@article {1811, title = {On some new genera of the class Myriapoda}, journal = {Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London}, volume = {10}, year = {1843}, month = {02/1843}, pages = {177-181}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Newport, G. (1843) [1842]: On some new genera of the class Myriapoda. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 10 (119): 177-181. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/244439

Bibliographic remarks: This work has an exact duplicate. Newport, George (1843): On some new Genera of the Class Myriapoda. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, including Zoology, Botany and Geology, ser. 1, 11 (73): 498-502. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/18642403 [01/06/1843]

Publication date remarks: The article was read on December 13, 1842. Part X bears the date 1842. Number CXIX was printed in February 1843.

}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/244439}, author = {Newport, George} } @article {1809, title = {On some new Genera of the Class Myriapoda [reprint]}, journal = {The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, including Zoology, Botany and Geology, ser. 1}, volume = {11}, year = {1843}, month = {01/06/1843}, pages = {498-502}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Newport, G. (1843): On some new Genera of the Class Myriapoda. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, including Zoology, Botany and Geology, ser. 1, 11 (73): 498-502. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/18642403

Bibliographic remark: Reprinted from the Proceedings of the Zoological Society for Dec. 13, 1842.

Publication date remarks: The printed date is July 1843. The publication date is 01/06/1843.

}, issn = {0374-5481}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/18642403}, author = {Newport, George} } @inbook {1798, title = {Tuhatjalkaiset - Myriapods - Myriapoda}, booktitle = {Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus {\textendash} Punainen kirja 2019}, year = {2019}, pages = {340-343}, publisher = {Ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}ministeri{\"o} \& Suomen ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}keskus}, organization = {Ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}ministeri{\"o} \& Suomen ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}keskus}, address = {Helsinki}, abstract = {

Viittausohje, kun viitataan yksitt\äiseen Punaisen listan lukuun: Vahtera, V. 2019. Tuhatjalkaiset. Julk.: Hyv\ärinen, E., Jusl\én, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddstr\öm, A. \& Liukko, U.-M. (toim.) 2019. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus \– Punainen kirja 2019. Ymp\ärist\öministeri\ö \& Suomen ymp\ärist\ökeskus. Helsinki. S. 340-343. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Reference of a separate chapter of the Red List: Vahtera, V. 2019. Myriapods. In: Hyv\ärinen, E., Jusl\én, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddstr\öm, A. \& Liukko, U.-M. (eds.) 2019. The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species. Ministry of the Environment \& Finnish Environment Institute. Helsinki. P. 340-343. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Summary: Myriapoda are a diverse group of terrestrial arthropods, some of which are herbivores, some predators and some decomposers. There are four classes of Myriapoda: centipedes (Chilopoda), millipedes (Diplopoda), pauropods (Pauropoda), and symphylans (Symphyla). In Finland, a total of 63 species have been found: 21 centipede, 28 millipede, eight pauropod, and six symphylan species. In total, there are ten red-listed species: the critically endangered (CR) Geophilus carpophagus, which was classified as Regionally Extinct (RE) in the two previous assessments, and the Near Threatened (NT) species G. electricus, G. truncorum and Julus scanicus. These species only have one known locality each, and no new observations have been made of the three Near Threatened (NT) species for a long time. Six species have been categorised as Data Deficient (DD). Many species were classified as Not Evaluated (NE) due to insufficient information on their occurrence. While no monitoring of Myriapoda has been organised in Finland, the information on the spread of the species in this country could be updated by organising a monitoring study of a few years in duration.

