@inbook {1987, title = {Ar{\'a}cnidos y miri{\'a}podos: alacranes, ara{\~n}as, ciempi{\'e}s y otros parientes artr{\'o}podos poco conocidos}, booktitle = {Atlas de la biodiversidad de Sinaloa}, year = {2002}, pages = {211-219}, publisher = {El Colegio de Sinaloa}, organization = {El Colegio de Sinaloa}, address = {Culiac{\'a}n}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: S\ánchez-Vargas, D. A. (2002): Ar\ácnidos y miri\ápodos: alacranes, ara\ñas, ciempi\és y otros parientes artr\ópodos poco conocidos. Pp. 211-219. In: Cifuentes-Lemus, J. L., Gaxiola-L\ópez, J. (Eds.). Atlas de la biodiversidad de Sinaloa. M\éxico: El Colegio de Sinaloa.

Publication date: 10/2002.

}, author = {S{\'a}nchez-Vargas, D. A.} } @article {1808, title = {Description of a new British Iulus}, journal = {The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, including Zoology, Botany and Geology, ser. 1}, volume = {11}, year = {1843}, month = {01/04/1843}, pages = {316}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Newport, G. (1843): Description of a new British Iulus. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, including Zoology, Botany and Geology, ser. 1, 11 (70): 316. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/18642221

}, issn = {0374-5481}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/18642221}, author = {Newport, George} } @inbook {1798, title = {Tuhatjalkaiset - Myriapods - Myriapoda}, booktitle = {Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus {\textendash} Punainen kirja 2019}, year = {2019}, pages = {340-343}, publisher = {Ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}ministeri{\"o} \& Suomen ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}keskus}, organization = {Ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}ministeri{\"o} \& Suomen ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}keskus}, address = {Helsinki}, abstract = {

Viittausohje, kun viitataan yksitt\äiseen Punaisen listan lukuun: Vahtera, V. 2019. Tuhatjalkaiset. Julk.: Hyv\ärinen, E., Jusl\én, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddstr\öm, A. \& Liukko, U.-M. (toim.) 2019. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus \– Punainen kirja 2019. Ymp\ärist\öministeri\ö \& Suomen ymp\ärist\ökeskus. Helsinki. S. 340-343. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Reference of a separate chapter of the Red List: Vahtera, V. 2019. Myriapods. In: Hyv\ärinen, E., Jusl\én, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddstr\öm, A. \& Liukko, U.-M. (eds.) 2019. The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species. Ministry of the Environment \& Finnish Environment Institute. Helsinki. P. 340-343. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Summary: Myriapoda are a diverse group of terrestrial arthropods, some of which are herbivores, some predators and some decomposers. There are four classes of Myriapoda: centipedes (Chilopoda), millipedes (Diplopoda), pauropods (Pauropoda), and symphylans (Symphyla). In Finland, a total of 63 species have been found: 21 centipede, 28 millipede, eight pauropod, and six symphylan species. In total, there are ten red-listed species: the critically endangered (CR) Geophilus carpophagus, which was classified as Regionally Extinct (RE) in the two previous assessments, and the Near Threatened (NT) species G. electricus, G. truncorum and Julus scanicus. These species only have one known locality each, and no new observations have been made of the three Near Threatened (NT) species for a long time. Six species have been categorised as Data Deficient (DD). Many species were classified as Not Evaluated (NE) due to insufficient information on their occurrence. While no monitoring of Myriapoda has been organised in Finland, the information on the spread of the species in this country could be updated by organising a monitoring study of a few years in duration.

}, issn = {978-952-11-4973-3, ISBN 978-952-11-4974-0}, url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501}, author = {Vahtera, Varpu} } @book {1797, title = {Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus {\textendash} Punainen kirja 2019}, year = {2019}, pages = {704}, publisher = {Ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}ministeri{\"o} \& Suomen ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}keskus}, organization = {Ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}ministeri{\"o} \& Suomen ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}keskus}, address = {Helsinki}, abstract = {

