional ones was established. This means that myriapod species considered threatened at regional level may not be eligible for international funding specific for protection of native threatened species (more than US$ 25 million were available in the last decade) as most financial instruments tend to support only threatened species included in the IUCN Red List. As the lack of financial resources may limit protection for species in risk of extinction, it is urgent to increase the possibilities of getting financial support for implementation of measures for their protection. A Red List of all Myriapoda species recorded in Red Lists at national or local (596) and global (210) scales totaling 806 species is presented. This list shows for the first time an overview of the current conservation status of Myriapoda species. Here, the urgent need of establishing a Myriapoda Specialist Group in the Species Survival Commission of IUCN is also stressed.

10aArthropoda10aChilopoda10aDiplopoda10aextinction10anational red lists10aPauropoda10arisk assessment10aSymphyla10athreatened species1 aKaram-Gemael, Manoela1 aDecker, Peter1 aStoev, Pavel1 aMarques, Marinez, I.1 aJr, Amazonas, C uhttps://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/48943/03023nas a2200301 4500008004100000022001400041245017400055210006900229260001500298300000900313490000900322520210100331653001202432653001502444653002102459653001502480653001702495653001002512653001102522653001502533653001602548653001102564653001502575100002302590700002302613700002302636856006202659 2020 eng d a1175-532600aThe millipede family Conotylidae in northwestern North America, with a complete bibliography of the family (Diplopoda, Chordeumatida, Heterochordeumatidea, Conotyloidea)0 amillipede family Conotylidae in northwestern North America with  c19/03/2020 a1-780 v47533 a

The center of diversity for the chordeumatidan millipede family Conotylidae is northwestern North America, where five of six subfamilies and ten of fourteen previously described genera occur; in this paper, seven additional new genera and 33 new species from the region are described. New species in the genus Taiyutyla Chamberlin, 1952 are: Taiyutyla tillamook, Taiyutyla acuphora, and Taiyutyla amicitia; in the genus Bollmanella Chamberlin, 1941: Bollmanella bombus, Bollmanella washingtonensis and Bollmanella leonardi; in the genus Brunsonia Loomis & Schmitt, 1971: Brunsonia pulchra, Brunsonia digitata, Brunsonia wenatchee, Brunsonia chelanoparva, Brunsonia chelanomagna, Brunsonia selwayana and Brunsonia benewah. Vancouvereuma n. gen. is described with the type species Taiyutyla shawi Shear 2004. Calityla n. gen. includes the new species Calityla siskiyou, Calityla ubicki, Calityla trinitaria, Calityla essigi, and Calityla humboldtensis. Ovaskella, n. gen. includes the new species Ovaskella ovaskae and Ovaskella sinuosa. Karagama, n. gen. includes the new species Karagama ladybird. Complicatella, n. gen. includes the new species Complicatella pectenifera and Complicatella neili. Bifurcatella n. gen. includes the new species Bifurcatella olympiana, Bifurcatella hoh, Bifurcatella angulata, Bifurcatella pacifica, Bifurcatella germania, Bifurcatella uniclada, Bifurcatella inflata and Bifurcatella hobo. Loomisiella, n. gen. includes the new species Loomisiella evergreen and Loomisiella pylei. New distribution records are provided for numerous previously described species of conotylids. A complete bibliography of the family Conotylidae of the world is also included.

10aAlberta10aArthropoda10aBritish Columbia10aCalifornia10adescriptions10aIdaho10aNevada10anew genera10anew species10aOregon10aWashington1 aShear, William, A.1 aRichart, Casey, H.1 aWong, Victoria, L. uhttps://www.biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/issue/view/zootaxa.4753.103010nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245008200055210006900137260001500206300001000221490000900231520228700240653001502527653001702542653001402559653002302573653002102596653001002617653002802627653001602655100003102671856006602702 2020 eng d a1175-532600aChecklist, Bibliography and Quantitative Data of the Arthropods of Hispaniola0 aChecklist Bibliography and Quantitative Data of the Arthropods o c10/03/2020 a1-6680 v47493 a

An updated and extensively revised checklist of the arthropods of Hispaniola (Dominican Republic and Haiti) is presented 11 years after the publication of the original in 2008. It integrates and quantifies all the terrestrial and surrounding marine arthropod species (plus those of Tardigrada and Onychophora), reported in the zoological literature for Hispaniola through the middle of 2019.