}, issn = {978-952-11-4973-3, ISBN 978-952-11-4974-0}, url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501}, author = {Vahtera, Varpu} } @book {1797, title = {Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus {\textendash} Punainen kirja 2019}, year = {2019}, pages = {704}, publisher = {Ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}ministeri{\"o} \& Suomen ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}keskus}, organization = {Ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}ministeri{\"o} \& Suomen ymp{\"a}rist{\"o}keskus}, address = {Helsinki}, abstract = {

Tiivistelm\ä: Julkaisussa esitell\ä\än Suomen lajien viides uhanalaisuusarviointi. Suomen lajim\ä\är\än arvioidaan nyky\ä\än olevan v\ähint\ä\än 48 000. Riitt\äv\ät tiedot uhanalaisuusarviointiin oli 22 418 lajista tai alemmasta taksonista, mik\ä on noin 47 \% lajistosta. Uhanalaisiksi arvioitiin 2 668 lajia tai alempaa taksonia eli noin 11,9 \% arvioiduista lajeista. Punaisen listan lajeja, joihin kuuluvat uhanalaisten lis\äksi h\ävinneet, silm\äll\äpidett\äv\ät ja puutteellisesti tunnetut on yhteens\ä 6 683 (29,8 \%). Arvioiduista lajeista \ä\ärimm\äisen uhanalaisia (CR) on 489, eritt\äin uhanalaisia (EN) 918, vaarantuneita (VU) 1 260, silm\äll\äpidett\ävi\ä (NT) 1 912, puutteellisesti tunnettuja (DD) 1 792, h\ävinneit\ä (RE) 312 ja elinvoimaisia (LC) 15 735. Arviointi tehtiin Kansainv\älisen luonnonsuojeluliiton (IUCN) ohjeiden ja kriteerien mukaan. IUCN:n alueellisen uhanalaisuusarvioinnin kriteerit perustuvat lajien havaittuun, arvioituun, p\ä\äteltyyn tai ennustettuun populaatioiden pienenemiseen, levinneisyys- tai esiintymisalueen kokoon, pieneen ja jatkuvasti taantuvaan tai hyvin pieneen populaatioon tai kvantitatiiviseen analyysiin. Lis\äksi Suomessa on dokumentoitu lajien elinymp\ärist\öt sek\ä uhanalaisuuden syyt ja uhkatekij\ät. Enemmist\ö uhanalaisista lajeista el\ä\ä metsiss\ä (31 \%) sek\ä perinneymp\ärist\öiss\ä ja muissa ihmisen muuttamissa ymp\ärist\öiss\ä (24 \%). Uhanalaisten osuus kunkin elinymp\ärist\ön arvioiduista lajeista on korkein tunturipaljakalla (37,9 \%). Uhanalaisten lajien m\ä\är\ä on suurin hemiboreaalisella ja etel\äboreaalisella vy\öhykkeell\ä Etel\ä-Suomessa. Julkaisussa vertaillaan arvioinnin tuloksia vuoden 2010 tuloksiin esimerkiksi uhanalaisuusindeksin avulla. Lis\äksi julkaisussa tarkastellaan vuoden 2010 uhanalaisuusarvioinnin ohjausryhm\än ehdotusten toteutumista. Arvioinnin tulosten pohjalta Eli\ölajien uhanalaisuuden arvioinnin ohjausryhm\ä (LAUHA) esitt\ä\ä 13 toimenpide-ehdotusta uhanalaisten lajien suojelun, hoidon, tutkimuksen ja seurannan j\ärjest\ämiseksi ja rahoittamiseksi. Arvioinnit on tehty eli\öryhm\äkohtaisissa ty\öryhmiss\ä ja ty\ön tulokset esitell\ä\än eli\öryhmitt\äin 39 luvussa.