Tiivistelm\ä: Julkaisussa esitell\ä\än Suomen lajien viides uhanalaisuusarviointi. Suomen lajim\ä\är\än arvioidaan nyky\ä\än olevan v\ähint\ä\än 48 000. Riitt\äv\ät tiedot uhanalaisuusarviointiin oli 22 418 lajista tai alemmasta taksonista, mik\ä on noin 47 \% lajistosta. Uhanalaisiksi arvioitiin 2 668 lajia tai alempaa taksonia eli noin 11,9 \% arvioiduista lajeista. Punaisen listan lajeja, joihin kuuluvat uhanalaisten lis\äksi h\ävinneet, silm\äll\äpidett\äv\ät ja puutteellisesti tunnetut on yhteens\ä 6 683 (29,8 \%). Arvioiduista lajeista \ä\ärimm\äisen uhanalaisia (CR) on 489, eritt\äin uhanalaisia (EN) 918, vaarantuneita (VU) 1 260, silm\äll\äpidett\ävi\ä (NT) 1 912, puutteellisesti tunnettuja (DD) 1 792, h\ävinneit\ä (RE) 312 ja elinvoimaisia (LC) 15 735. Arviointi tehtiin Kansainv\älisen luonnonsuojeluliiton (IUCN) ohjeiden ja kriteerien mukaan. IUCN:n alueellisen uhanalaisuusarvioinnin kriteerit perustuvat lajien havaittuun, arvioituun, p\ä\äteltyyn tai ennustettuun populaatioiden pienenemiseen, levinneisyys- tai esiintymisalueen kokoon, pieneen ja jatkuvasti taantuvaan tai hyvin pieneen populaatioon tai kvantitatiiviseen analyysiin. Lis\äksi Suomessa on dokumentoitu lajien elinymp\ärist\öt sek\ä uhanalaisuuden syyt ja uhkatekij\ät. Enemmist\ö uhanalaisista lajeista el\ä\ä metsiss\ä (31 \%) sek\ä perinneymp\ärist\öiss\ä ja muissa ihmisen muuttamissa ymp\ärist\öiss\ä (24 \%). Uhanalaisten osuus kunkin elinymp\ärist\ön arvioiduista lajeista on korkein tunturipaljakalla (37,9 \%). Uhanalaisten lajien m\ä\är\ä on suurin hemiboreaalisella ja etel\äboreaalisella vy\öhykkeell\ä Etel\ä-Suomessa. Julkaisussa vertaillaan arvioinnin tuloksia vuoden 2010 tuloksiin esimerkiksi uhanalaisuusindeksin avulla. Lis\äksi julkaisussa tarkastellaan vuoden 2010 uhanalaisuusarvioinnin ohjausryhm\än ehdotusten toteutumista. Arvioinnin tulosten pohjalta Eli\ölajien uhanalaisuuden arvioinnin ohjausryhm\ä (LAUHA) esitt\ä\ä 13 toimenpide-ehdotusta uhanalaisten lajien suojelun, hoidon, tutkimuksen ja seurannan j\ärjest\ämiseksi ja rahoittamiseksi. Arvioinnit on tehty eli\öryhm\äkohtaisissa ty\öryhmiss\ä ja ty\ön tulokset esitell\ä\än eli\öryhmitt\äin 39 luvussa.

Viittausohje, kun viitataan koko julkaisuun: Hyv\ärinen, E., Jusl\én, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddstr\öm, A. \& Liukko, U.-M. (toim.) 2019. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus \– Punainen kirja 2019. Ymp\ärist\öministeri\ö \& Suomen ymp\ärist\ökeskus. Helsinki. 704 s. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Sammandrag: I denna bok presenteras resultat av Finlands femte hotbed\ömning. Finlands artantal uppskattas f\ör tillf\ället till minst 48 000. Tillr\äckliga uppgifter f\ör hotbed\ömning fanns om 22 418 arter eller l\ägre taxa, vilket utg\ör 47 \% av alla arter. Av dessa bed\ömdes 2 667 arter eller l\ägre taxa vara hotade, d.v.s. 11,9 \%. R\ödlistade arter, som f\örutom hotade arter \även innefattar f\örsvunna arter, n\ära hotade arter och arter som det r\åder kunskapsbrist om, uppg\år till 6 683 (29,8 \%). Av de bed\ömda arterna \är 498 akut hotade (CR), 918 starkt hotade (EN), 1 260 s\årbara (VU), 1 912 n\ära hotade (NT), 1 792 med kunskapsbrist (DD), 312 f\örsvunna (RE) och 15 735 livskraftiga. Hoten har bed\ömts p\å basis av Internationella Naturv\årdsunionens (IUCN) regionala hotbed\ömningskriterier. Kriterierna grundar sig p\å observerad, deduktiv eller estimerad minskning av populationer eller utbrednings- och f\örekomstomr\åden, en liten och kontinuerligt minskande eller en mycket liten population eller p\å kvantitativ analys. D\ärut\över har arternas livsmilj\ö, hotorsak och hotfaktorer i Finland dokumenterats. Majoriteten av de hotade arterna lever i skogar (31 \%), v\årdbiotoper och andra kulturmilj\öer (24 \%). Antalet hotade arter \är h\ögst inom den hemiboreala och sydboreala zonen i s\ödra Finland. Andelen hotade arter i en specifik habitattyp \är h\ögst i kalfj\ället(37,9 \%). I publikationen j\ämf\örs resultaten av hotbed\ömningen med resultaten fr\ån \år 2010 t.ex. med hj\älp av r\ödlisteindexet. Vid sidan av bed\ömningsresultaten beskrivs de mest p\åtagliga administrativa och juridiska \åtg\ärder som vidtagits f\ör artskydd samt forskning och \övervakning sedan den f\öreg\ående bed\ömningen. Hotbed\ömningens styrgrupp (LAUHA ) f\öresl\år 13 \åtg\ärder f\ör organisering och finansiering av skydd, v\ård, forskning och \övervakning av hotade arter. Resultaten av bed\ömningen som \är genomf\örd av expertgrupper presenteras i 39 kapitel som omfattar olika organismgrupper.