        A total of 9,920 valid species (8,202 extant and 1,718 fossil) are listed, which represents an increase of 1,683 species (1,369 extant and 314 fossil) from the original list. The largest component is Insecta (6,784 extant and 1,136 fossil), including 2,206 extant species of Coleoptera, 1,042 species of Hemiptera, 929 species of Diptera, 913 species of Lepidoptera and 774 species of Hymenoptera.

        Emphasis is on reviewing and updating the original list, including all newly recorded taxa and all pertinent taxonomic changes proposed since then. Important corrections have been made, and explanatory notes have been added. For example, multiple authors have confused the Lesser Antillean island of Dominica with the Dominican Republic. This error is much more common in the literature than was initially recognized. Erroneous records attributing species from one island to the other have been identified and corrected. The original spelling of the cricket species Scapsipedus bastardoi Otte & Perez-Gelabert, 2009, dedicated to Dominican biologist Ruth H. Bastardo, is corrected to Scapsipedus bastardoae nom. emend.

        High species endemism is typical of the biota of Caribbean islands. In this checklist, a total of 3,161 arthropod species (38.6%) are considered endemic or unique to Hispaniola. Among the speciose groups with higher levels of endemism are the Diplopoda (91.6%), Orthoptera (90.1%), Trichoptera (82.6%), Coleoptera (49.3%) and Araneae (47.5%). Also, a total of 201 arthropod species (174 insects + 27 non-insects) are identified as introduced to the island.

        The accompanying bibliography complements the taxonomic information and includes over 5,000 titles.

10aArthropoda10abiodiversity10aCaribbean10aDominican Republic10aGreater Antilles10aHaiti10aQuantitative assessment10aWest Indies1 aPerez-Gelabert, Daniel, E. uhttps://www.biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.4749.1.101693nas a2200277 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001500214300000600229490000900235520090300244653001501147653001701162653001401179653002301193653001301216653002101229653001001250653001501260653002301275653001201298653001601310100003101326856005801357 2008 eng d a1175-532600aArthropods of Hispaniola (Dominican Republic and Haiti): A checklist and bibliography0 aArthropods of Hispaniola Dominican Republic and Haiti A checklis c30/07/2008 a10 v18313 a

This work is a first attempt to integrate into one list and quantify all the known species of Hispaniolan arthropods. It includes all the terrestrial and surrounding marine arthropod species (plus those of Tardigrada and Onychophora) known to me to be reported for the island of Hispaniola until the end of 2007, as well as 158 species that are reported here as new records for the Dominican Republic and the island. A total of 8,237 valid species (6,833 extant and 1,404 fossils) are listed, of which the largest component are the insects (5,676 extant and 824 fossil species). Preliminarily, 2,521 arthropod species (36.9%) are considered to be endemic or unique to Hispaniola. Also 84 species are recognized as introduced. The bibliography complements the taxonomic information and includes over 4,000 titles. Brief annotations are also given on the history of entomology in Hispaniola.

10aArthropoda10abibliography10achecklist10aDominican Republic10aendemics10aGreater Antilles10aHaiti10aHispaniola10aintroduced species10aSPECIES10aWest Indies1 aPerez-Gelabert, Daniel, E. uhttps://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/issue/view/zootaxa.1831.101248nas a2200205 4500008004100000022001400041245013900055210006900194300001400263490000700277520053900284653002000823653001500843653001400858653001500872653001400887100002400901700002300925856009400948 2000 eng d a0263-593300aMicrodecemplicida, a new order of minute arthropleurideans (Arthropoda: Myriapoda) from the Devonian of New York State, U.S.A.Abstract0 aMicrodecemplicida a new order of minute arthropleurideans Arthro a351 - 3750 v903 a

Microdecemplex rolfei, gen. and sp. nov., a new microarthropleuridean less than 5 mm long, is described from the Middle Devonian Panther Mountain Formation of New York State, U.S.A. The specimens consist of organically preserved cuticle, with some preserving the only cephalic structures known for arthropleurideans. A new order, Microdecemplicida, and a new family, Microdecemplicidae, are established. The probable phylogenetic position of the Microdecemplicida as one of the basal clades of Diplopoda is proposed.