Viittausohje, kun viitataan koko julkaisuun: Hyv\ärinen, E., Jusl\én, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddstr\öm, A. \& Liukko, U.-M. (toim.) 2019. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus \– Punainen kirja 2019. Ymp\ärist\öministeri\ö \& Suomen ymp\ärist\ökeskus. Helsinki. 704 s. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Sammandrag: I denna bok presenteras resultat av Finlands femte hotbed\ömning. Finlands artantal uppskattas f\ör tillf\ället till minst 48 000. Tillr\äckliga uppgifter f\ör hotbed\ömning fanns om 22 418 arter eller l\ägre taxa, vilket utg\ör 47 \% av alla arter. Av dessa bed\ömdes 2 667 arter eller l\ägre taxa vara hotade, d.v.s. 11,9 \%. R\ödlistade arter, som f\örutom hotade arter \även innefattar f\örsvunna arter, n\ära hotade arter och arter som det r\åder kunskapsbrist om, uppg\år till 6 683 (29,8 \%). Av de bed\ömda arterna \är 498 akut hotade (CR), 918 starkt hotade (EN), 1 260 s\årbara (VU), 1 912 n\ära hotade (NT), 1 792 med kunskapsbrist (DD), 312 f\örsvunna (RE) och 15 735 livskraftiga. Hoten har bed\ömts p\å basis av Internationella Naturv\årdsunionens (IUCN) regionala hotbed\ömningskriterier. Kriterierna grundar sig p\å observerad, deduktiv eller estimerad minskning av populationer eller utbrednings- och f\örekomstomr\åden, en liten och kontinuerligt minskande eller en mycket liten population eller p\å kvantitativ analys. D\ärut\över har arternas livsmilj\ö, hotorsak och hotfaktorer i Finland dokumenterats. Majoriteten av de hotade arterna lever i skogar (31 \%), v\årdbiotoper och andra kulturmilj\öer (24 \%). Antalet hotade arter \är h\ögst inom den hemiboreala och sydboreala zonen i s\ödra Finland. Andelen hotade arter i en specifik habitattyp \är h\ögst i kalfj\ället(37,9 \%). I publikationen j\ämf\örs resultaten av hotbed\ömningen med resultaten fr\ån \år 2010 t.ex. med hj\älp av r\ödlisteindexet. Vid sidan av bed\ömningsresultaten beskrivs de mest p\åtagliga administrativa och juridiska \åtg\ärder som vidtagits f\ör artskydd samt forskning och \övervakning sedan den f\öreg\ående bed\ömningen. Hotbed\ömningens styrgrupp (LAUHA ) f\öresl\år 13 \åtg\ärder f\ör organisering och finansiering av skydd, v\ård, forskning och \övervakning av hotade arter. Resultaten av bed\ömningen som \är genomf\örd av expertgrupper presenteras i 39 kapitel som omfattar olika organismgrupper.

The Red List of Finnish Species 2019

Abstract: This publication describes the fifth assessment of Finnish threatened species. The current estimated number of species in Finland is at least 48,000. Sufficient information was available for the evaluation of 22,418 species or lower taxa, which is approximately 47\% of all species. In total, 2,667 species or lower taxa (11.9\%) were assessed as threatened. The red-listed species, which, in addition to threatened species, include the species classified as Regionally Extinct, Near Threatened, and Data Deficient, total 6,683 (29.8\%). Of the species evaluated, 489 were classified as Critically Endangered (CR), 918 as Endangered (EN), 1,260 as Vulnerable (VU), 1,912 as Near Threatened (NT), 1,792 as Data Deficient (DD), 312 as Regionally Extinct (RE), and 15,735 as of Least Concern (LC). The assessment was carried out in accordance with guidelines and criteria issued by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and applied in assessments at the regional level. These criteria are based on observed, estimated, inferred, or projected population size reduction; the extent of occurrence or area of occupancy; continuing decline in a small population or a very small size of population; or a quantitative analysis. In addition, species\’ habitats, as well as causes of threat and threat factors, were documented in the Finnish evaluation. The majority of threatened species live in forests (31\%) and in rural biotopes and other cultural habitats (24\%). Of the species assessed the proportion of threatened species is highest in Alpine habitats (37.9\%). The number of threatened species is highest in the hemiboreal and southern boreal zones in southern Finland. The results of the assessment are compared to the previous assessment 2010 for example with the Red List Index. In addition, proceedings of the proposals given by the steering group of the previous assessment are evaluated. The steering group of this assessment made 13 proposals for measures for the arrangement and financing of the conservation, management, research, and monitoring of threatened species. The results of the work of the expert groups responsible for the evaluation are presented in 39 organism group -specific sections.