The Red List of Finnish Species 2019

Abstract: This publication describes the fifth assessment of Finnish threatened species. The current estimated number of species in Finland is at least 48,000. Sufficient information was available for the evaluation of 22,418 species or lower taxa, which is approximately 47\% of all species. In total, 2,667 species or lower taxa (11.9\%) were assessed as threatened. The red-listed species, which, in addition to threatened species, include the species classified as Regionally Extinct, Near Threatened, and Data Deficient, total 6,683 (29.8\%). Of the species evaluated, 489 were classified as Critically Endangered (CR), 918 as Endangered (EN), 1,260 as Vulnerable (VU), 1,912 as Near Threatened (NT), 1,792 as Data Deficient (DD), 312 as Regionally Extinct (RE), and 15,735 as of Least Concern (LC). The assessment was carried out in accordance with guidelines and criteria issued by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and applied in assessments at the regional level. These criteria are based on observed, estimated, inferred, or projected population size reduction; the extent of occurrence or area of occupancy; continuing decline in a small population or a very small size of population; or a quantitative analysis. In addition, species\’ habitats, as well as causes of threat and threat factors, were documented in the Finnish evaluation. The majority of threatened species live in forests (31\%) and in rural biotopes and other cultural habitats (24\%). Of the species assessed the proportion of threatened species is highest in Alpine habitats (37.9\%). The number of threatened species is highest in the hemiboreal and southern boreal zones in southern Finland. The results of the assessment are compared to the previous assessment 2010 for example with the Red List Index. In addition, proceedings of the proposals given by the steering group of the previous assessment are evaluated. The steering group of this assessment made 13 proposals for measures for the arrangement and financing of the conservation, management, research, and monitoring of threatened species. The results of the work of the expert groups responsible for the evaluation are presented in 39 organism group -specific sections.

Reference of the publication: Hyv\ärinen, E., Jusl\én, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddstr\öm, A. \& Liukko, U.-M. (eds.) 2019. The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species. Ymp\ärist\öministeri\ö \& Suomen ymp\ärist\ökeskus. Helsinki. 704 p. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Publication date: 26/02/2019

}, keywords = {bed{\"o}mning, conservation of species, hotade arter, IUCN, lajiston suojelu, punainen lista, Red list, r{\"o}dlista, skydd av arter, threat assessment, threatened species, uhanalaiset lajit, uhanalaisuusarviointi}, issn = {978-952-11-4973-3, ISBN 978-952-11-4974-0}, url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501}, author = {Hyv{\"a}rinen, Esko and Jusl{\'e}n, Aino and Kemppainen, Eija and Uddstr{\"o}m, Annika and Liukko, Ulla-Maija} } @article {1760, title = {Note on a larval Lithobius-like Myriapod}, journal = {The American Naturalist, an illustrated magazine of Natural History}, volume = {14}, year = {1880}, month = {05/1880}, pages = {376}, type = {Note}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/41039258}, author = {Ryder, John A.} } @book {1547, title = {Systema naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis.}, volume = {1 (2)}, year = {1767}, pages = {533-1327}, publisher = {Impensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii}, organization = {Impensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii}, edition = {12}, address = {Stockholm}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.68927}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/137240}, author = {Linnaeus, Carolus} } @article {1500, title = {A meta food web for invertebrate species collected in a European grassland}, journal = {Ecology}, volume = {100}, year = {2019}, month = {05/03/2019}, pages = {e02679}, abstract = {