10aArthropleuridea10aArthropoda10aDiplopoda10amorphology10aphylogeny1 aWilson, Heather, M.1 aShear, William, A. uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S026359330000267403944nas a2200301 4500008004100000245014700041210006900188490000600257520291700263653001303180653001503193653001303208653001303221653001303234653003103247653001303278653001403291100001603305700002603321700002503347700001603372700002903388700001903417700002703436700002503463700002103488856013303509 2012 eng d00aComparative description of ten transcriptomes of newly sequenced invertebrates and efficiency estimation of genomic sampling in non-model taxa0 aComparative description of ten transcriptomes of newly sequenced0 v93 aIntroduction: Traditionally, genomic or transcriptomic data have been restricted to a few model or emerging model organisms, and to a handful of species of medical and/or environmental importance. Next-generation sequencing techniques have the capability of yielding massive amounts of gene sequence data for virtually any species at a modest cost. Here we provide a comparative analysis of de novo assembled transcriptomic data for ten non-model species of previously understudied animal taxa.Results: cDNA libraries of ten species belonging to five animal phyla (2 Annelida [including Sipuncula], 2 Arthropoda, 2 Mollusca, 2 Nemertea, and 2 Porifera) were sequenced in different batches with an Illumina Genome Analyzer II (read length 100 or 150 bp), rendering between ca. 25 and 52 million reads per species. Read thinning, trimming, and de novo assembly were performed under different parameters to optimize output. Between 67,423 and 207,559 contigs were obtained across the ten species, post-optimization. Of those, 9,069 to 25,681 contigs retrieved blast hits against the NCBI non-redundant database, and approximately 50% of these were assigned with Gene Ontology terms, covering all major categories, and with similar percentages in all species. Local blasts against our datasets, using selected genes from major signaling pathways and housekeeping genes, revealed high efficiency in gene recovery compared to available genomes of closely related species. Intriguingly, our transcriptomic datasets detected multiple paralogues in all phyla and in nearly all gene pathways, including housekeeping genes that are traditionally used in phylogenetic applications for their purported single-copy nature.Conclusions: We generated the first study of comparative transcriptomics across multiple animal phyla (comparing two species per phylum in most cases), established the first Illumina-based transcriptomic datasets for sponge, nemertean, and sipunculan species, and generated a tractable catalogue of annotated genes (or gene fragments) and protein families for ten newly sequenced non-model organisms, some of commercial importance (i.e., Octopus vulgaris). These comprehensive sets of genes can be readily used for phylogenetic analysis, gene expression profiling, developmental analysis, and can also be a powerful resource for gene discovery. The characterization of the transcriptomes of such a diverse array of animal species permitted the comparison of sequencing depth, functional annotation, and efficiency of genomic sampling using the same pipelines, which proved to be similar for all considered species. In addition, the datasets revealed their potential as a resource for paralogue detection, a recurrent concern in various aspects of biological inquiry, including phylogenetics, molecular evolution, development, and cellular biochemistry. © 2012 Riesgo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.10aAnnelida10aArthropoda10aIllumina10aMollusca10aNemertea10anext-generation sequencing10aPorifera10aSipuncula1 aRiesgo, Ana1 aAndrade, Sónia, C.S.1 aSharma, Prashant, P.1 aNovo, Marta1 aPérez-Porro, Alicia, R.1 aVahtera, Varpu1 aGonzález, Vanessa, L.1 aKawauchi, Gisele, Y.1 aGiribet, Gonzalo uhttps://myriatrix.myspecies.info/content/comparative-description-ten-transcriptomes-newly-sequenced-invertebrates-and-efficiency01664nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245012500055210006900180300000600249490000600255520092900261653000801190653001501198653001401213653001601227653001801243653001901261653001601280653000801296100001701304700001901321856008201340 2017 eng d a2056-306X00aSerotonergic neurons in the ventral nerve cord of Chilopoda - a mandibulate pattern of individually identifiable neurons0 aSerotonergic neurons in the ventral nerve cord of Chilopoda a ma a90 v33 a

Given the numerous hypotheses concerning arthropod phylogeny, independent data are needed to supplement knowledge based on traditional external morphology and modern molecular sequence information. One promising approach involves comparisons of the structure and development of the nervous system. Along these lines, the morphology of serotonin-immunoreactive neurons in the ventral nerve cord has been investigated in numerous tetraconate taxa (Crustacea and Hexapoda). It has been shown that these neurons can be identified individually due to their comparably low number, characteristic soma position, and neurite morphology, thus making it possible to establish homologies at the single cell level. Within Chilopoda (centipedes), detailed analyses of major branching patterns of serotonin-immunoreactive neurons are missing, but are crucial for developing meaningful conclusions on the homology of single cells.

10a5HT10aArthropoda10aEvolution10aMandibulata10aMiracrustacea10aNeurophylogeny10aTetraconata10aVNC1 aSombke, Andy1 aStemme, Torben uhttp://zoologicalletters.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40851-017-0070-y