Reference of the publication: Hyv\ärinen, E., Jusl\én, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddstr\öm, A. \& Liukko, U.-M. (eds.) 2019. The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species. Ymp\ärist\öministeri\ö \& Suomen ymp\ärist\ökeskus. Helsinki. 704 p. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501

Publication date: 26/02/2019

}, keywords = {bed{\"o}mning, conservation of species, hotade arter, IUCN, lajiston suojelu, punainen lista, Red list, r{\"o}dlista, skydd av arter, threat assessment, threatened species, uhanalaiset lajit, uhanalaisuusarviointi}, issn = {978-952-11-4973-3, ISBN 978-952-11-4974-0}, url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299501}, author = {Hyv{\"a}rinen, Esko and Jusl{\'e}n, Aino and Kemppainen, Eija and Uddstr{\"o}m, Annika and Liukko, Ulla-Maija} } @article {1764, title = {Systematische Aufz{\"a}hlung der Crustaceen, Arachniden und Miriapoden, welche ich bisher in der Umgebung von Trier gefunden habe}, year = {1857}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Schnur, J. (1857): Systematische Aufz\ählung der Crustaceen, Arachniden und Miriapoden, welche ich bisher in der Umgebung von Trier gefunden habe. Jahresbericht der Gesellschaft f\ür n\ützliche Forschungen zu Trier, 5: 53-55. https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.43690.23

}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.43690.23}, url = {https://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/diglit/jahresbericht_trier1856/0057}, author = {Schnur, J.} } @article {1612, title = {Remarks on Scolopendra electrica, and Sc. subterranea}, journal = { Transactions of the Linnean Society of London}, volume = {2}, year = {1794}, month = {01/05/1794}, pages = {7-9}, issn = {1945-9432}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1794.tb00236.x}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/759836}, author = {Shaw, George} } @book {1547, title = {Systema naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis.}, volume = {1 (2)}, year = {1767}, pages = {533-1327}, publisher = {Impensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii}, organization = {Impensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii}, edition = {12}, address = {Stockholm}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.68927}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/137240}, author = {Linnaeus, Carolus} } @article {1509, title = {Millipedes and centipedes in German greenhouses (Myriapoda: Diplopoda, Chilopoda)}, journal = {Biodiversity Data Journal}, volume = {2}, year = {2014}, month = {11/04/2014}, pages = {1-43}, abstract = {

A review is given of all the literature records of millipedes and centipedes that have been found in German greenhouses together with additional records for 29 such sites. Species lists are given for 46 greenhouses investigated throughout Germany. Thirty-five diplopod and 18 chilopod species were found to occur in greenhouses, of which 15 (3 Chilopoda, 12 Diplopoda) are restricted to this type of habitat. First records for Germany include Anadenobolus monilicornis (Porat, 1876), Epinannolene cf. trinidadensis Chamberlin, 1918, Epinannolene sp., Mesoiulus gridellii Strasser, 1934, Leptogoniulus sorornus (Butler, 1876), Rhinotus purpureus (Pocock, 1894), Cryptops doriae Pocock, 1891, Lamyctes coeculus (Br\ölemann, 1889) and Tygarrup javanicus (Attems, 1907). The millipedes Oxidus gracilis (C. L. Koch, 1847) and Amphitomeus attemsi (Schubart, 1934) and the centipedes Lithobius forficatus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Cryptops hortensis (Donovan, 1810) are the species most frequently found in greenhouses.

}, keywords = {centipedes, first records, Germany, hothouse, millipedes, review}, issn = {1314-2828}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1066}, url = {https://bdj.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=1066}, author = {Decker, Peter and Reip, Hans S. and Voigtl{\"a}nder, Karin} } @article {1465, title = {Myriapoda Musei Cantabrigiensis. Part I. Chilopoda}, journal = {Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, held at Philadelphia, for promoting useful knowledge}, volume = {23}, year = {1886}, month = {27/03/1886}, pages = {161-233}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Meinert, F. (1886): Myriapoda Musei Cantabrigiensis. Part I. Chilopoda. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, held at Philadelphia, for promoting useful knowledge, 23 (122): 161-233. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.26797

Publication date remarks: The work by Meinert appeared in the Proceedings... volume 23, number 122. The number bears \"April 1886\" as the printed date, but the cover page of the copy at the Ernst Mayr Library, Harvard, bears the handwritten date \"Mar. 27, 1886\", which should be interpreted as a \"no later than\" date. The work by Meinert is the first in the number and encompasses signatures 2U-Z and 2A-D. Signatures 2U-V are dated as \"December 17, 1885\", signatures 2W-X as \"December 16, 1885\" (one day earlier), signatures 2Y-Z and 2A-B as \"December 31, 1885\", and signatures 2C-D as \"January 21, 1886\". At the moment, the chosen date in Myriatrix is 27/03/1886, following the cover page\&$\#$39;s handwritten date.