Patterns of feeding interactions between species are thought to influence the stability of communities and the flux of nutrients and energy through ecosystems. However, surprisingly few well-resolved food webs allow us to evaluate factors that influence the architecture of species interactions. We constructed a meta food web consisting of 714 invertebrate species collected over 9 years of suction and pitfall sampling campaigns in the Jena Experiment, a long-term grassland biodiversity experiment located in Jena, Germany. We summarize information on the 51,496 potential trophic links, which were established using information on diet specificity and species traits that typically constrain feeding interactions (trophic group, body size, and vertical stratification). The list of species identities, traits, and link-derivation rules will be useful not only for tests of plant diversity effects on food web structure within the Jena Experiment, but also for considering consistent construction of food webs from empirical data, and for comparisons of network structure across ecosystems. No copyright or proprietary restrictions are associated with the use of this data set other than citation of this Data Paper.

}, keywords = {food web, grassland, invertebrate, meta-matrix, species traits, trophic interactions}, issn = {0012-9658, 1939-9170}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2679}, url = {https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.2679}, author = {Hines, Jes and Giling, Darren P. and Rzanny, Michael and Voigt, Winfried and Meyer, Sebastian T. and Weisser, Wolfgang W. and Eisenhauer, Nico and Ebeling, Anne} } @article {1489, title = {[Tausendfu{\ss} (Julus terrestris)]}, volume = {473}, year = {1900}, month = {20/06/1900}, pages = {2}, edition = {Erste Morgen-Ausgabe}, chapter = {Vermischte Nachrichten}, address = {K{\"o}ln}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Anonymous (1900): [Tausendfu\ß (Julus terrestris)]. K\ölnische Zeitung, Mittwoch, 20. Juni. 1900 - Nr. 473, Erste Morgen-Ausgabe, Vermischte Nachrichten, page 2. https://zeitpunkt.nrw/ulbbn/periodical/zoom/7594565

}, url = {https://zeitpunkt.nrw/ulbbn/periodical/zoom/7594565}, author = {Anonymous} } @book {1462, title = {Systema naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis.}, volume = {1}, year = {1758}, pages = {824}, publisher = {Impensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii}, organization = {Impensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii}, edition = {10}, address = {Stockholm}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Linnaeus, C. (1758): Systema natur\æ per Regna Tria natur\æ, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, Cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. Editio decima, reformata. Tomus I. Impensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii, Holmi\æ. 824 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542

}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/10277}, author = {Linnaeus, Carolus} } @article {1429, title = {[Postcard to Ludwig D{\"o}derlein]}, year = {1900}, month = {20/06/1900}, publisher = {Archives de la Ville et de l{\textquoteright}Eurom{\'e}tropole de Strasbourg}, address = {Strasbourg, Grand Est, France}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Verhoeff, C. W. (1900, June 20). [Postcard to Ludwig D\öderlein]. Archives de la Ville et de l\’Eurom\étropole de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Grand Est, France.

}, author = {Verhoeff, Carl Wilhelm} } @article {1425, title = {[Letter to Ludwig D{\"o}derlein]}, year = {1898}, month = {08/08/1898}, publisher = {Archives de la Ville et de l{\textquoteright}Eurom{\'e}tropole de Strasbourg}, address = {Strasbourg, Grand Est, France}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Verhoeff, C. W. (1898, August 8). [Letter to Ludwig D\öderlein]. Archives de la Ville et de l\’Eurom\étropole de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Grand Est, France.

