@article {1232, title = {La diversidad de los ciempi{\'e}s (Chilopoda) de M{\'e}xico}, journal = {Dugesiana}, volume = {20}, year = {2013}, month = {30/08/2013}, pages = {17-41}, chapter = {17}, abstract = {

Resumen: Este trabajo presenta un registro hist\órico de la taxonom\ía de los ciempi\és (Chilopoda) descritos para M\éxico. En el pa\ís se han registrado 180 especies (una f\ósil) incluidas en 77 g\éneros, 17 familias y cuatro \órdenes. Veintis\éis g\éneros y 155 especies son end\émicos (una especie f\ósil). S\ólo una familia es end\émica: Eriphantidae (Geophilomorpha). A nivel de g\énero, son reconocibles cuatro elementos biogeogr\áficos en los ciempi\és de M\éxico: end\émico, Hol\ártico, Ne\ártico y Neotropical. Se anexa una lista de las especies de ciempi\és conocidas para el pa\ís, la cual incluye los estados en donde se han recolectado. La diversidad y distribuci\ón de los ciempi\és en M\éxico todav\ía es pobremente conocida y subestimada.

Mexican Diversity of Centipedes (Chilopoda)

Abstract: This paper provides a historical account about of taxonomy of Mexican fauna of centipedes (Chilopoda). A total of 180 identified species (one fossil) in 77 genera, 17 families and four orders have been recorded for Mexico. Twenty-six genera and 155 species are endemic (one fossil). Only one family is endemic: Eriphantidae (Geophilomorpha). At the generic level, four biogeographical elements are recognizable in Mexican centipedes: endemic, Holartic, Neartic, and Neotropical. This work includes a checklist with the centipedes species cited for Mexico and the states of this country where each species has been collected. The diversity and distribution of Mexican centipedes is still poorly known and underestimated.

}, keywords = {Geophilomorpha, Lithobiomorpha, Myriapoda, Scolopendromorpha, Scutigeromorpha, Taxonom{\'\i}a, Taxonomy}, issn = {1405-4094, 2007-9133}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.32870/dugesiana.v20i1.4076}, url = {http://dugesiana.cucba.udg.mx/index.php/DUG/article/view/4076}, author = {Cupul-Maga{\~n}a, Fabio Germ{\'a}n} } @article {768, title = {Tracheal systems in Chilopoda: a comparison under phylogenetic aspects}, journal = {Entomologica Scandinavica Supplement}, volume = {51}, year = {1997}, pages = {49{\textendash}60}, keywords = {Chilopoda, Craterostigmomorpha, Craterostigmus, Cryptopidae, Cryptops, Elektronenmikroskop, G.carpophagus, Geophilidae, Geophilomorpha, H.gabrielis, Himentarium, L.forficatus, Lichtmikroskop, Lithobiidae, Lithobiomorpha, Mikroskopie, morphologie, Myriapoda, Onychophora, Phylogenie, Scolopendra, Scolopendromorpha, Scutigera, Scutigeromorpha, Tracheensystem, vergleichend}, author = {Hilken, Gero} } @article {769, title = {Vergleich von Tracheensystemen unter phylogenetischem Aspekt}, journal = {Verhandlungen des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Hamburg (N.F.)}, volume = {37}, year = {1998}, pages = {5{\textendash}94}, keywords = {Chilopoda, Craterostigmomorpha, Craterostigmus, Cryptopidae, Cryptops hortensis, Elektronenmikroskop, G.carpophagus, Geophilidae, Geophilomorpha, H.gabrielis, Himentarium, L.forficatus, Lichtmikroskop, Lithobiidae, Lithobiomorpha, Mikroskopie, morphologie, Phylogenie, S.cingulata, Scolopendra, Scolopendromorpha, Scutigera, Scutigeromorpha, Tracheensystem, vergleichend}, author = {Hilken, Gero} }