}, issn = {0003-049X}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.26797}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/26797}, author = {Meinert, Frederik} } @book {1462, title = {Systema naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis.}, volume = {1}, year = {1758}, pages = {824}, publisher = {Impensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii}, organization = {Impensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii}, edition = {10}, address = {Stockholm}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Linnaeus, C. (1758): Systema natur\æ per Regna Tria natur\æ, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, Cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. Editio decima, reformata. Tomus I. Impensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii, Holmi\æ. 824 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542

}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/10277}, author = {Linnaeus, Carolus} } @article {997, title = {A taxonomic key for nine first record species of Chilopoda-Arthropoda in Central Iraq}, journal = {Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera}, volume = {51}, year = {2020}, month = {15/05/2020}, pages = {608-614}, abstract = {

This study aimed to classified some species of Chilopoda which is the first record in Iraq. The samples collected from April 2018 to March 2019, in some areas of central of Iraq, which are: Baghdad, Anbar, Babylon, Diyala and Qadisiyah. We found nine species from 183 numbers of samples. The species we recorded for a first time in Iraq are: Scolopendra amazonica, S. afer, Cormocephalus nigrificatus, Cryptops anomalans, Geophilus flavus, Haplophilus souletinus, Lithobius microps, Lamyctes emarginatus and Scutigera coleoptrata. The species were supported by photos, then the samples where stored in Iraq Natural History Research center and Museum.

Remark: Keywords are wrong and were not added. The printed keywords belong to the subsequent article (by the same authors) in the issue.

}, keywords = {Choneiulus, Julidae, millipedes, Polydesmidae, Polydesmus}, issn = {0022-4324}, doi = {10.36872/LEPI/V51I2/301119}, url = {https://www.lepidopteraresearchfoundation.org/abstract.php?id=210}, author = {Al-Doori, Maysaloon Lafta and Azooz, Hayder Wahhab and Al-Door, Nibrass Lafta} } @article {946, title = {Distribution and indicator value of intertidal centipedes from Mediterranean beaches within and around Port-Cros National Park (Southern France), with proposal of a simplified monitoring (Chilopoda)}, journal = {Bulletin de la Soci{\'e}t{\'e} entomologique de France}, volume = {125}, year = {2020}, month = {20/03/2020}, pages = {41-62}, abstract = {

Abstract: A study on centipedes living on beaches within and around Port-Cros National Park was conducted during the spring of 2019, using hand-collection along transects. One hundred and twenty chilopods (108 of them being Geophilomorpha) were collected, including the halophilous species Henia bicarinata (Dignathodontidae), Geophilus fucorum and Tuoba poseidonis (Geophilidae). The halophilic character of H. bicarinata and G. fucorum was confirmed on the seashore of continental France while T. poseidonis was considered strictly halophilic. Pachymerium ferrugineum (Geophilidae) was considered only halotolerant, in the way it is not restricted to the coastline area. The dominant sediments were observed to have a moderate influence on the presence of halophilous and halobiontic geophilomorphs, with gravel sediments having a more favourable effect. In addition, microhabitats provided by pebbles are of significant importance for halophilic species while the presence of stranded Posidonia seems useful for these species. The availability of driftwood is favourable only when it gives a limited contact with the substrate or the stranded Posidonia layer. Lastly, the impact of human frequentation was very significant regarding halophilic species; all these species were found to be absent where human activity was high. The presence or absence of halophilic centipedes well shows the conservation state of the shore for species living in this habitat. An experimental easy monitoring with identification sheets is given to determine the conservation state of beaches in South-Eastern France.