}, author = {Verhoeff, Carl Wilhelm} } @article {1366, title = {Myriapod Trivia - Curiosities of British Natural History \& The Rabbit and the Centipede}, journal = {Bulletin of the British Myriapod \& Isopod Group}, volume = {32}, year = {2020}, month = {03/04/2020}, pages = {95-97}, type = {Miscellanea}, chapter = {95}, abstract = {

Over the years with an interest in the more formal study of myriapods, especially centipedes, I have also accumulated a few items of what we might call \"trivia\" - prints, pictures etc. The two items here come into that category and I know there are many more like them around and they are offered as light relief for Bulletin readers. I know little about The Penny Magazine but it clearly represents a cheap, presumably weekly, publication dedicated to that great Victorian aim of \"self improvement\". This issue comprises eight pages with items as varied as \"Essays on the lives of Remarkable Painters No.XXXI: Andrea del Sarto\", \"The English and Irish Ordnance Surveys\" and \"The Hareem of Ibrahim Pasha\". I have abridged the item on Centipedes and Millipedes from the original three pages. \"The Rabbit and the Centipede\" comes from a children\&$\#$39;s book of 1907. I am not sure that it sheds any particular new light on myriapod locomotory mechanisms.

}, issn = {2513-9444}, url = {https://www.bmig.org.uk/sites/www.bmig.org.uk/files/bulletin/BullBMIG32(2020)95-97_Myriapod-Trivia.pdf}, author = {Barber, Anthony D.} } @article {1188, title = {Soil Health and Arthropods: From Complex System to Worthwhile Investigation}, journal = {Insects}, volume = {11}, year = {2020}, month = {16/01/2020}, pages = {1-21}, abstract = {

The dramatic increase in soil degradation in the last few decades has led to the need to identify methods to define not only soil quality but also, in a holistic approach, soil health. In the past twenty years, indices based on living communities have been proposed alongside the already proven physical-chemical methods. Among them, some soil invertebrates have been included in monitoring programs as bioindicators of soil quality. Being an important portion of soil fauna, soil arthropods are involved in many soil processes such as organic matter decomposition and translocation, nutrient cycling, microflora activity regulation and bioturbation. Many studies have reported the use of soil arthropods to define soil quality; among taxa, some have been explored more in depth, typically Acari and Collembola, while generally less abundant groups, such as Palpigradi or Embioptera, have not been investigated much. This paper aims to evaluate and compare the use of different soil microarthropod taxa in soil degradation/quality studies to highlight which groups are the most reported for soil monitoring and which are the most sensitive to soil degradation. We have decided not to include the two most present and abundant taxa, Acari and Collembola, in this paper in consideration of the vast amount of existing literature and focus the discussion on the other microarthropod groups. We reported some studies for each taxon highlighting the use of the group as soil quality indicator. A brief section reporting some indices based on soil microarthropods is proposed at the end of this specific discussion. This paper can be considered as a reference point in the use of soil arthropods to estimate soil quality and health.

}, keywords = {bioindicators, macroarthropods, mesofauna, microarthropods, soil biodiversity, soil degradation, soil quality}, issn = {2075-4450}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11010054}, url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/11/1/54}, author = {Menta, Cristina and Remelli, Sara} } @article {1043, title = {Temporal complementarity in activity-density of two arthropod macro-detritivore taxa}, journal = {Insect Conservation and Diversity}, year = {2021}, month = {21/01/2021}, abstract = {

1. Macro-detritivores are important fragmenters performing a first step in the ecosystem process of nutrient cycling. Woodlice and millipedes are important representatives of this group and their ecology and niche requirements are often regarded as very similar. However, it is unclear whether there is a difference in temporal activity throughout the year between both groups, possibly leading to temporal complementarity for leaf litter breakdown, and whether patterns of temporal variation in activity are consistent across different habitat types.

2. We studied year-round pitfall-trap data of woodlice and millipedes from an old sand quarry with a high habitat heterogeneity.

3. Our results indicate that there is high temporal complementarity between both detritivore taxa, with millipede activity-density peaking in spring, while woodlice showing a peak in summer. Interestingly, timing of activity depended on habitat openness. Millipedes peak first in open habitat and later in closed habitat, while woodlice showed the opposite pattern.

4. Temporal turnover in community composition was high and of similar magnitude as spatial turnover in community composition across this relatively small scale of our study area.

5. We conclude that, although woodlice and millipedes show comparable habitat preferences, their temporal activity patterns show the potential for temporal complementarity for litter breakdown.

}, keywords = {Community composition, decomposers, Diplopoda, habitat openness, Isopoda, phenology}, issn = {1752-458X}, doi = {10.1111/icad.12471}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/icad.12471}, author = {De Smedt, Pallieter and Proesmans, Willem and Baeten, Lander} } @article {836, title = {Release of greenhouse gases from millipedes as related to food, body size, and other factors}, journal = {Soil Biology and Biochemistry}, volume = {144}, year = {2020}, month = {28/02/2020}, pages = {1-10}, abstract = {

The release of greenhouse gases from millipede digestive tracts warrants study because of its potential effect on climate change and also as an indicator of microbial processes that transform organic matter during passage through the gut of these animals. Gas chromatography was used to quantify the release of methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2), and nitrous oxide (N2O) from living millipedes in laboratory conditions. The effect of four food types (leaf litter of alder, oak, and maple, and rotten wood) on the release of CH4, CO2, and N2O by 12 species was also assessed. In addition, two julid species were fed pure cellulose to test the ability of these millipedes to obtain energy from cellulose and to determine the effect of this diet on gas production.

All of the tested millipede species produced CO2 and some produced CH4. Stable and substantial CH4 emission was restricted to the large millipedes in the tropical orders Spirobolida and Spirostreptida. This asymmetrical phylogenetic distribution of CH4 production may be related to body size and the presence of gut commensals, but these factors may influence each other and depend upon geographic distribution of species. The quality of the food and feeding regime can also affect CH4 production in that CH4 release was significantly higher when millipedes were fed alder leaf litter rather than oak or maple leaf litter. CO2 production from millipedes mainly reflected the metabolic response of the animals. Traces of N2O were only occasionally emitted by millipedes; this release evidently depends on the N content in the food and seems to be restricted to members of the Glomeridae family. Based on gas production, the tested species of millipedes were unable to obtain their energy needs from a diet of pure cellulose.

}, keywords = {Carbon dioxide, Cellulose, Diplopoda, Food, Methane, Nitrous oxide}, issn = {0038-0717}, doi = {10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107765}, url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0038071720300626}, author = {{\v S}ustr, Vladimir and {\v S}imek, Miloslav and Faktorov{\'a}, Lucie and Mackov{\'a}, Jana and Tajovsk{\'y}, Karel} } @article {519, title = {The millipede genus Julus Linnaeus, 1758 in the Caucasus (Diplopoda: Julida: Julidae)}, journal = {Zootaxa}, volume = {4461}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Aug 20}, pages = {89-117}, abstract = {

The genus Julus includes seven species already described from the Caucasus region: J. alexandrae Evsyukov, 2016; J. colchicus Lohmander, 1936; J. jedryczkowskii Golovatch, 1981; J. kubanus Verhoeff, 1921; J. lignaui Verhoeff, 1910; J. lindholmi Lohmander, 1936; and J. subalpinus Lohmander, 1936, as well as two new species: J. khostensis sp. n., from the Krasnodar Province, and, J. dagestanus sp. n., from the Republic of Dagestan, both in Russia. All nine species are described, illustrated and keyed, their morphological variations outlined, and distributions mapped, based on the literature data and abundant new samples. Altitudinal distribution patterns are also discussed.

}, keywords = {Caucasus, Diplopoda, fauna, Julus, millipede}, issn = {1175-5334}, doi = {10.11646/zootaxa.4461.1.7}, author = {Evsyukov, Aleksandr and Sergei Ilyich Golovatch and Reip, Hans S} } @article {399, title = {Present status of the millipede fauna of Hungary, with a review of three species of Brachyiulus Berl{\'e}se, 1884 (Diplopoda)}, journal = {Opuscula Zoologica}, volume = {51}, year = {2020}, month = {07/08/2020}, pages = {87-103}, abstract = {

Since 2005, the last comprehensive species list of the millipedes of Hungary, several new species to the fauna have been approved. Here we provide an updated summary of all Hungarian Diplopoda, comprising altogether 107 species. Brachyiulus pusillus (Leach, 1815) and Chondrodesmus riparius Carl, 1914, based on recent collections, are considered as new to the fauna of Hungary. We give special remarks to the following taxa: Julus curvicornis Verhoeff, 1899, Typhloiulus polypodus (Loksa, 1960), Hungarosoma bokori Verhoeff, 1928, Heteracrochordum evae (Loksa, 1960), Ochogona spp., Haasea hungarica (Verhoeff, 1928), Mastigona spp., and some Polydesmidae. In addition, the taxonomical relationship between B. bagnalli (Brolemann, 1924), B. lusitanus (Verhoeff, 1898), and B. pusillus is discussed in detail. With 21 figures.