R\épartition et valeur indicatrice des Chilopodes intertidaux des plages m\éditerran\éennes dans et autour du Parc national de Port-Cros (sud de la France), avec proposition d\’une m\éthode d\’\évaluation simplifi\ée (Chilopoda)

R\ésum\é: Une \étude sur les Chilopodes des plages dans et autour du Parc national de Port-Cros a \ét\é r\éalis\ée au printemps 2019, \à l\’aide de r\écoltes manuelles dans des transects. Cent-vingt chilopodes (108 de ceux-ci \étant des Geophilomorpha) ont \ét\é collect\és, incluant les esp\èces halophiles Henia bicarinata (Dignathodontidae), Geophilus fucorum et Tuoba poseidonis (Geophilidae). Le caract\ère halophile d\’H. bicarinata et de G. fucorum est confirm\é sur le littoral fran\çais, tandis que T. poseidonis est consid\ér\é comme strictement halophile (= halobie). Pachymerium ferrugineum (Geophilidae) est seulement consid\ér\é comme halotol\érant, dans le sens o\ù il n\’est pas restreint aux milieux sal\és littoraux en France. Les s\édiments dominants ont une influence mod\ér\ée sur la pr\ésence des halophiles et halobiontes, avec les s\édiments graveleux ayant un effet plus favorable. En compl\ément, les micro-habitats fournis par les galets sont d\’importance significative pour eux ; quant aux posidonies \échou\ées, elles semblent utiles. La disponibilit\é de bois \échou\és est consid\ér\ée comme favorable uniquement quand ils sont en contact \étroit avec le substrat ou la couche de posidonies \échou\ées. Enfin, l\’impact de la fr\équentation humaine est tr\ès significatif sur les esp\èces halophiles : toutes ces esp\èces sont absentes quand la fr\équentation humaine est \élev\ée. La pr\ésence ou absence des chilopodes halophiles est un bon indicateur de l\’\état de conservation des plages pour les esp\èces d\’Arthropodes inf\éod\ées \à cet habitat. Un suivi exp\érimental simplifi\é avec des fiches d\’identification est donn\é pour d\éterminer l\’\état de conservation des plages dans le sudest de la France.

}, keywords = {Geophilomorpha, halophilic species, Hy{\`e}res Var, Monitoring, wrack}, issn = {0037-928X}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.32475/bsef_2107}, url = {https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340067094_Distribution_and_indicator_value_of_intertidal_centipedes_from_Mediterranean_beaches_within_and_around_Port-Cros_National_Park_Southern_France_with_proposal_of_a_simplified_monitoring_Chilopoda}, author = {Iorio, {\'E}tienne and Geoffroy, David and P{\'e}tillon, Julien} } @article {944, title = {Myriapodes chilopodes et diplopodes des souterrains de Paris et de sa proche banlieue}, journal = {Spelunca, 5e s{\'e}rie}, year = {2020}, month = {03/2020}, pages = {39-47}, abstract = {

Une campagne d\’\échantillonnage des invert\ébr\és a \ét\é men\ée dans les r\éseaux souterrains de la ville de Paris et de la banlieue proche. Le pr\ésent travail pr\ésente les r\ésultats obtenus concernant les myriapodes (chilopodes et diplopodes) issus de ces r\écoltes. Six esp\èces de chilopodes (Classe Chilopoda) et neuf esp\èces de diplopodes (Classe Diplopoda) ont pu \être identifi\ées. Parmi ces derni\ères, certaines esp\èces sont nouvelles pour les d\épartements des Yvelines, des Hauts-de-Seine et de la Seine-Saint-Denis. Ces r\ésultats contribuent \à l\&$\#$39;enrichissement des inventaires et atlas des myriapodes de France (project INAMYFRA).

}, issn = {0242-1771}, url = {https://publications.ffspeleo.fr/bulletin.php?id=25999}, author = {Geoffroy, Jean-Jacques and Ferrand, Marina} } @booklet {866, title = {Newsletter of the British Myriapod and Isopod Group, 41, Autumn 2020}, year = {2020}, abstract = {

The newsletter includes items on: Centipede atlas update. The Darwin Tree of Life project. Luminous centipedes. Some rainforest goodies. Paul Richards giving an introduction to millipedes. Hebridean fossil millipedes in the Times.

Published: 15.11.2020 (website upload date, communicated by Steve Gregory).

}, url = {https://www.bmig.org.uk/sites/www.bmig.org.uk/files/news/BMIGnews41-2020.pdf}, author = {Helen J. Read} } @article {430, title = {Diagnoses de quelques Myriapodes nouveaux de l{\textquoteright}ordre des Chilopodes}, journal = {Revue et magasin de zoologie pure et appliqu{\'e}e, 2. S{\'e}r.}, volume = {10}, year = {1858}, pages = {545-547}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/2316896}, author = {de Saussure, Henri Louis Frederic} } @article {316, title = {Some records of chilopods from Florida}, journal = {Entomological news}, volume = {69}, year = {1958}, month = {18/01/1958}, pages = {13-14}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.10387}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/2739482}, author = {Chamberlin, Ralph V} } @article {264, title = {{\'E}tudes pour servir {\`a} l{\textquoteright}histoire naturelle des Myriapodes}, journal = {Annales des sciences naturelles, s{\'e}rie 2, Zoologie}, volume = {7}, year = {1837}, month = {01/1837}, pages = {35-60}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Gervais, P. (1837): \Études pour servir \à l\’histoire naturelle des Myriapodes. Annales des sciences naturelles, s\érie 2, Zoologie, 7: 35-60. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/28836

}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/28836}, author = {Gervais, P.} } @article {241, title = {Japanesische Arachniden und Myriapoden}, journal = {Verhandlungen der kaiserlich-k{\"o}niglichen zoologisch-botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien}, volume = {27}, year = {1878}, pages = {735-798}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/42882269}, author = {Ludwig Carl Christian Koch} } @article {195, title = {A common terminology for the external anatomy of centipedes (Chilopoda)}, journal = {ZooKeys}, volume = {69}, year = {2010}, month = {18/11/2010}, pages = {17-51}, abstract = {

A common terminology for the external morphological characters of centipedes (Chilopoda) is proposed. Terms are selected from the alternatives used in the English literature, preferring those most frequently used or those that have been introduced explicitly. A total of 330 terms are defined and illustrated, and another ca. 500 alternatives are listed.

}, keywords = {Chilopoda, morphology, terminology}, issn = {1313-2989}, doi = {10.3897/zookeys.69.737}, url = {http://zookeys.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=2466}, author = {Bonato, Lucio and Edgecombe, Gregory D. and Lewis, John G. E. and Minelli, Alessandro and Pereira, Luis A. and Shelley, Rowland M. and Marzio Zapparoli} } @mastersthesis {175, title = {Kter{\'y} zp{\r u}sob managementu polomu vyhovuje stono{\v z}k{\'a}m? - Which windthrow management is suitable for centipedes?}, volume = {bachelor}, year = {2020}, month = {28/01/2020}, pages = {35}, school = {UP v Olomouci - Palacky University of Olomouc}, type = {bakal{\'a}{\v r}sk{\'a} pr{\'a}ce - bachelor{\textquoteright}s thesis}, address = {Olomouc}, abstract = {