}, keywords = {Brachyiulus pusillus, Chondrodesmus riparius, faunal list, new occurrences}, issn = {0237-5419}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.18348/opzool.2020.S2.87}, url = {http://opuscula.elte.hu/PDF/Tomus51_S2/Op_Korsos_Lazanyi_Hungary.pdf}, author = {Kors{\'o}s, Zolt{\'a}n and Laz{\'a}nyi, Eszter} } @article {343, title = {Two interesting records of millipedes (Diplopoda) from near Borjomi, Georgia}, journal = {Russian Entomological Journal}, volume = {29}, year = {2020}, month = {30/03/2020}, pages = {121{\textendash}122}, abstract = {

Polydesmus abchasius Attems, 1898 and Julus lindholmi Lohmander, 1936, both found recently near Borjomi, central Georgia, currently represent the southeasternmost records of the genera Polydesmus Latreille, 1803, subgenus Polydesmus s.str., and Julus Linnaeus, 1758, and of both these widespread, endemic, Caucasian millipede species.

РЕЗЮМЕ. Polydesmus abchasius Attems, 1898 и Julus lindholmi Lohmander, 1936, недавно найденные близ Боржоми (Центральная Грузия), пока представляют собой самые юго-восточные находки как родов Polydesmus Latreille, 1803, подрод Polydesmus s.str., и Julus Linnaeus, 1758, так и этих широкораспространенных эндемичных кавказских видов диплопод.

}, keywords = {Julida, Julus lindholmi, new records, Polydesmida, Polydesmus abchasius, новые находки}, issn = {0132-8069}, doi = {10.15298/rusentj.29.1.16}, url = {https://kmkjournals.com/journals/REJ/REJ_Index_Volumes/REJ_29/REJ_29_1_121_122}, author = {Kokhia, Mzia S. and Evsyukov, Aleksandr P. and Sergei Ilyich Golovatch} } @article {287, title = {Diversity and distribution of the millipedes (Diplopoda) of Georgia, Caucasus}, journal = {ZooKeys}, volume = {930}, year = {2020}, month = {28/04/2020}, pages = {199-219}, abstract = {

The diplopod fauna of Georgia, Transcaucasia, is very rich given the country\’s relatively small territory; it presently comprises 103 species from 44 genera, 12 families, and 7 orders. Most of the Diplopoda known from Georgia (86 species, or 83\%) demonstrate Caucasian distribution patterns, 36 and 46 species, as well as 8 and 9 genera being endemic or subendemic to the country, respectively. A single Holarctic family, Anthroleucosomatidae (order Chordeumatida), contains 44 Caucasian species and 20 genera, of which 27 species and 14 genera are endemic or subendemic to Georgia. Likewise, all species from the orders Polyzoniida, Siphonocryptida, Glomerida and Chordeumatida, as well as most species of Julida and Polydesmida are native, also endemic or subendemic to the Caucasus, but the genera and families they represent are widely distributed at least across the Euro-Mediterranean Realm. Most of the presumed troglobionts in the Caucasus appear to be confined to western Georgia\’s karst caves (14 species, 5 genera). Within Georgia, the fauna of the western part (= Colchis) is particularly rich and diverse, while that of the central and eastern parts of the country grows increasingly depauperate inland following the gradual climatic aridisation from west (Black Sea coast) to east (Armenia and Azerbaijan). The vertical distribution of the Diplopoda in Georgia, as well as the Caucasus generally, shows the bulk of the fauna restricted to forested lowland to mountain biomes or their remnants. Only very few Chordeumatida and Julus species seem to occur solely in the subalpine to alpine environments and thus may provisionally be considered as high-montane elements. Ongoing and future research on the millipedes of the Caucasus, especially in cave and montane environments, will undoubtedly allow for many more novelties and details of the diversity and distribution of Georgia\’s Diplopoda to be revealed or refined.

}, keywords = {checklist, Colchis, endemism, fauna, Myriapoda}, issn = {1313-2989}, doi = {10.3897/zookeys.930.47490}, url = {https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/47490/}, author = {Kokhia, Mzia S. and Sergei Ilyich Golovatch} } @article {146, title = {Notes on North American Julid{\ae}}, journal = {Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences}, volume = {4}, number = {1}, year = {1887}, month = {06/1887}, pages = {25{\textendash}44}, abstract = {

The following paper is based upon the material of this family embraced in the entomological collection in the Museum of the Indiana University. In connection with the description of the new species, it has also been deemed best to introduce descriptions of those already known to science. The types of the new genera and species are deposited in the above museum.

}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/35430622}, author = {Charles Harvey Bollman} }