V{\v e}trn\é disturbance hraj\í v\ýznamnou roli ve v\ývojov\ém cyklu horsk\ého smrkov\ého lesa. Plo\šn\é odstran{\v e}n\í zapojen\ého korunov\ého patra otev\ír\á prostor pro nov\á spole{\v c}enstva a spole{\v c}n{\v e} s l\ýko{\v z}routem smrkov\ým je podle posledn\ích studi\í kl\í{\v c}ov\ým prvkem obnovy horsk\é smr{\v c}iny. V{\v e}trn\é disturbance v\šak ovliv{\v n}uj\í i hospod\á{\v r}sk\é smrkov\é lesy, kde je v{\v e}t\šinou tendence padl\é d{\v r}evo zpracovat pro ekonomick\ý zisk a jako prevenci v{\r u}{\v c}i po{\v z}\ár{\r u}m a k{\r u}rovcov\é kalamit{\v e}. Takov\ý z\ásah vich{\v r}ice m\á p{\v r}irozen\ý dopad i na p{\r u}dn\í faunu. Tato pr\áce se zab\ýv\á dopadem vich{\v r}ice na spole{\v c}enstva stono{\v z}ek ve Vysok\ých a Z\ápadn\ích Tatr\ách a sna{\v z}\í se zodpov{\v e}d{\v e}t ot\ázku, jak\ý n\ásledn\ý management polomu ve smrkov\ém lese stono{\v z}k\ám v\íce vyhovuje. Pro odb{\v e}ry byly stanoveny referen{\v c}n\í plochy a plochy s odli\šn\ým managementem polomu, kter\é byli prim\árn{\v e} sledov\ány mezi roky 2007 a{\v z} 2009. Pro odb{\v e}r materi\álu byly pou{\v z}ity p{\r u}dn\í vzorky, pro sledov\án\í epigeick\é aktivity stono{\v z}ek byly na lokalit\ách um\íst{\v e}ny padac\í zemn\í pasti. Celkov{\v e} bylo determinov\áno 2535 jedinc{\r u}, zaznamen\áno bylo 14 druh{\r u}. Ze z\ískan\ých dat lze usoudit, {\v z}e bezz\ásahov\ý management m{\v e}l 5 let po vich{\v r}ici pozitivn{\v e}j\š\í vliv na abundance stono{\v z}ek oproti asana{\v c}n\ímu managementu na sledovan\ých ploch\ách.

Vaverka M. (2020): Which windthrow management is suitable for centipedes? [bachelor\’s thesis]. Olomouc: Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Palacky University of Olomouc. 35 pp. 2 Appendices. In Czech.

English Abstract:
Wind disturbances play an important role in the development cycle of mountain spruce forest.
Complete removal of the tree canopy open space for new communities and together with spruce bark beetle, according to the current studies, are a key element in development cycle of mountain spruce forest. However, windstorms also affect economic spruce forests, where is usually a tendency to remove fallen timber for economic gain and for the prevention of fire and bark beetle calamity. Naturally, windthrow has an important impact on the soil fauna. This work deals with impact of windstorm on centipede communities in High and West Tatra Mts. with an interest to explain, which windthrow management in spruce forest is more suitable for centipedes. Reference areas and areas with different management were established for the sampling primarily in the years 2007 to 2009. Heat extraction of soil samples was used for evaluation of abundances and pitfall traps for evaluation of epigeic activity of centipedes. Totally, 2535 individuals of 14 species were identified. The collected data can be partially concluded that non-intervention management had positive influence on the abundance of centipedes 5 years after the windstorm, compared with timber-removed stands.

}, keywords = {Chilopoda, disturbance, Norway spruce, polom, smrk, Tatras, Tatry, vich{\v r}ice, windstorm, windthrow}, url = {http://myriapoda.upol.cz/tuf/pdf/papers/Vaverka2020.pdf}, author = {Vaverka, Miroslav} } @article {167, title = {New North American myriapods}, journal = {Entomologica Americana}, volume = {3}, year = {1887}, month = {08/1887}, pages = {81{\textendash}83}, publisher = {[Lawrence, Kan., etc.]New York Entomological Society [etc.]}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/11405971}, author = {Charles Harvey Bollman} } @article {61, title = {A tabular View of the external Characters of Four Classes of Animals, which Linn{\'e} arranged under Insecta; with the Distribution of the Genera composing Three of these Classes into Orders, \&c. and Descriptions of several New Genera and Species}, journal = {Transactions of the Linnean Society of London}, volume = {11}, year = {1816}, month = {24/01/1816}, pages = {306-400}, abstract = {

Recommended citation: Leach, W. E. (1816) [1815]: A tabular View of the external Characters of Four Classes of Animals, which Linn\é arranged under Insecta; with the Distribution of the Genera composing Three of these Classes\  into Orders, \&c. and Descriptions of several New Genera and Species. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 11 (2): 306-400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1813.tb00065.x

}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1813.tb00065.x}, url = {https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/19716}, author = {Leach, William Elford} }